Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

These Pages Have Been Regulated for You: Issues Arising from the Governance of Markets by NGOs

  • Chapter
Evaluating Transnational NGOs

Abstract

The pages you are holding have been regulated for you. Not by government, but by a web of organisations which are not directly accountable to you. If you are reading these words in a book, look at the inside cover. Was the pulp from a forest with socially and environmentally sound management practices? Many responsible publishers now only use paper endorsed by an international not-for-profit and nongovernmental organisation (NGO) called the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). It may say the book was printed and bound in China, in which case the factories involved may have been certified to meet the labour conditions considered acceptable by another NGO, called Social Accountability International (SAI). If you printed this on your own printer, the longevity of your colour ink cartridge is probably certified to ISO/IEC 24711:2006(E), a standard from another international private organisation, the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). If not, then unfortunately it might have run out before you finished printing our conclusions. Which would be a shame, as you would not read how these webs of highly private authority are beginning to govern markets across the globe in ways that are both useful and problematic, and how, in order to enhance both economic efficiencies and democratic principles, we need to open them up to greater public scrutiny and participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • K. Abbott and D. Snidal (2006) The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State, Working paper, Global Governance Project (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Enterprise Institute (AEI) (2003) We’re Not from the Government, but We’re Here to Help You. Nongovernmental Organizations: The Growing Power of an Unelected Few, Conference programme, 11 June, available at http://www.aei.org/events/eventID.329filter./event_detail.asp, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Arts (2003) Non-State Actors in Global Governance: A Power Analysis, paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, 28 March–2 April, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Bakker (2002) Fiscal Policy, Accountability and Voice: The Example of Gender Responsive Budget Initiatives, Human Development Report Office, Occasional Paper (New York: UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bendell (ed.) (2000) Terms for Endearment: Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development (Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bendell (2004) Barricades and Boardrooms: A Contemporary History of the Corporate Accountability Movement, Programme Paper 13 (Geneva: UNRISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bendell and X. Font (2004) ‘Which Tourism Rules? Green Standards and GATS’, Annals of Tourism Research, 31, 1, pp. 139–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Bendell (2005) ‘In Whose Name? The Accountability of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Development in Practice, 15, 3/4, pp. 362–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Brodhad (2006) ‘Sustainable Development Strategies: Tools for Policy Coherence’, Natural Resources Forum, 30, 2, pp. 136–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (BMELV) (2009) http://www.bmelv.de/ (homepage), date accessed 30 June 2009.

  • P. G. Cerny (1999) ‘Globalization and the Erosion of Democracy’, European Journal of Political Research, 36, 5, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Clapp (2005) ‘Environmental Governance for Corporate Responsibility and Accountability’, Global Environmental Politics, 5, 3, pp. 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Clapp (2008) ‘The Privatisation of Global Environmental Governance: ISO 14000 and the Developing World’, in D. L. Levy and Newell (eds) The Business of Global Environmental Governance (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 223–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Colchester (1993) ‘Forest Peoples and Sustainability’, in M. Colchester and L. Lohman (eds) The Struggle for Land and the Fate of the Forests (London: Latin American Bureau).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Counsell and K. Loraas (2002) Trading in Credibility: The Myth and Reality of the FSC, Rainforest Foundation (UK-NO), available at http://www.rainforestfoundationuk.org/files/trading.pdf, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. C. Cutler (2001) ‘Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organization: A Crisis of Legitimacy’, Review of International Studies, 27, 2, pp. 133–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Dingwerth (2008) ‘North-South Parity in Global Governance: The Affirmative Procedures of the Forest Stewardship Council’, Global Governance, 14, 1, pp. 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Eberlein and D. Kerwer (2002) Theorising the New Modes of European Union Governance, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 6, 5, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=307521, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Ebrahim (2003a) ‘Accountability in Practice: Mechanisms for NGOs’, World Development, 31, 5, pp. 813–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Ebrahim (2003b) ‘Making Sense of Accountability: Conceptual Perspectives for Northern and Southern Nonprofits’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14, 2, pp. 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2006) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005, available at http://www.fao.org/forestry/foris/data/fra2005/kf/common/GlobalForestA4-ENsmall.pdf, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) (2009a) Vision and Mission, available at http://www.fsc.org/vision_mission.html, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Stewartship Council (FSC) (2009b) Facts and Figures, available at http://www.fsc.org/facts-figures.html, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Fuchs (2006) Private Actors in Tropical Deforestation Governance, Wittenberg-Zentrum für Globale Ethik, Diskussionspapier 2006/2, available at http://www.wcge.org/downloads/DP_2006–2_Fuchs_-_Private_Actors_in_Tropical_Deforestation_Governance.pdf, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gereffi (1999) ‘International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain’, Journal of International Economics, 48, 1, pp. 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. M. Goetz and R. Jenkins (2002) Voice, Accountability and Development: The Emergence of a New Agenda, Human Development Report Background Paper (New York: UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Grande and L. W. Pauly (2005) ‘Reconstituting Political Authority: Sovereignty, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy in a Transnational Order’, in E. Grande and L. W. Pauly (eds) Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-First Century (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace International (2008) Holding the Line with FSC, Summary Report (vol. 1) November 2008, available at http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/files/pdfs/forests/HoldingtheLine_LR_ENG.pdf, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Gunninghan and P. Grabowsky (1998) Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Hammond and J. L. Lash (2000) ‘Cyber Activism: The Rise of Civil Accountability and its Consequences for Governance’, Information Impact Magazine, May, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Haufler (1993) ‘Crossing the Boundary between Public and Private: International Regimes and Non-state Actors’, in V. Rittberger (ed.) Regime Theory and International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 94–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Haufler (2001) A Public Role for the Private Sector (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements (IFOAM) (2009) available at www.ifoam.org (homepage), date accessed 30 June 2009.

  • International Standards Organisation (ISO) (2008) The ISO Survey of Certifications — 2007, Edition 17, available at http://www.iso.org/iso/publications_and_eproducts/management_standards_publications.htm#PUB100042, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standards Organisation (ISO) (2009), http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm (homepage), date accessed 30 June 2009.

  • The International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling Alliance (ISEAL) (2009) Verification, available at http://www.isealalliance.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.viewPage&pageId=499&parentID=490&nodeID=1, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. O. Keohane and J. S. Nye (2000) ‘Introduction’, in J. S. Nye and J. D. Donahue (eds) Governance in a Globalizing World (Washington DC: The Brookings Institution), pp. 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. J. Kobrin (1998) ‘Back to the Future: Neomedievalism and the Postmodern Digital World Economy’, Journal of International Affairs, 51, 2, pp. 361–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Lister (2003) ‘NGO Legitimacy: Technical Issue or Social Construct?’, Critique of Anthropology, 23, 2, pp. 175–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. D. McDowell and P. E. Steinberg (2001) ‘Non-State Governance and the Internet: Civil Society and the ICANN’, Info — The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media, 3, 4, pp. 279–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. McKelvey (2001) ‘ISO 26000: How the New Standard for Social Responsibility will Impact on the Role of Management Consultants’, International Journal, Faculty of Commerce, St Mary’s University, available at http://www.cmc-canada.ca/Member_Benefits/documents/cNotes-Nov07_000.pdf, date accessed 20 January 2009.

  • D. F. Murphy and J. Bendell (1999) Partners in Time? Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development, Discussion Paper 109 (Geneva: UNRISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Myers (1992) The Primary Source: Tropical Forests and Our Future (London: W. W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Nader (2003) (A)n (E)gotistical (I)nstitution, available at www.Tompaine.com, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Newell and S. Bellour (2002) Mapping Accountability: Origins, Contexts and Implications for Development, IDS Working Paper 168 (Falmer, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Institute (2002) International NGO Network on ISO, brochure (Oakland: Pacific Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pierre (ed.) (2000) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Governance (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Ponte (2003) Standards and Sustainability in the Coffee Sector: A Global Value Chain Approach, paper prepared for the Sustainable Commodity Initiative (Geneva: International Institute for Sustainable Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Potoski and A. Prakash (2005). ‘Covenants with Weak Swords: ISO 14001 and Facilities’ Environmental Performance’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 4, pp. 745–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Prakash and M. Potoski (2006) The Voluntary Environmentalists: Green Clubs, ISO 14001 and Voluntary Regulations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Prieto (2002) ‘US Monitoring Sees No Evil’, in CAWN Central America Report (London: Central American Women’s Network (CAWN)).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Przeworski, S. Stokes and B. Manin (eds) (1999) Democracy, Accountability and Representation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Repetto and M. Gillis (1988) Public Policies and the Misuse of Forest Resources (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • G. Ritzer (1993) The McDonaldization of Society (Newbury Park: Pine Forge Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. G. Ruggie (2004) ‘Reconstituting the Global Public Domain — Issues, Actors, and Practices’, European Journal of International Relations, 10, 4, pp. 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Scholte (2002) ‘Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance’, Global Governance, 8, 3, pp. 281–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Scholte (2003) Protecting the Rights and Addressing the Responsibilities of Nongovernmental Organisations, summary report, unpublished paper (Conventry, UK: Warwick University).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Scott (2002) ‘Private Regulation of the Public Sector: A Neglected Facet of Contemporary Governance’, Journal of Law and Society, 29, 1, pp. 56–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Seferian (2009) Telephone interview with Avedis Seferian, Director of Compliance Administration, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), Arlington, VA, US, 25 Feburary 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Serafinas and J. Ruzevicius (2007) ‘The Development of Socially Responsible Business in Lithuania’, Engineering Economics, 1, 51, pp. 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Steger (2000) ‘Environmental Management Systems: Empirical Evidence and Further Perspectives’, European Management Journal, 18, 1, pp. 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Utting (2002) ‘Regulating Business via Multi-stakeholder Initiatives: A Preliminary Assessment’, Voluntary Approaches to Corporate Responsibility: Readings and Resource Guide (Geneva: NGLS/UNRISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Vermeulen (2000) ‘Naar een Schonere Productie’, in P. Driessen and P. Glasbergen (eds) Milieu, Samenleving en Beleid (Den Haag: Elsevier), pp. 329–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Viana, J. Ervin, R. Donovan, C. Elliott and H. Gholz (eds) (1996) Certification of Forest Products: Issues and Perspectives (Washington DC: Island Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Vogel (2007) ‘The Private Regulation of Global Government’, in W. Mattli and N. Woods (eds) The Politics of Global Regulation, forthcoming 2009, 2007 version available at http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/faculty/pdf/vogelarticle2.pdf, date accessed 10 August 2009.

  • D. Vogel (2008) ‘Private Global Business Regulation’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11, pp. 261–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Webb (2002) Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Ottawa: Carleton University).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Wood (2004) The Role of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in Governing Environmental Conflict and Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries: Questions for Research, presented at International Congress on Environmental Law: Property, Conflict and Environment, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia, 25 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. D. Wolf (2001) Private Actors and the Legitimacy of Governance beyond the State, unpublished paper prepared for the Workshop on Governance and Democratic Legitimacy, ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Grenoble, 6–11 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP) (2009a) Board and Staff, available at http://www.wrapapparel.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=5, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP) (2009b) Participating Organisations, available at http://www.wrapapparel.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=4, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP) (2009c) View Monitors by Country, available at http://apollo.worlddata.com/wrap/viewMonitorCountry-Action.do, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP) (2009d), WRAP to Partake at Sourcing at MAGIC’ in Las Vegas, available at www.wrapcompliance.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=86, date accessed 30 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Zadek (2003) ‘From Fear and Loathing to Social Innovation’, Alliance, 8, 4, pp. 21–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Zarrilli (1999) WTO Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement: Issues for Developing Countries (Geneva: South Centre).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jem Bendell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Phyllida Jay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Bendell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany

    Jens Steffek (Professor) (Professor)

  2. Research Centre ‘Transformations of the State’, University of Bremen, Germany

    Kristina Hahn (Senior Research Fellow) (Senior Research Fellow)

Copyright information

© 2010 Jem Bendell, Phyllida Jay and Mark Bendell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bendell, J., Jay, P., Bendell, M. (2010). These Pages Have Been Regulated for You: Issues Arising from the Governance of Markets by NGOs. In: Steffek, J., Hahn, K. (eds) Evaluating Transnational NGOs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230277984_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation