Skip to main content

Measuring Transformation of Education Policy—a Mixed-Method Approach

  • Chapter
Transformation of Education Policy

Abstract

In his famous essay, “The Methodology of the Social Sciences” Max Weber indicated that new social and cultural phenomena bring along new academic problems. These new academic problems, however, call for an adjustment of the paradigmatic and methodological apparatus. In this chapter, we point to the methodological challenges arising from new and complex social phenomena in the realm of internationalizing education policy and how they can be addressed by a systematic combination and pooling of different methods with their particular strengths and limitations. Basically, new analytical problems can be dealt with in three different ways. The first and least desirable way is to downsize the phenomenon in question to make it accessible within a given methodological framework. The second is to refine a given methodological framework to make it cover more aspects of the phenomenon in question, thus to increase the validity of the respective type of data. The third is to deepen the overall validity of analysis by a systematic rearrangement of the methodological framework. Such an arrangement should combine both qualitative and quantitative methodological strategies with descriptive and explanative logics of research. A carefully arranged mixed-method approach can not only account more deeply for more facets of the phenomenon in question, but can also connect the methods involved in an appropriate way in order to counterbalance their limits and to pool their strengths.

But there comes a moment when the atmosphere changes. The significance of the unreflectively utilized viewpoints becomes uncertain and the road is lost in the twilight. The light of the great cultural problems moves on. Then science too prepares to change its standpoint and its thinking apparatus and to view the streams of events from the heights of thought.

Weber 1949 [1904]: 55

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barton, Allen H. and Paul F. Lazarsfeld (1955) “Some Functions of Qualitative Analysis in Social Research,” Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, 1, 321–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, Alexander and Wolfgang Menz (2002) “Das theoriegenerierende Experteninterview. Erkenntnisinteresse, Wissensformen, Interaktion,” in A. Bogner, B. Littig, and W. Menz, eds., Das Experteninterview. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendungen, Opladen: Leske+Budrich, 33–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, Henry E. and David Collier, eds. (2004) Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Lanham and others: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, Henry E., David Collier, and Jason Seawright (2004) “Refocusing the Discussion of Methodology,” in H.E. Brady and D. Collier, eds., Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Lanham and others: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, Marius (2007) “Determinants of Public Education Spending in 21 OECD democracies, 1980–2001,” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (4), 582–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caracelli, Valerie J. and Jennifer C. Greene (1993) “Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15 (2), 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, Lewis Anthony (1970) Elite and Specialized Interviewing, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froschauer, Ulrike and Manfred Lueger (2003) Das qualitative Interview. Zur Praxis interpretativer Analyse sozialer Systeme, Vienna: WUV.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennett (2005) Case Study Research and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jennifer C. and Charles McClintock (1985) “Triangulation in Evaluation: Design and Analysis Issues,” Evaluation Review 9 (5), 523–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jennifer C., Valerie J. Caracelli, and Wendy F. Graham (1989) “Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11 (3), 255–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, Withold J. (2002) “The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment,” Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (2), 355–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, Dorothea (2003) Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse, Opladen: Leske+Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter J. (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, Udo and Christian Erzberger (2000) “Qualitative und Quantitative Methoden: kein Gegensatz,” in U. Flick, E. v. Kardorff, and I. Steinke, eds., Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch, Hamburg: Rowohlt, 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba (1994) “Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference,” Qualitative Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, David, Franz Urban Pappi, Jeffrey Broadbent, and Yutaka Tsujinaka (1996) Comparing Policy Networks. Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, Kerstin and Michael Brüggemann (2006) Kein Experte ist wie der andere— Vom Umgang mit Missionaren und Geschichtenerzählern, TranState Working Paper No. 39, Bremen: CRC 597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Horst (2004) Interview und schriftliche Befragung—Entwicklung, Durchführung und Auswertung, Munich: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, David L., Margaret B. Neal, and Paula Carder (1997) “The Stability of Core and Peripheral Networks Over Time,” Social Networks 19 (1), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth (2006) Der Bologna-Prozess als Politiknetzwerk. Akteure, Beziehungen, Perspektiven, Wiesbaden: DUV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth (2008) Analysing Change in International Politics. A Semiotic Method of Structural Connotation, TranState Working Paper No. 70, Bremen: CRC 597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth, Tonia Bieber, Anja P. Jakobi, Philipp Knodel, Dennis Niemann, and Janna Teltemann (2009) Measuring Transformation: A Mixed-Method Approach to the Internationalization of Education Politics, TranState Working Paper No. 83, Bremen: CRC 597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Melvyn, and David Marsh (2002) “Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Methods,” in D. Marsh and G. Stoker, eds., Theory and Methods in Political Science, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 231–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinson, Richard, and Irene Browne (1994) “Education and the Economy,” in N.J. Smelser and R. Swedberg, eds., Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 581–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnell, Rainer, Paul Hill, and Elke Esser (1999) Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, Munich: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, John (2003) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibel, Wolfgang and Joerg Raab (2003) “Verfolgungsnetzwerke. Zur Messung von Arbeitsteilung und Machtdifferenzen in den Verfolgungsapparaten des Holocaust,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 55 (3), 197–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suitor, Jill, Barry Wellman, and David L. Morgan (1997) “It’s About Time: How, Why, and When Networks Change,” Social Networks 19 (1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George (1995) “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism,” British Journal of Political Science 25 (3), 289–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Stanley and Katherine Faust (1995) Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max ( 1949 [1904]) The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Alexander-Kenneth Nagel, Tonia Bieber, Anja P. Jakobi, Philipp Knodel, Dennis Niemann, and Janna Teltemann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nagel, AK., Bieber, T., Jakobi, A.P., Knodel, P., Niemann, D., Teltemann, J. (2010). Measuring Transformation of Education Policy—a Mixed-Method Approach. In: Martens, K., Nagel, AK., Windzio, M., Weymann, A. (eds) Transformation of Education Policy. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281295_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics