Abstract
The German presidency of the EU and the G8 summits since 2007 have selected energy security and the challenges of climate change as one of the most important policy issues on their agenda. In the EU, climate change is considered not just as a global environmental and ecological challenge, but is increasingly also perceived as one of the twenty-first century’s most important security threats that ‘directly threatens European interests’. The following analysis will focus on the EU’s and Germany’s achievements, but also the uncertainties and challenges of its energy-climate policy nexus and the implementation problems of the ambitious targets of its energy and climate policies. Furthermore, it will also examine the implications for global stability and human security as based on the approach ‘Freedom from Fear’. This is understood as the freedom for individuals and communities from basic insecurity and from the consequences of conflicts, where individuals and communities are deliberately targeted with impunity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See International Energy Agency (IEA) (2007) World Energy Outlook 2007: China and India Insights (Paris: IEA), pp. 192ff.
See IEA (2007) Energy Security and Climate Policy. Assessing Interactions (Paris: IEA).
See D. Yergin (2006) ‘Ensuring Energy Security’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 2, March-April 2006, 69–82, here 74.
See J. Mouawad, ‘Promise of Biofuel Clouded by Weather Risks’, New York Times, 1 July 2008 (Internet-version).
See Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (Cambridge: Fourth Assessment).
See N. Stern (October 2006) The Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change (London: HM Treasury).
See IEA (2007) Energy Security and Climate Policy (Paris: IEA), pp. 18, 102ff, http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2007/energy_security_climate_policy.pdf (accessed 14 January 2009).
See J. Podesta, P. Ogden, Global Warning. The Security Challenges of Climate Change, Center for American Progress, Washington DC, November 2007;
K. M. Campbell, A. T. J. Lennon and J. Smith, The Age of Consequences. The Foreign Policy and National Security Implications of Global Climate Change (Washington DC: CSIS and Center for a New American Security, November 2007).
See Center for Naval Analysis (CAN) (2007) National Security and the Threat of Climate Change (Alexandria/Virginia: CNA-Corporation).
See also F. Umbach (2008) ‘German Debates on Energy Security and Impacts on Germany’s 2007 EU Presidency’ in A. Marquina (ed.) Energy Security. Visions from Asia and Europe (Hampshire-New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 1–23.
See F. Umbach (2007) ‘The Legs of the Triangle–the EU-China Relations’ in W. Jung (ed.) The New Strategic Triangle: China, Europe and the United States in a Changing International System, KAS-Schriftenreihe, No. 76 (Beijing: Konrad-Adenauer-Foundation), pp. 36–45.
See also N. Mabey (2008) Delivering Climate Security. International Security Responses to a Climate Changed World, RUSI-Whitehall Papers 69 (Abington: Routledge);
N. Mabey (2007) ‘Climate Change: Security Implications and Regional Impacts’ in IISS, Strategic Survey 2007 (Oxon-London-New York: Routledge), pp. 46–68;
J. Podesta, P. Ogden (Winter 2007/2008) ‘The Security Implications of Climate Change’, Washington Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, 115–138;
J. Smith, D. Mix (Winter 2007/2008) ‘The Transatlantic Climate Change Challenge’, Washington Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, 139–154.
D. Seddon (May 2007) ‘Insecure Environment. International Implications of Climate Change’, fane’s Intelligence Review, pp. 7–13.
See F. Umbach (November 2007) Zielkonflikte der europäischen Energiesicherheit. Dilemmata zwischen Russland und Zentralasien (Berlin: DGAPanalyse, No. 3).
See European Commission (2005) Report on the Green Paper on Energy. Four Years of European Initiatives (Brussels-Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union).
See F. Umbach (2008) ‘China’s Energy Insecurity in Context of Growing Geopolitical Competition: Implications for the Future EU-China Relations’ in Klaus Lange (ed.), European-Chinese Security Cooperation: Possibilities and Limits, Konferenzband, Studies & Comments 6 (Munich: Akademie für Akademie für Politik und Zeitgeschehen der Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung/HSS), pp. 43–59
F. Umbach (2008) ‘Die Welt kommt an der Kohle nicht vorbei’ in Jürgen Petermann (ed.) Sichere Energie im 21. Jahrhundert (Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe), pp. 151–155.
See J. Auer (6 February 2007) ‘Technology to Clean Up Coal for the Post-Oil Era’, Current Issues, Energy Special (Frankfurt/M.: Deutsche Bank Research).
See F. Umbach (2007) Licht und Schatten auf dem EU-Frühjahrsgipfel 2007 — Gemeinsame Energie- und Energieaußenpolitik oder nationale Sonderbeziehungen mit Russland (Berlin: DGAP-Standpunkt, No. 3).
See J. Auer, ‘Germany — the Global Force in Wind Energy’, Current Issues, Energy and Climate Change, 5 December 2007 (Frankfurt/M.: Deutsche Bank Research).
See C. Ehrenstein, ‘Kritik am angeblich größten Klimaschutz-Paket der Welt’, Die Welt, 19 June 2008, p. 2.
See D. Wetzel, ‘Milliardenkosten für Verbraucher’, Die Welt, 6 June 2008.
See R. Haimann, ‘Klimaschutz überfordert Hausbesitzer’, Die Welt, 9 July 2008, p. 20.
See D. Wetzel, ‘Windenergie soll die Biosprit-Lücke füllen’, Die Welt, 18 July 2008, p. 12.
See A. Riley and F. Umbach, ‘Out of Gas. Looming Russian Gas Deficits Demand Readjustment of European Energy Policy’, Internationale Politik (Global Edition), Spring Issue, no. 1, 83–90
F. Umbach (November 2007) Zielkonflikte der europischen Energiesicherheit. Dilemmata zwischen Russland und Zentralasien. (Berlin: DGAPanalyse, no. 3), p. 19.
See S. Kohler, Interview, ‘Strom wird knapper’, Wirtschaftswoche, no. 32, 4 August 2008, 28f.
See C. Kemfert, T. Traber and T. P. Truong, ‘Comprehensive Package of Climate Protection Measures Could Substantially Decrease Costs of Emission Reductions in Germany’, DIW-Weekly Report, Berlin, Vol. 3, 1 June 2007.
See Wilhelm Sager (2008) ‘Sicherheitspolitische Herausforderungen in Zeiten des Klimawandels’, Der Mittler-Brief. Informationsdienst zur Sicherheitspolitik, No. 3;
Harald Welzer (2008) Klimakriege. Wofür im 21. Jahrhundert getötet wird (Frankfurt/M: S. Fischer Verlag);
Hermann E. Ott (July 2007) Internationale Klimapolitik 2020. Herausforderung für die deutsche (Umwelt-)Außenpolitik. Kompass 2020: Deutschland in den internationalen Beziehungen: Ziele, Instrumente, Perspektiven (Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung).
See, for instance, Bjorn Lomborg (2008) Cool It. Warum wir trotz Klimawandels einen kühlen Kopf behalten sollten (Munich: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt).
See Annabelle Houdret (2009) ‘Umwelt- und Klimawandel’ in M. A. Ferdowsi (ed.) Internationale Politik als Überlebensstrategie (Munich: Bayerische Landeszentrale für politische Bildungsarbeit), pp. 89–108, here pp. 93–96 and 103f.;
W. Sachs, H. Ott (February 2007) ’Öljunkies auf Entzug! Umweltpolitik st Ressourcenpolitik ist Sicherheitspolitik’, Internationale Politik, pp. 6–15
Ulrich Schlie, Benedikta von Seher-Thoß (2008) ‘Bundesverteidigungsministerium: Klimawandel und Sicherheit’ in J. Brametal. (eds), Weltverträgliche Energiesicherheitspolitik (Munich: Oldenbourg-Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH), pp. 54–59.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Frank Umbach
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Umbach, F. (2010). The EU and Germany’s Policies on Climate Change. In: Marquina, A. (eds) Global Warming and Climate Change. Energy, Climate and the Environment Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281257_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281257_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31510-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28125-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)