Skip to main content

Sociology and the Sociological Imagination: Reflections on, Disciplinarity and Intellectual Specialisation

  • Chapter
Book cover New Social Connections

Abstract

Sociology always used to be described, unproblematically, as the science of society.1 Many sociologists have expressed self-doubts about the appropriateness of designating their discipline as a ‘science’, and increasing numbers have begun to express similar concerns about describing their subject matter as ‘society’. While disputes over the scientific character of sociological method have largely been resolved through the use of alternative words (such as discipline, study) or through circumlocution – simple avoidance of the disputed word – rejection of the word ‘society’ seems to point to something deeper, to issues that lie at the very heart of the discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Comte, A. (1848) A General View ofPositivism. Stephen Austin: Hertford

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1895) The Rules of the Sociological Method. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, J. and Scott, J. (2000) Social Structure. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2000)‘Postdisciplinary Studies: Sociology and the Curse of Disciplinary Parochialism and Imperialism’, in Eldridge, John E.T. and others (eds) For Sociology, Durham: Sociologypress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2005a) ‘Fallacies in the Critique of Disciplinary Sociology’, Sociological Research Online 10 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2005b) Sociology and Its Others: Reflections on Disciplinary

    Google Scholar 

  • Specialisation and Fragmentation’, Sociological Research Online 10(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2005c) ‘Some Principal Concerns in the Shaping of Sociology’, in Halsey, A.H. and Runciman, W.G. (eds) British Sociology, Seen from Within and Without, Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2007) ‘Sociology and the Social….’, 21st Century Society 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1908) Soziologie: Untersuchungen Über Die Formen Der Vergesselshaftung. Berlin: Düncker und Humblot, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (1981) ‘Sociology as a Parasite: Some Vices and Virtues’, in Abrams, P., Deem, R., Finch, J., and Rock, P. (eds) Practice and Progress: British Sociology, 1950–1980. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2000) Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2005) ‘Beyond the Science of Society’, Sociological Research Online 10 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (2003) ‘The Myth of the Nation State: Theorizing Society and Polities in a Global Era’, Sociology 37 (3): 531–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 John Scott

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scott, J. (2010). Sociology and the Sociological Imagination: Reflections on, Disciplinarity and Intellectual Specialisation. In: Burnett, J., Jeffers, S., Thomas, G. (eds) New Social Connections. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274877_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics