Abstract
Whilst environmental sociology has been emergent over the past twenty years, our discipline has distinct difficulties grasping non-human life-worlds as properly the subject matter of sociological enquiries. Sociologists continue to write, for example, of the ‘family’ or household as if all household dwellers were human, frustrating those few of us who have undertaken empirical work on interactions between humans and the non-human animals who are so often to be found in the ‘home’. I have been interested in a variety of non-human creatures whose lives are co-constituted with our own, particularly domesticated animals who live with us, labour for us and are eaten by us. Yet in disciplinary terms, the lives of non-human species and scapes are still overwhelmingly absent or enter the scene of the social as a backdrop, a prop, a fantasy, or a rhetorical device. Yet as Donna Haraway (2008) suggests, we constantly meet other species and have histories of entangled (and often ugly) relations with them. We need, in my view, a sociology that understands these relations with non-human ‘natures’ as social and allows for critical perspectives on the power relations of species difference. These social relations with species are also cross-cut, emergent with relations of social difference that have become sociologically recognised, around ethnicity, sexuality, gender, locality, and so on.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Anderson, K. (2001) ‘The Nature of Race’, in Castree, N. and Braun, B. (eds), Social Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.
Benton, T. (1994) ‘Biology and Social Theory in the Environment Debate’, in Redclift, M. and Benton, T. (eds), Social Theory and the Global Environment. London: Routledge.
Capra, F. (1996) The Web of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter. London: Harper Collins.
Capra, F. (2003) The Hidden Connections: A Science for Sustainable Living. London: Flamingo.
Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume I. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1997) The Power ofIdentity: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume II. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1998) End of Millenium: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume III. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castree, N. (2001) ‘Marxism, Capitalism and the Production of Nature’, in Castree, N. and Braun, B. (eds), Social Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.
Catton, W.R. and Dunlap, R.E. (1980) ‘A New Paradigm for Post-exuberant Sociology’ American Behavioral Scientist 24 (1): 15–47.
Catton, W.R. and Dunlap, R.E. (1993) ‘The Development, Current Status and Probable Future of Environmental Sociology: Toward an Ecological Sociology’, The Annals of the International Institute of Sociology 3: 263–84.
Cilliers, P. (1998) Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. London: Routledge.
Cilliers, P. (2007) ‘The Philosophical Importance of Thinking Complexity’, in Cilliers, P. (ed.), Thinking Complexity: Complexity and Philosophy Volume 1, Mansfield MA: ISCE Publishing.
Cronon, W. (1995) ‘The Trouble with Wilderness, or Getting Back to the Wrong Nature’, in Cronon, W. (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York: W.W. Norton.
Cudworth, E. (2003) Environment and Society London: Routledge.
Cudworth, E. (2005) Developing Ecofeminist Theory: The Complexity of Difference. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cudworth, E. (2007) ‘Complexity Theory and the Sociology of Natures’, International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 2 (3): 351–8.
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S.C. (2009) More than a metaphor? Complexity in the social sciences, paper given to the 4th International Conference on Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, University of Athens, Greece 4–7 July.
Dickens, P. (1992) Society and Nature: Towards a Green Social Theory. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Dickens, P. (1996) Reconstructing Nature: Alienation, Emancipation and the Division ofLabour. London: Routledge.
Dunlap, R. (2002) ‘Paradigms, Theories and Environmental Sociology’, in Dunlap, R. Buttel, F. Dickens, P. and Gijswijt, A. (eds), Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights. Lanham Md.: Rowland and Littlefield, pp. 329–50.
Earnest, D.C. and Rosenau, J.N. (2006) ‘Signifying Nothing? What Complex Systems Theory Can and Cannot Tell Us about Global Politics’, in Harrison, N.E. (ed.), Complexity in World Politics: Concepts and Methods of a New Paradigm. New York: SUNY.
Eckersley, R. (1992) Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach. London: University College London Press.
Gell-Mann, M. (1994) The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. New York: Freeman and Co.
Gell-Mann, M. (1995)‘What is Complexity?’ Complexity 1(4):16–19.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.
Guha, R. (1997) ‘The Environmentalism of the Poor’, in Guha, R. and Martinez-Alier, J. (eds), Varieties of Environmentalism. London: Earthscan.
Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (eds) (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington: Island Press.
Haraway, D. (1992) ‘The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others’, in L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P.A. Treichler (eds), Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2008) When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2001) ‘Chaos and Complexity: Their Bearing on Policy Research’, Social Issues 1(2): http://www.whb.co.uk/socialissues/harvey/htm.
Hayles, N.K. (1990) Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hayles, N.K. (ed.) (1991) Chaos and Order: Complex Dynamics in Literature and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R., Brock, W.A., and Grunderson, L.H. (2002) Chapter 15, ‘Discoveries for Sustainable Futures’, in Grunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press pp. 395–418.
Holling, C.S., Gunderson, L.H., and Ludwig, D. (2002) ‘In quest of a theory of adaptive change’, in Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington: Island Press.
Holling, C.S., Gunderson, L.H., and Peterson, G.D. (2002) ‘Sustainability and panarchies’, in Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington: Island Press.
Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kauffman, S.A. (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kauffman, S.A. (1995) At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. London: Viking.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Latour, B. (2000)‘When Things Strike Back: A Possible Contribution of “Science Studies” to the Social Sciences’, British Journal of Sociology 51(1): 107–23.
López, J. and Scott, J. (2000). Social Structure. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Lovelock, J. ( 2000 The Ages of Gaia: A Biography of Our Living Earth, second edi-tion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lukes, S. (1973) Power: A Radical View. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Margulis, L. and Sagan, D. (1986) Microcosmos. New York: Summit.
Martell, L. (1994) Ecology and Society: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
Maturana, H. and Varela, F.J. (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McCall, L. (2005) ‘The Complexity of Intersectionality’, Signs 30 (3): 171–80.
McLennan, G. (2006)‘Complexity Rules? Four complications, three dangers, two conclusions’ paper given to Symposium on Complexity Theory, University of Edinburgh, 1 December 2006.
Also see G. McLennan, 2006, Sociological Cultural Studies: Reflexitivity and Positivity in the Human Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mcnaghten, P. and Urry, J. (1998) Contested Natures. London: Sage.
Merchant C. (1980) The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Mies, M. (1993) ‘The Need for a New Vision: The Subsistence Perspective’, in Mies, M. and Shiva, V. (eds), Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books.
Morin, E. (2007)‘Restricted Complexity, General Complexity’, in Gerhenson, C., Aerts, D., and Edmonds, B. (eds), Worldviews, Science and Us: Philosophy and Complexity. London: World Scientific Publishing.
Murdock, J. (2001) ‘Ecologising Sociology: Actor-Network Theory, Co-constructionism and the Problem of Human Exemptionalism’, Sociology 35 (1): 111–33.
Naess, A. (1989) Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1960) Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.
Peet, R. and Watts, M. (1996) ‘Liberation Ecology: Development, Sustainability, and Environment in an Age of Market Triumphalism’, in Peet, R. and Watts, M. (eds), Liberation Ecologies. London: Routledge.
Plumwood, V. (1993) Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
Plumwood, V. (1994) ‘The Ecopolitics Debate and the Politics of Nature’, in Warren, K. (ed.), Ecological Feminism. London: Routledge.
Prigogine, I. (1980) From Being to Becoming. San Francisco: Freeman.
Prigogine, I. (1989) ‘The Philosophy of Instability’, Futures 21 (4): 396–400.
Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1984) Order Out of Chaos. New York: Bantam.
Scheffer, M., Westley, F., Brock, W.A., and Holmgren, M. (2002) ‘Dynamic Interaction of Societies and Eco-Systems– Linking Theories from Ecology, Economy and Sociology’, in Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington: Island Press.
Soper, K. (1995) What is Nature? Oxford: Blackwell.
Urry, J. (2003) Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity.
Walby, S. (2007) ‘Complexity Theory, Systems Theory and Multiple Intersected Inequalities’, Philosophy of Social Sciences 37 (4): 449–70.
Wallerstein, I. (1979) The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Westley, F., Carpenter, S., Brock, W.A., Holling, C.S., and Gunderson, L.H. (2002) ‘Why Systems of People and Nature are Not Just Social and Ecological Systems’, in Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington: Island Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Erika Cudworth
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cudworth, E. (2010). Complexity, ‘Nature’ and Social Domination: Towards a Sociology of Species Relations. In: Burnett, J., Jeffers, S., Thomas, G. (eds) New Social Connections. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274877_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274877_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36594-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-27487-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)