Abstract
Killer protagonists proliferate in the post-World War Two noir thriller: revenge-seekers, criminally inclined social climbers and scornfully superior psychopaths, these ‘fatal men’ derive from earlier noir character types, all of them being in some measure victims seeking to become active agents and taking on the qualities of the punitive investigator, the gangster or the murderer. In these later narratives, however, the focus is less on the determining force of adverse economic circumstances than on society’s demands for conformity. The pressure towards conformity shapes the behaviour of some protagonists, particularly that of the upwardly mobile murderer, and is challenged by others — the revenge figure and the psychopath. In Horace McCoy’s 1948 novel, Kiss Tomorrow Goodbye, the psychopathic gangster protagonist makes explicit the difference between the way pre- and post-World War Two narratives allocate guilt. He argues that his college education and Phi Beta Kappa key demonstrate that he should not be used, in literature or the movies, ‘as a preachment’ on the theme of socio-economic determinism:
… it proves that I came into crime through choice and not through environment. I didn’t grow up in the slums with a drunk for a father and a whore for a mother and come into crime that way. I hate society too, but I don’t hate it because it mistreated me and warped my soul. Every other criminal I know — who’s engaged in violent crime — is a two-bit coward who blames his career on society (235).
Ralph Cotter’s speech is the ranting of a megalomaniac, but it also exem-plifies a significant shift in the kind of explanatory framework to be found in the noir thrillers of this period.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Jonathan Munby, Public Enemies, Public Heroes: Screening the Gangster from Little Caesar to Touch of Evil (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), p. 116, gives examples of some who argue in this way,
such as James J. Parker, ‘The Organizational Environment of the Motion Picture Sector’, in Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach and Muriel G. Cantor (eds), Media, Audience, and Social Structure (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1986).
Mark Seltzer, Serial Killers: Death and Life in America’s Wound Culture (New York: Routledge, 1998), p. 162.
Jack Shadoian, Dreams and Dead Ends: the American Gangster/Crime Film (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1977), pp. 209–13;
Chris Hugo, ‘The Big Combo: Production Conditions and the Film Text’, in Ian Cameron (ed.), The Movie Book of Film Noir (London: Studio Vista, 1992), p. 249; Munby, Public Enemies, pp. 126–33;
Alain Silver and Elizabeth Ward (eds), Film Noir (London: Secker and Warburg, 1979, 1992), pp. 28–9, 105–6, 142–3 and 226–7.
And see Frank McConnell, ‘Pickup on South Street and the Metamor-phosis of the Thriller’, Film Heritage, 8 (1973), p. 15.
Bill Pronzini and Jack Adrian (eds), Hard-Boiled: an Anthology of American Crime Stories (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 348.
Westlake talking to Charles L. P. Silet, ‘Interview with Donald Westlake’, in Lee Server, Ed Gorman and Martin H. Greenberg (eds), The Big Book of Noir (New York: Carroll and Graf Publishers, 1998), p. 269.
See the chapter on PointBlank in James F. Maxfield, The Fatal Woman: Sources of Male Anxiety in Film Noir, 1941–1991 (Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1996), pp. 95–107; and Silver and Ward, pp. 229–30.
Max Allan Collins and James L. Traylor, One Lonely Knight: Mickey Spillane’s Mike Hammer (Bowling Green, Ohio: Popular Press, 1984), pp. 4–6. ‘Mike Danger’ was revived for Tekno Comics in the mid-1990s.
See James Naremore, More Than Night: Film Noir in its Contexts (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), p. 256, and Mickey Spillane, the Guardian interview, National Film Theatre, 29 July 1999.
Maxim Jakubowski, ‘The Tough Guy Vanishes’, in The Daily Telegraph, 2 May 1998; Geoffrey O’Brien, Hardboiled America: Lurid Paperbacks and the Masters of Noir, expanded edn (New York: Da Capo Press, 1997), p. 104, quotes the 1953 New American Library boast that ‘over 15 000000 copies of his books have been published in Signet editions’. Server, writing in the mid-1990s, estimates that there have been ‘150 million or so’ copies of Spillane’s books sold to date. Spillane took up the series again in 1962, with The Girl Hunters.
Frank Krutnik, In a Lonely Street: Film, Genre, Masculinity (London: Routledge, 1991), p. 207.
Criticisms like that of Anthony Boucher, for example, who suggests that I, the Jury resembles ‘required reading in a Gestapo training school’. See Jakubowski, ‘The Tough Guy Vanishes’; and John M. Reilly (ed.), Twentieth-Century Crime and Mystery Writers (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1980, 1985), p. 814.
Ibid. On the connections between Hammer and Sapper’s Bulldog Drum-mond, see Julian Symons, Bloody Murder, From the Detective Story to the Crime Novel: a History (London: Pan, 1972, 1992), p. 186.
William Ruehlmann, Saint with a Gun: the Unlawful American Private Eye (Washington, DC: American University Press, 1974), p. 98: Hammer’s crusade ‘is easy for an American to identify with; his vendettas are his readers’.
‘Patricia Highsmith im Gespräch mit Holly-Jane Rahlens’, in Franz Cavagelli and Fritz Senn (eds), Über Patricia Highsmith, quoted by Tony Hilfer, The Crime Novel: a Deviant Genre (Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, 1990), p. 129.
Jon L. Breen, ‘The Novels of Vin Packer’, in Jon L. Breen and Martin Harry Greenberg (eds), Murder Off the Rack: Critical Studies of Ten Paperback Masters (Metuchen, New Jersey: The Scarecrow Press, 1989), p. 55.
Lee Server, Over My Dead Body: the Sensational Age of the American Paperback: 1945–1955 (San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 1994), pp. 52–5; and Ed Gorman, ‘The Golden Harvest: Twenty-Five-Cent Paperbacks’, in Server et al. (eds), Big Book of Noir, p. 186.
As Zizek points out, in the Hitchcock films focusing on ‘transference of guilt’ the main character accused by mistake is never straightforwardly innocent: though not guilty of the facts he is guilty of desire. Slavoj Zizek, Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lacan (But Were Afraid to Ask Hitchcock) (London and New York: Verso, 1992), pp. 186–7.
James Sallis, Difficult Lives: Jim Thompson, David Goodis, Chester Himes (New York: Gryphon Books, 1993), p. 19. When Thompson died in 1977, all of his novels were out of print in the United States. Only in France had they remained generally available. He was not even one of the writers adapted for the screen: until the 1970s, Thompson’s only connection with Hollywood film noir was his role in scripting Stanley Kubrick’s 1956 film, The Killing, an adaptation of one of Lionel White’s caper novels, Clean Break (1955).
Robert C. Elliott, The Power of Satire: Magic, Ritual, Art (Princeton, NJ: Prince-ton University Press, 1960, 1972), pp. 3–15.
Frederic Wertham, Dark Legend: a Study in Murder (London: Victor Gollancz, 1947), quoted in Seltzer, p. 161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Lee Horsley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Horsley, L. (2009). Fatal Men. In: The Noir Thriller. Crime Files Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280755_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280755_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-21886-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28075-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)