Skip to main content

market power and collusion in laboratory markets

  • Chapter
Behavioural and Experimental Economics

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave Economics Collection ((NPHE))

Abstract

The robustness of competitive market predictions stands as one of the most impressive results in experimental economics. Laboratory markets regularly generate competitive outcomes in environments populated by just two or three sellers. However, as in natural contexts, competitive outcomes do not always emerge. This article reviews results of laboratory markets in which price increases are driven by factors such as the exercise of unilateral market power or by collusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alger, D. 1987. Laboratory tests of equilibrium predictions with disequilibrium price data. Review of Economic Studies 54, 105–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cason, T.N. and Williams, A.W. 1990. Competitive equilibrium convergence in posted-offer markets with extreme earnings inequities. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 14, 331–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coursey, D., Isaac, R.M., Luke, M. and Smith, V.L. 1984. Market contestability in the presence of sunk (entry) costs. RAND Journal of Economics 15, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.D. and Holt, C.A. 1993. Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.D. and Holt, C.A. 1994. Market power and mergers in laboratory markets with posted prices. RAND Journal of Economics 25, 467–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.D. and Holt, C.A. 1998. Conspiracies and secret discounts in laboratory markets. Economic Journal 108, 736–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.D. and Wilson, B. 2002. An experimental investigation of methods for detecting collusion. Economic Inquiry 40, 213–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufwenberg, M. and Gneezy, U. 2000. Price competition and market concentration: an experimental study. International Journal of Industrial Organization 18, 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, Y., McCabe, K., Olson, M.A., Rassenti, S. and Smith, V. 2004. Oligopoly competition in fixed cost environments. International Journal of Industrial Organization 22, 147–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouraker, L.E. and Siegel, S. 1963. Bargaining Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godby, R. 2000. Market power and emission trading: theory and laboratory results. Pacific Economic Review 5, 349–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grether, D.M. and Plott, C.R. 1984. The effects of market practices in oligopolistic markets: an experimental examination of the ethyl case. Economic Inquiry 24, 479–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C.A. 1995. Industrial organization: a survey of laboratory research. In The Handbook of Industrial Organization, ed. J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C.A. and Davis, D.D. 1990. The effects of non-binding price announcements on posted-offer markets. Economics Letters 34, 307–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck, S., Normann, H. and Oechssler, J. 2000. Does information about competitors’ actions increase or decrease competition in experimental oligopoly markets? International Journal of Industrial Organization 18, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck, S., Konrad, K.A., Műller, W. and Normann, H.T. 2007. The merger paradox and why aspiration levels let it fail in the laboratory. Economic Journal 117, 1073–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, R.M., Ramey V. and Williams, A. 1984. The effects of market organization on conspiracies in restraint of trade. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5, 191–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, J.B. 1993. Nash equilibrium and buyer rationing rules: experimental evidence. Economic Inquiry 31, 631–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O.R. and Mason, C.F. 1991. Mutual forbearance in experimental congolomerate markets. RAND Journal of Economics 23, 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassenti, S.J., Smith, V.L. and Wilson, B.J. 2003. Controlling market power and price spikes in electricity networks: demand-side bidding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 2998–3003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffle, B.J. 2000. Some factors affecting demand withholding in posted-offer markets. Economic Theory 16, 529–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B.J. 1998. What collusion? Unilateral market power as a catalyst for countercyclical markups. Experimental Economics 1, 133–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, D.D. (2010). market power and collusion in laboratory markets. In: Durlauf, S.N., Blume, L.E. (eds) Behavioural and Experimental Economics. The New Palgrave Economics Collection. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280786_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics