Advertisement

Reenactment and Neo-Realism

Chapter
Part of the Reenactment History book series (REH)

Abstract

What are we to do about reenactment? Here’s a term that seems to cover a multitude of sins and a myriad of forms — the Christian sacrament of communion, the activities of societies for creative anachronism, Shakespeare’s history plays, movies about the Alamo, art forgeries, a lot of pornography, most scientific experiments. Perhaps it is better to ask why supposedly sane academics have come to be interested in or pre-occupied by reenactment. One easy answer is to say of reenactment, as of sexually transmitted disease, that there is a lot more of it about nowadays. But reenactment has been around for 200 years or so. Its forms and frequency may have fluctuated but it has been a general feature of the culture of modernity, with its progressive view of history which figures change as both progress and loss. (Think for example of nineteenth and early twentieth-century world fairs, almost all of which contained not just evidences of modernity, but reenactments of the savage and the primitive).1

Keywords

Ordinary Life American Soldier Distance Elimination Linear Narrative Amateur Enthusiast 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    H. Garfinkel (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  2. S. Baker (2002) The Ship: Retracing Captain Cook’s Endeavour Voyage (London: BBC).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    J. Lamb (2008) ‘Historical Re-enactment, Extremity and Passion’, The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation, 49:3, 51–62.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    For an excellent account of the debate, see L. Re (1990) Calvino and the Age of Neo-Realism: Fables of Estrangement (Stanford University Press: Stanford), especially Chapters 1–3.Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    M. Jay (2005) Songs of Experience: Modern American and European Variations on a Universal Theme (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press), pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    K. Kosik (1976) Dialectics of the Concrete: A Study on the Problems of Man and the World (Dordrecht, Holland; Boston: D. Reidel), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 11.
    T. Downing (2004) ‘Bringing the Past to the Small Screen’ in D. Cannadine (ed.) History and the Media (Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 17.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    J. Appleton (1975) The Experience of Landscape (London: Wiley), p. 73.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    R. Darnton (24 June 2004) ‘It Happened One Night’, New York Review of Books, 51:11.Google Scholar
  10. C. Gallagher and S. Greenblatt (2001) Practicing New Historicism (Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press), pp. 54–6.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    I. Calvino (1998) The Path to the Spiders’ Nests, trans. A. Colquhoun, rev. M. McLaughlin (London: Jonathan Cape), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    R. Rossellini, (1992 [1952]) ‘A Discussion of Neorealism’ reprinted in R. Rossellini, My Method: Writings and Interviews, ed. A. Apra, trans. A. Cancogni (New York: Marsilio), p. 41Google Scholar
  13. D. Forgacs, S. Lutton, and G. Nowell-Smith (2000) Roberto Rossellini. Magician of the Real (London: British Film Institute), pp. 39, 151.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    R. Stam (2000) Film Theory: An Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell), p. 73.Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    For Zavattini’s views, see Cesare Zavattini, Valentina Fortichiari, Mino Argentieri, Gian Piero Brunetta (eds) (2002) Cinema: Diario cinematografico Neorealismo ecc. (Milan: Classici Bompiani), especially pp. 741–69.Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    A. Dalle Vacche (1992) The Body in the Mirror: Shapes of History in Italian Cinema (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 102Google Scholar
  17. P. Brunette (1983) ‘Unity and Difference in Paisan’, Studies in the Literary Imagination, 16, pp. 91–111.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    For Christian neo-realism, see T. Gallagher (1988) ‘NR=MC2: Rossellini, “Neo-Realism”, and Croce’, Film History, 2, pp. 87–97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Brewer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations