Skip to main content

Direct Rule and Power Sharing,1972–74

  • Chapter
Northern Ireland 1968–2008
  • 467 Accesses

Abstract

The prorogation of the Stormont parliament and the introduction of direct rule from London in March 1972 transformed the political context in Northern Ireland and contributed to the further radicalisation of the North’s politics. Westminster’s intervention in removing Northern Ireland state structures established the essential factors that framed the long-term marginalisation of the North’s politics and its protracted political impasse. It profoundly influenced the mobilisation of embedded ethnic identities, the entrenchment of political policy-making and policy direction and the polarisation of communal relations. It was the very lack of long-term planning and the absence of an articulate vision of what would replace the Northern Irish state apparatus that was instrumental in that mobilisation as both nationalist and unionist actors reacted to perceptions of changing opportunities and new threats to their status. Those reactions quickly radicalised each community, whose knock-on effects tied politicians to specific agendas and, in the process, entrenched communal division.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Austin Currie, All Hell Will Break Lose (Dublin: O’Brien, 2004), pp. 222–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Don Anderson, Fourteen May Days: The Inside Story of the Loyalist Strike of 1974 (Dublin: Gill amp; Macmillan 1994), p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richard Bourke, Peace in Ireland: The War of Ideas (London: Pimlico, 2003), p. 217;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gillespie, ‘Sunningdale’; Hennessey, A History, p. 227; Kerr, Imposing; O’Duffy, British-Irish Relations; Jonathan Tonge, ‘From Sunningdale to the Good Friday Agreement: Creating Devolved Government in Northern Ireland’. Contemporary British History, 4(3) (2000); Walker, A History, p. 204.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Devlin, Straight Left, p. 225; Faulkner, Memoirs, p. 222; Maurice Hayes, Minority Verdict: Experiences of a Catholic Public Servant (Belfast: Blackstaff, 1995), p. 203;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Basil McIvor, Hope Deferred: Experiences of an Irish Unionist (Belfast: Blackstaff, 1998), p. 100;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Merlyn Rees, Northern Ireland: A Personal Perspective (London: Methuen, 1985), pp. 33, 90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. F. Foster, Luck and the Irish: A BriefHistory of Change c. 1970-2000 (London: Allen Lane, 2007), p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Cillian McGrattan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGrattan, C. (2010). Direct Rule and Power Sharing,1972–74. In: Northern Ireland 1968–2008. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230277045_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics