Skip to main content

The Death of History in British Sociology: Presentism, Intellectual Entrepreneurship, and the Conundra of Historical Consciousness

  • Chapter
New Social Connections

Abstract

The famous opening line of L.P. Hartley’s novel The Go-Between — ‘The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there’ [1953] (1977) — might well serve as an epigraph for sociology in Britain today. Mainstream British sociology in recent times has a very patchy record of building an awareness of long-term historical processes into its analytic foci and procedures. Presentism — the unintended, tacit, and unnoticed privileging of contemporary concerns and dispositions within particular modes of analysis — rather than systematic consciousness of the (contested) contours of historical dynamics is the hegemonic scholarly modus operandi today. Although the current ubiquity in both theoretical and empirical writings of a whole series of periodising theoretical constructs — such as risk society, globalisation, late modernity, liquid modernity, network society, and so on — seem to indicate strong historical consciousness within the discipline, in fact such concepts both make possible and legitimate disengagement with historical processes. This is because they provide pre-packaged, sound-bite-friendly accounts of complex historical forces that save sociologists from engaging in some hard tasks, namely really getting to grips with historical details and complexities and with current developments in both historiography and historical sociology. In a quite acute sense, the historical imagination is dying or already dead in British sociology today. What I want to address in this chapter are both the reasons as to why this situation has come to pass and also how this state of affairs might be overcome through a resuscitation of sophisticated historical consciousness in sociological practice.

We know only a single science, the science of history.

The one thing that does not change is that at any and every time it appears that there have been ‘great changes’.

Proust

Our ignorance of history makes us libel our own times.

Flaubert

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abrams, P. (1982) Historical Sociology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J., Clemens, E.S., and Orloff, A.S. (2005) ‘Introduction: Social Theory, Modernity and the Three Waves of Historical Sociology’, in Adams, J., Clemens, E.S., and Orloff, A.S. (eds), Remaking Modernity, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 1–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1974) Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnason, J. (2003) Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2000) What Is Globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992) Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998) On Television and Journalism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1996) Introduction to a Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (1996) ‘The Rise and Domestication of Historical Sociology’, in McDonald, T.J. (ed.), The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, Ann Arbor: Michigan State University Press, pp. 305–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (1998) ‘Explanation in Historical Sociology: Narrative, General Theory, and Historically Specific Theory’, American Journal of Sociology 104 (3): 846–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S.N. (2003) Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1987) ‘The Retreat of Sociologists into the Present’, Theory, Culture and Society 4 (2): 223–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1981) A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1982) ‘A Reply to My Critics’, Theory, Culture and Society 1 (2): 107–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1985) A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Volume 2: The Nation State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A. (1989) ‘They Do Things Differently There: Or, the Contribution of British Historical Sociology’, British Journal of Sociology 40 (4): 544–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, L.P. [ 1953 ] (1997) The Go Between. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiser, E. and Hechter, M. (1991) ‘The Role of General Theory in Historical-Comparative Sociology’, American Journal of Sociology 97 (1): 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1987) The End of Organised Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebersohn, H. (1988) Fate and Utopia in German Sociology, 1870–1923. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandalios, J. (2004) ‘Historical Sociology’, in Turner, B.S. (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 391–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1986) The Sources of Social Power, Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1994) ‘In Praise of Macro-Sociology: A Reply to Goldthorpe’, British Journal of Sociology 45 (1): 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji, C. (2007) ‘Cultural Genealogy: Method for a Historical Sociology of Culture or Cultural Sociology of History’, Cultural Sociology 1 (1): 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Outhwaite, W. (2006) The Future of Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W.G. (1989) A Treatise on Social Theory, Volume II: Substantive Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M. (2009) ‘Against Epochalism: An Anakysis of Conceptions of Change in British Sociology’, Cultural Sociology 3 (2): 217–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1979) States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M.R. (1995) ‘What’s Political or Cultural about Political Culture and the Public Sphere? Toward an Historical Sociology of Concept Formation’, Sociological Theory 13 (2): 113–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M.R. (1996) ‘Where is Sociology after the Historic Turn?’ in McDonald, T.J. (ed.), The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, Ann Arbor: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, G. (2007) ‘The Historical Sociology of Historical Sociology: Germany and the United States in the Twentieth Century’, Sociologica 3, DOI: 10.2383/25961

  • Sztompka, P. (1993) The Sociology of Social Change. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 David Inglis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Inglis, D. (2010). The Death of History in British Sociology: Presentism, Intellectual Entrepreneurship, and the Conundra of Historical Consciousness. In: Burnett, J., Jeffers, S., Thomas, G. (eds) New Social Connections. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274877_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics