Skip to main content

Getting Rid of Keynes? A Reflection on the Recent History of Macroeconomics

  • Chapter
Keynes’s General Theory After Seventy Years

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

The title of this chapter springs from the obvious observation that the days when macroeconomics and Keynesianism were part and parcel of each other are gone. My aim in this chapter is to reflect on this process of de-Keynesianisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. and G. Debreu (1954), “Existence of Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy”, Econometrica, vol. 22, pp. 265–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhouse, R. and M. Boianovsky (2005), “Disequilibrium Macroeconomics. An episode in the Transformation of Modern Macroeconomics”, Anais do XXXIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 33th Brazilian Economics Meeting].

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. and H. Grossman (1971), “A General Disequilibrium Model of Income and Employment”, American Economic Review, vol. 61, pp. 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benassy, J.-P. (1976), “The Disequilibrium Approach to Monopolistic Price Setting and General Monopolistic Equilibrium”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 43, pp. 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. (2000), “What do We Know about Macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell did not?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 115, pp. 1375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. and N. Kiyotaki ([1987] 1991), “Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate Demand”, in Mankiw, G. and D. Romer (eds.), New Keynesian Economics, vol. 1, Imperfect Competition and Sticky Prices, Cambridge (Mass.): The M.I.T. Press, pp. 345–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. ([1988] 1997), “The Fall and Rise of Keynesian Economics”, in Snowdon, B. and H. Vane (eds.), A Macroeconomics Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 109–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, K. and A. Meltzer (1993), Money and the Economy. Issues in Monetary Analysis, Raffaele Mattioli Foundation lectures, Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, G. (1983), “Staggered Price Setting in a Utility-Maximizing Framework”, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 12, pp. 383–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarida, R., J. Gali and M. Gertler (1999), “The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 37, pp. 1661–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clower, R. ([1965] 1984), “The Keynesian Counterrevolution: A Theoretical Appraisal”, in Walker D. (ed.), Money and Markets. Essays by Robert Clower, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clower R. and A. Leijonhufvud ([1975] 1984), “The Coordination of Economic Activities: a Keynesian Perspective” in Walker D. (1984) (ed.), Money and Markets. Essays by Robert Clower, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, D. (1996) (ed.), Beyond Microfoundations: Post-Walrasian Macroeconomics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, D. (2006) (ed.), Post-Walrasian Macroeconomics: Beyond the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, H. and L. Ohanian (2004), “New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 112, pp. 779–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danthine, J.-P. (1997), “In Search of a Successor to IS-LM”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 135–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Long, B. (2000), “The Triumph of Monetarism”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 14, pp. 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, M. (1999a), “The Marshallian Market and the Walrasian Economy. Two Incompatible Bedfellows”, The Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 46, pp. 319–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, M. (1999b), “Keynes and the Marshall-Walras Divide”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought. vol. 21. no. 2 pp. 117–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, M. (2001) “Friedman and Lucas on the Phillips Curve: From a Disequilibrium to an Equilibrium Approach”, Eastern Economic Journal, vol. 27, pp. 127–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, M. (2004), Involuntary Unemployment: The Elusive Quest for A Theory, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, M. (2006), “Marshall versus Walras on Equilibrium”, in Becattini, G., M. Dardi and T. Raffaelli (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Marshall, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 237–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, M. (2007), “Did the Market-clearing Postulate Pre-exist New Classical Economics? The Case of Marshallian Theory”, The Manchester School, vol. 75, pp. 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. ([1982] 1991), “Aggregate Demand Management in Search Equilibrium”, in Mankiw, N. G. and D. Romer (eds.), New Keynesian Economics, Volume 2, Coordination Failures and Real Rigidities, Cambridge (Mass.): The M.I.T. Press, pp. 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. and J. Stiglitz (1977), “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity”, American Economic Review, vol. 67, pp. 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dostaler, G. (1998), “Friedman and Keynes: Divergences and Convergences”, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 5, pp. 317–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J. H. (1975), “Existence of Equilibrium Under Price Rigidities”, International Economic Review, vol. 16, pp. 301–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J. H. (2001), Advances in Macroeconomic Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan in Association with International Economic Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1974), “A Theoretical Framework for Monetary Analysis”, in R. J. Gordon (ed.), Milton Friedman’s monetary Framework, Chicago: Chicago University press, pp. 1–62, 132–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. ([1989]1997), “John Maynard Keynes”, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Economic Quarterly, vol. 83, pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, R. (1933) Propagation Problems and Impulse Problems in Dynamic Economics, in Economic Essays in Honour of Gustav Cassel, London: George Allen & Unwin, as reprinted in R. A. Gordon and L. R. Klein, eds. (1965). Readings in Business Cycles, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 155–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfriend, M. and R. King (1997), “The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy”, in B. Bernanke and J. Rotenberg (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997, Cambridge (Mass.): The M.I.T. Press, pp. 231–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. (1973), “On the Foundations of Monetary Theory”, in M. Parkins and A. R. Nobay (eds.), Essays in Modern Economics, London: Longman, pp. 230–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn F. and. R. Solow (1995), A Critical Essay on Modern Macroeconomic Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairault, J.-O., (1999), “Vers une nouvelle synthèse néoclassique?”, Revue d’Économie Politique, vol. 109, pp. 613–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. D. (1992), “An Interview with Milton Friedman on Methodology”, in B. Caldwell (ed.), The Philosophy and Methodology of Economics, vol. I. Edgar Elgar, pp. 216–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, R. F. ([1937] 1947), “Mr Keynes and Traditional Theory”, in S. Harris (ed.) The New Economics. Keynes Influence on Theory and Public Policy, New York: A. A. Knopf, pp. 591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. ([1982] 1991), “A Model of Imperfect Competition with Keynesian Features”, in Mankiw, G. and D. Romer (eds.), New Keynesian Economics, vol. 1, Imperfect Competition and Sticky Prices, Cambridge (Mass.): The M.I.T. Press, pp. 313–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. ([1946] 1939), Value and Capital, (second edition) Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R., ([1934] 1983), “Léon Walras”, in Classics and Moderns. Collected essays on Economic Theory vol. III, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. ([1937] 1967), “Mr Keynes and the ‘Classics’”, reprinted in Critical Essays in Monetary Theory, pp. 126–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. ([1979] 1983), “The Formation of an Economist”, in Classics and Moderns. Collected essays on Economic Theory, vol. III, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 355–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, A. and de Marchi, N. (1990), Milton Friedman, Economics in Theory and Practice, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K. (1984), “Two Types of Monetarism”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXII, pp. 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K. (1988), The New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sceptical Inquiry, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K. (2006a), “Doctor Keynes: Economic Theory in a Diagnostic Science”, in Backhouse, R. and B. Bateman (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Keynes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–97.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K. (2006b), “The Past as Future: The Marshallian Approach to Post Walrasian Econometrics”, in Colander, D. (ed.), Post-Walrasian Macroeconomics. Beyond the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, P. (1990), The Keynesian Revolution and Other Essays, Hertfordshire: Philip Allan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. (1971), “The Keynesian Revolution and the Monetarist Counterrevolution”, American Economic Review, vol. 61, pp. 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (1993), “Will the New Keynesian Macroeconomics Resurrect the IS-LM Model?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 7, pp. 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. ([1956] 1964), Economic Fluctuations in the United States, 1921–1941 (fourth edition), New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. (1948), The Keynesian Revolution, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A. (2006), “Foreword”, in D. Colander (ed.), Post-Walrasian Macroeconomics. Beyond the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. XIII–XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F. and E. Prescott (1977), “Rules rather than Discretion: the Inconsistency of Optimal Planes”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 85, pp. 473–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F. and E. Prescott (1982) “Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations”, Econometrica, vol. 50, pp. 1345–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, D. (1981), “Monetarism: An Interpretation and An Assessment”, The Economic Journal, vol. 91, pp. 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, D. (1999), Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution. Studies of the Inter-War Literature on Money, the Cycle, and Unemployment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leijonhufvud, A. (2006a), “Episodes in a Century of Macroeconomics”, in Colander, D. (ed.), Post-Walrasian Macroeconomics. Beyond the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–45.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leijonhufvud, A. (2006b), “Keynes as a Marshallian”, in Backhouse, R. and B. Bateman (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Keynes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. (2000), “IS-LM, Keynesianism, and the New Classicism”, in Backhouse, R. and A. Salanti (eds.), Macroeconomics and the Real World, vol. 2 Keynesian Economics, Unemployment and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. and C. Plosser (1983), “Real Business Cycles”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 91, pp. 39–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. Jr. ([1972] 1981), “Expectations and the Neutrality of Money”, in Studies in the Business-Cycle Theory, Cambridge (Mass.): The M.I.T. Press, pp. 66–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. Jr. ([1975] 1981), An Equilibrium Model of the Business Cycle”, in Studies in the Business-Cycle Theory, Cambridge (Mass.): The M.I.T. Press, pp. 179–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. Jr. ([1976] 1981), “Econometric Policy Evaluation: a Critique”, in Studies in the Business-Cycle Theory, Cambridge (Mass.): The M.I.T. Press, pp. 104–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. Jr. ([1978] 1981), “Unemployment Policy”, in Studies in Business Cycle Theory, Cambridge (Mass.): The M.I.T. Press, pp. 240–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1987), Models of Business Cycle, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1993), “Interview with Robert E. Lucas Jr.”, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, The Region, pp. 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R. E. Jr. and T. Sargent ([1979] 1994), “After Keynesian Macroeconomics” in Preston. R. Miller (ed.), The Rational Expectations Revolution. Readings from the Front Line, Cambridge (Mass.): The M.I.T. Press, pp. 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E. (1977), The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E. (1984), Mass Unemployment, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G. (1990), “A Quick Refreshing Course in Macroeconomics”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 28, pp. 1645–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G. (2006), “The Macroeconomist as Scientist and Engineer”, NBER, Working Paper 12349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G. and D. Romer (1991), New Keynesian Economics, Vol. I, Imperfect Competition and Sticky Prices, Vol. II, Coordination Failures and Rigidites, Cambridge (Maas.): The M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade J. ([1937] 1947), “A Simplified Model of Keynes’s System”, in Harris, S. (1947), (ed.), The New Economics. Keynes Influence on Theory and Public Policy, New York: A. A. Knopf, pp. 606–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. (1944), “Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money”, Econometrica, vol. 12, pp. 44–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negishi, T. (1987), “Tâtonnement and Recontracting” in Eatwell, J., M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, vol. II, London: Macmillan. pp. 589–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostroy, J. (1992), “Money and General Equilibrium Theory”, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance. London: Macmillan. vol. II, pp. 783–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patinkin, D. (1965), Money, Interest and Prices, (second edition), New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, R., R. Shimer, and R. Wright (2005), “Search-Theoretic Models of the Labor Market: a Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XLIII, pp. 959–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. and J. E. Stiglitz (1984), “Equilibrium Unemployment as Worker Discipline Device”, American Economic Review, vol. 74, pp. 433–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, B. and H. Vane (1996), “The Development of Modern Macroeconomics: Reflections in the Light of Johnson’s Analysis After Twenty-Five years”, Journal of Macroeconomics, vol. 18, pp. 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, B. and H. R. Vane (1998), “Transforming Macroeconomics: an Interview with Robert E Lucas Jr.”, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 5, pp. 115–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. B. (1979), “Staggered Wage Setting in a Macro Model”, American Economic Review, vol. 69, pp. 108–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1939), Statistical Testing of Business Cycle Theories, Geneva: League of Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. ([1993] 1997), “Price Flexibility and Output Stability. An Old Keynesian View” in Snowdon, B. and H. Vane (eds.), A Macroeconomics Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 135–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vercelli, A. (2000), “The Evolution of IS-LM Models: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Presuppositions”, in R. Backhouse and A. Salanti (eds.), Macroeconomics and the Real World, vol. 2 Keynesian Economics, Unemployment and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg, F. (2005), “Back to Keynes?”, CESifo Working Paper, No. 1424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras, L. (1954), Elements of Pure Economics, translated by Jaffé W., London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, R. (1983), “On the Existence of Competitive Equilibrium: 1930– 1954”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 21, pp. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. (1999), “Revolution and Evolution in Twentieth-Century Macroeconomics”, in P. Gifford (ed.), Frontiers of the Mind in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, W. (1987), Interpreting Mr Keynes. The IS-LM Enigma, London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, W. and B. Z. Zilberfarb (2000) (eds.), IS-LM and Modern Macroeconomics, Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vroey, M.D. (2010). Getting Rid of Keynes? A Reflection on the Recent History of Macroeconomics. In: Dimand, R.W., Mundell, R.A., Vercelli, A. (eds) Keynes’s General Theory After Seventy Years. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230276147_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics