Abstract
The famous opening line of L.P. Hartley’s novel The Go-Between — ‘The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there’ [1953] (1977) — might well serve as an epigraph for sociology in Britain today. Mainstream British sociology in recent times has a very patchy record of building an awareness of long-term historical processes into its analytic foci and procedures. Presentism — the unintended, tacit, and unnoticed privileging of contemporary concerns and dispositions within particular modes of analysis — rather than systematic consciousness of the (contested) contours of historical dynamics is the hegemonic scholarly modus operandi today. Although the current ubiquity in both theoretical and empirical writings of a whole series of periodising theoretical constructs — such as risk society, globalisation, late modernity, liquid modernity, network society, and so on — seem to indicate strong historical consciousness within the discipline, in fact such concepts both make possible and legitimate disengagement with historical processes. This is because they provide pre-packaged, sound-bite-friendly accounts of complex historical forces that save sociologists from engaging in some hard tasks, namely really getting to grips with historical details and complexities and with current developments in both historiography and historical sociology. In a quite acute sense, the historical imagination is dying or already dead in British sociology today. What I want to address in this chapter are both the reasons as to why this situation has come to pass and also how this state of affairs might be overcome through a resuscitation of sophisticated historical consciousness in sociological practice.
We know only a single science, the science of history.
The one thing that does not change is that at any and every time it appears that there have been ‘great changes’.
Proust
Our ignorance of history makes us libel our own times.
Flaubert
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Abrams, P. (1982) Historical Sociology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Adams, J., Clemens, E.S., and Orloff, A.S. (2005) ‘Introduction: Social Theory, Modernity and the Three Waves of Historical Sociology’, in Adams, J., Clemens, E.S., and Orloff, A.S. (eds), Remaking Modernity, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 1–73.
Anderson, P. (1974) Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: New Left Books.
Arnason, J. (2003) Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden: Brill.
Beck, U. (2000) What Is Globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bell, D. (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. London: Heinemann.
Bourdieu, P. (1992) Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998) On Television and Journalism. London: Pluto Press.
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1996) Introduction to a Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Calhoun, C. (1996) ‘The Rise and Domestication of Historical Sociology’, in McDonald, T.J. (ed.), The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, Ann Arbor: Michigan State University Press, pp. 305–37.
Calhoun, C. (1998) ‘Explanation in Historical Sociology: Narrative, General Theory, and Historically Specific Theory’, American Journal of Sociology 104 (3): 846–71.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (2003) Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. Leiden: Brill.
Elias, N. (1987) ‘The Retreat of Sociologists into the Present’, Theory, Culture and Society 4 (2): 223–47.
Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giddens, A. (1981) A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giddens, A. (1982) ‘A Reply to My Critics’, Theory, Culture and Society 1 (2): 107–13.
Giddens, A. (1985) A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Volume 2: The Nation State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, J.A. (1989) ‘They Do Things Differently There: Or, the Contribution of British Historical Sociology’, British Journal of Sociology 40 (4): 544–64.
Hartley, L.P. [ 1953 ] (1997) The Go Between. London: Penguin.
Kiser, E. and Hechter, M. (1991) ‘The Role of General Theory in Historical-Comparative Sociology’, American Journal of Sociology 97 (1): 1–30.
Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1987) The End of Organised Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Liebersohn, H. (1988) Fate and Utopia in German Sociology, 1870–1923. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mandalios, J. (2004) ‘Historical Sociology’, in Turner, B.S. (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 391–413.
Mann, M. (1986) The Sources of Social Power, Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, M. (1994) ‘In Praise of Macro-Sociology: A Reply to Goldthorpe’, British Journal of Sociology 45 (1): 37–54.
Mukerji, C. (2007) ‘Cultural Genealogy: Method for a Historical Sociology of Culture or Cultural Sociology of History’, Cultural Sociology 1 (1): 49–71.
Outhwaite, W. (2006) The Future of Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Runciman, W.G. (1989) A Treatise on Social Theory, Volume II: Substantive Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Savage, M. (2009) ‘Against Epochalism: An Anakysis of Conceptions of Change in British Sociology’, Cultural Sociology 3 (2): 217–38.
Skocpol, T. (1979) States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Somers, M.R. (1995) ‘What’s Political or Cultural about Political Culture and the Public Sphere? Toward an Historical Sociology of Concept Formation’, Sociological Theory 13 (2): 113–44.
Somers, M.R. (1996) ‘Where is Sociology after the Historic Turn?’ in McDonald, T.J. (ed.), The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, Ann Arbor: Michigan State University Press.
Steinmetz, G. (2007) ‘The Historical Sociology of Historical Sociology: Germany and the United States in the Twentieth Century’, Sociologica 3, DOI: 10.2383/25961
Sztompka, P. (1993) The Sociology of Social Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tilly, C. (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 David Inglis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Inglis, D. (2010). The Death of History in British Sociology: Presentism, Intellectual Entrepreneurship, and the Conundra of Historical Consciousness. In: Burnett, J., Jeffers, S., Thomas, G. (eds) New Social Connections. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274877_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274877_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36594-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-27487-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)