Advertisement

Loutherbourg’s Simulations: Reenactment and Realism in Late-Georgian Britain

Chapter
  • 257 Downloads
Part of the Reenactment History book series (REH)

Abstract

On 28 June 2005 Queen Elizabeth formally reviewed 167 ships from Britain’s Royal Navy fleet plus some 30 international naval vessels as they conducted a sail-past in the Solent at Spithead near Plymouth. Part of a year-long series of events to commemorate the two-hundredth anniversary of the Battle of Trafalgar, the review was a massive, popular pageant, pre-advertised in British tourist publicity for several years in advance, attended on the day by 300,000 holidaymakers, and watched on subsequent television broadcasts by millions all over the globe.1 According to press and public relations releases, the Spithead naval review was part of an ancient and proud British naval tradition. Though informal fleet reviews were said to go back 600 years, the first formal Spithead Review had been undertaken in October 1772 before George III, and had been replicated with increasing pomp and circumstance by successive British monarchs ever since. In all the torrent of hype no one mentioned, however, that George Ill’s Spithead Review could also boast another type of primacy: it had been the first ever visual simulation and mass-media reenactment of modern history.

Keywords

Military Camp Marine Painter Dramatic Work British Artist Biographical Dictionary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    See J. Lamb (2009) ‘Historical Re-enactment, Extremity and Passion’, Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation, 49:3, pp. 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 3.
    G. D’Arcy Wood (2001) The Shock of the Real: Romanticism and Visual Culture, 1760–1860 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    By far the best analysis of Garrick’s and Loutherbourg’s stage innovations is C. Baugh (1987) ‘Philip James de Loutherbourg and the Early Pictorial Theatre: Some Aspects of its Cultural Context’, in J. Redmond (ed.) The Theatrical Space (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 99–128.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    R. G. Allen (1965) ‘Topical Scenes for Pantomime’, Education Theatre Journal, 17:4, pp. 289–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 6.
    For Dominic Serres the Elder, see P. H. Highfill Jr, A. Kalman Burnim and E. A. Langhans (1991) A Biographical Dictionary of Actors, Actresses, Musicians, Dancers, Managers & Other Stage Personnel in London, 1660–1800, vol. 13 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press), pp. 256–7.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    For Merlin, see A. French, M. Wright and F. Palmer (1985) John Joseph Merlin: The Ingenious Mechanick (Kenwood: Iveagh Bequest, Greater London Council)Google Scholar
  7. G. Wood (2002) Living Dolls. A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical Life (London: Faber), pp. xii–xviGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Metzner (1998) Crescendo of the Virtuoso. Spectacles, Skill, and Self-Promotion in Paris during the Age of Revolution (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press), pp. 167–177.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    C. Dibdin (1803) The Professional Life of Charles Dibdin, 4 vols (London: The Author), pp. 73–5Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    Morning Chronicle (3 August 1778) cited in G. Russell (1995) The Theatres of War: Performance, Politics, and Society, 1793–1815 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 16.
    For the play, see C. Price (ed.) (1973) The Dramatic Works of Richard Sheridan, vol. 2, (Oxford: Clarendon), pp. 707–50Google Scholar
  12. R. W. Jones (Winter 2002) ‘Sheridan and the Theatre of Patriotism: Staging Dissent During the War for America’, Eighteenth-Century Life, 26, pp. 24–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Conway (1997) ‘Locality, Metropolis and Nation: The Impact of the Military Camps in England during the American War’, History, 82, pp. 547–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 19.
    J. Loftis (1976) Sheridan and the Drama of Georgian England (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 120–23Google Scholar
  15. 34.
    By An Artist (1780) A Candid Review of the Exhibition (Being the Twelfth) of the Royal Academy no. XV (London: H. Reynell), p. 14.Google Scholar
  16. 37.
    R. D. Altick (1978) The Shows of London (Cambridge, MA: Bellknap Press), p. 97.Google Scholar
  17. 39.
    R. G. Allen (1961) ‘The Wonders of Derbyshire’, Theatre Survey, 2, pp. 54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Daniels (1993) ‘Joseph Wright and the Spectacle of Power’, in Fields of Vision: Landscape Imagery and National Identity in England and the United States (Cambridge: Polity Press), p. 59.Google Scholar
  19. 42.
    Derbyshire Man (1779) An Account of the Wonders of Derbyshire, as Introduced in the Pantomime Entertainment at the Theatre-Royal, Drury Lane, by a Derbyshire Man (London: G. Bigg), pp. 8–23.Google Scholar
  20. 48.
    I. McCalman (2001) ‘Spectacles of Knowledge: Omai as Ethnographic Travelogue’, in M. Hetherington (ed.) Cook and Omai. The Cult of the South Seas (Canberra: National Library of Australia), p. 11Google Scholar
  21. N. J. D. Hazelton (2002) ‘Green to the Very Door: Painted Landscape on the Nineteenth-Century Stage’, Theatre History Studies, 22, pp. 115–36.Google Scholar
  22. 52.
    H. Meriton (1786) An Interesting and Authentic Account of the Loss of the Halsewell. East-India-Man, with All Its Dreadful Circumstances (London: W. Bailey), p. 9.Google Scholar
  23. T. S. R. Boase (1959) ‘Shipwrecks in English Romantic Painting’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 22, pp. 336–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 55.
    W. H. Pyne (1824) Wine and Walnuts; Or, After Dinner Chit-Chat by Ephraim Hardcastle, Citizen and Dry-Salter, vol. 1, 2nd edn (London), p. 292.Google Scholar
  25. 57.
    D. Hill (1965) Mr. Gillray, the Caricaturist: A Biography (London: Phaidon).Google Scholar
  26. 59.
    The details of the contract between Loutherbourg and Messrs V. and R. Green and Christian de Mechel are found in the appendix to Anthony Griffith’s article. See A. Griffiths (December 2003) ‘The Contract for the Grand Attack on Valenciennes’, Print Quarterly, 20:4, pp. 378–9.Google Scholar
  27. 60.
    P. Harrington (1993) British Artists and War: The Face of Battle in Paintings and Prints, 1700–1914 (London: Greenhill Books; Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books in association with Brown University Library, Rhode Island), p. 70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Iain McCalman 2010

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations