Advertisement

From Realism to the Affective Turn: An Agenda

Chapter
  • 303 Downloads
Part of the Reenactment History book series (REH)

Abstract

Ever since the late eighteenth century when new forms of visual entertainment claimed to be able to use technology to replicate or simulate the literal details of nature, scholars, poets and intellectuals have bemoaned the increasing dominance of the realist aesthetic. Classicists such as Sir Joshua Reynolds and Romantics such as Samuel Coleridge found the practice of literalist simulation to be debased and disgusting. It demanded merely mechanical competence, eliminated the vital creative role of the artist’s idealising imagination, and appealed to uncultivated tastes attracted by the sensational wonders of the technical facsimile. Art lost its age-old raison d’être if it became indistinguishable from literal nature.

Keywords

Late Eighteenth Century Reality Television Affective Turn Imaginative Process Somatic Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    R. Barthes ([1968] 1982) ‘The Reality Effect’ in French Literary Theory Today: A Reader, ed. T. Todorov (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 11–17Google Scholar
  2. U. Eco (1986) Travels in Hyperreality: Essays (San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich)Google Scholar
  3. J. Baudrillard (1995) Simulacra and Simulation (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Dening (1992) Mr Bligh’s Bad Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 4–5Google Scholar
  5. M. H. Nielsen (1981) ‘Re-Enactment and Reconstruction in Collingwood’s Philosophy of History’, History and Theory, 20:, p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Samuel (1995) Theatres of Memory (London: Verso), pp. 175–6.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See R. Pearce (2003) ‘University History’, History Today, 53:8, p. 54.Google Scholar
  8. T. Hunt (2006) ‘Reality, Identity and Empathy: The Changing Face of Social History Television’, Journal of Social History, 39:3, pp. 843–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chapter 1 of B. Gibbon (2005) The Colony: The Book from the Popular SBS Living History Series (Sydney: Random House)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. G. Collingwood ([1946] 1971) The Idea of History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Designed by Scotland-based Traffic Games and released in 2004, ‘JFK Reloaded’ is described as a ‘3-D, First-Person Perspective, “Assassination Simulator”’. The player sits in the infamous Texas book repository with a gun and from the same vantage point as Lee Harvey Oswald attempts to replicate the magic bullet. Initially a cash prize was offered to anyone who could do so. According to the game designers it was intended to silence conspiracy theorists. See http://www.cool.com.au/computers-technology/personal-computers/jfk-reloaded-revisited-20060414256/. We are grateful to Lucinda Mathieson for this reference. See also J. de Groot (2006) ‘Empathy and Enfranchisement: Popular Histories’, Rethinking History, 10:3, pp. 391–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Rejack (2007) ‘Toward a Virtual Re-enactment of History: Video Games and the Recreation of the Past’, Rethinking History, 11:3, pp. 411–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    M. Foucault (1977) ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’ in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, ed. D. Bouchard (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), p. 140.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    R. Williams ([1976] 1983) Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, ed., rev. and expanded (London: Fontana Paperbacks, Flamingo), p. 258.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Carlyle (1872–3) History of Friedrich II of Prussia, called Frederick the Great, vol. 2 (London: Chapman and Hall,), p. 558.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    T. Carlyle (1868) On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History (London: Chapman and Hall), p. 60.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    V. Agnew (2007) ‘History’s Affective Turn: Historical Re-enactment and Its Work in the Present’, Rethinking History 11:3, p. 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Cook (2004) ‘The Use and Abuse of Historical Re-enactment: Thoughts on Recent Trends in Public History’, Criticism, 46:3, pp. 487–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 20.
    See I. McCalman (2004) ‘The Little Ship of Horrors: Re-Enacting Extreme History’, Criticism, 46:3, pp. 477–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Baker (2002) The Ship: Retracing Cook’s Endeavour Voyage (London: BBC Worldwide)Google Scholar
  21. A. Cook (2004) ‘Sailing on The Ship: Re-enactment and the Quest for Popular History’, History Workshop Journal, 57, pp. 247–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    P. Connerton (1989) How Societies Remember (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 22.
    See I. Anstruther (1963) The Knight and the Umbrella: An Account of the Eglinton Tournament, 1839 (London: G. Bles).Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    Lamb has outlined this typology at numerous conferences and seminars since 2001. It appears in published form in his most recent book. See J. Lamb (2009) The Evolution of Sympathy in the Long Eighteenth Century (London: Pickering and Chatto), p. 137.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    Lamb, The Evolution of Sympathy, p. 139; see T. Horwitz (1998) Confederates in the Attic, p. 8. See also D. Hall (1994) ‘Civil War Reenactors and the Postmodern Sense of history’, Journal of American Culture, 17:3, pp. 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    See N. Elias (2000) The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Boal (2002) Games for Actors and Non-Actors (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  28. S. Magelssen (2006) ‘Making History in the Second Person: Post-Touristic Considerations for Living Historical Interpretation’, Theatre Journal, 58, pp. 291–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R. Blackson (2007) ‘Once More... With Feeling: Re-enactment and Contemporary Art and Culture’, Art Journal, 61:1, pp. 36–7Google Scholar
  30. 28.
    R. Rosenstone (1995) Visions of the Past: The Challenge of Film to our Modern Idea of History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    See for example S. Macintyre and A. Clark (2003) The History Wars (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press).Google Scholar
  32. S. Gapps (2003) ‘Authenticity Matters: Historical Re-enactment and Australian Attitudes to the Past’, Australian Cultural History 23, pp. 105–16Google Scholar
  33. A. Schwarz (2007) ‘Not This Year! Reenacting Contested Pasts Aboard The Ship’, Rethinking History, 11: pp. 427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 31.
    The same is true of other disciplines. Drawing on the work of Michael Taussig some social anthropologists employ what they call an ‘intuitive’ approach in the face of fraught fieldwork conditions. Monique Skidmore, for example, has argued that the way to study the lives of those who live in an oppressive regime is to place yourself in danger alongside your subject and write about how you feel. To understand the ‘affective dimensions of dictatorship’, she writes of working in the field in Myanmar, ‘I intuit the experiences of the Burmese people I have come to know well’. Her terror, she claims, allows her to experience theirs intuitively without having to name them. See M. Skidmore (2003) ‘Darker than Midnight: Fear, Vulnerability, and Terror making in Urban Burma (Myanmar)’, American Ethnologist, 30:1, pp. 5, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 34.
    Cited in E. Kerridge] (1951) ‘Ridge and Furrow and Agrarian History’, Economic History Review, New Series, 4:1, p. 14 anCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 35.
    R. Holmes (1996) Footsteps: Adventures of a Romantic Biographer (New York: Vintage Books).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Iain McCalman and Paul A. Pickering 2010

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations