Skip to main content

Counting Nonmarket, Ecological Public Goods: The Elements of a Welfare-Significant Ecological Quantity Index

  • Chapter
Is Economic Growth Sustainable?

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

This chapter addresses a difficult, important, and long-standing problem in national income accounting: How do we capture the welfare contributions of nonmarket, public environmental goods?1 As I argue here, the key to this endeavor is the construction of a welfare-significant ecological quantity index (WSEQI). Quantity indexes and their price index counterparts are the core of any national income or product account (NIPA).

Stanford University and Resources for the Future (RFF).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ayres, R. and A. Kneese 1969. ‘Production, Consumption, and Externalities.’ American Economic Review LIX: 282–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf, S. and J. Boyd 2005. ‘The Architecture and Measurement of an Ecosystem Services Index.’ RFF Discussion Paper 05–22. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future (RFF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. 2006. ‘The Nonmarket Benefits of Nature: What Should Be Counted in Green GDP?’ Ecological Economics 61: 716–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. and S. Banzhaf 2007. ‘What Are Ecosystem Services?’ Ecological Economics 63 (2–3): 616–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binning, C., S. Cork, R. Parry, and D. Shelton 2001. Natural Assets: An Inventory of Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Goulburn Broken Catchment. Report of the Ecosystem Services Project. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Sustainable Ecosystems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C. 1975. ‘The History of the United States National Income and Product Accounts.’ Review of Income and Wealth 21: 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecological Economics 2006. ‘Special Issue: Environmental Benefits Transfer: Methods, Applications, and New Directions.’ Ecological Economics 60: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Sarafy, S. 1989. ‘The Proper Calculation of Income for Depletable Natural Resources.’ Pages 10–18 in Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development. Y.J. Ahmad, S. El Serafy, and E. Lutz. (eds), Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (ed.), 1992. Output Measurement in the Service Sectors. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. 2000. Nature and the Marketplace: Capturing the Value of Ecosystem Services. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. 2007. ‘Environmental Accounting for Ecosystems.’ Ecological Economics 61: 693–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. and B. Kristrom 2005. Chapter 22 in National Income and the Environment: Handbook of Environmental Economics. Vol. 3. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, J.E. 2000. Lessons Learned From Environmental Accounting: Findings from Nine Case Studies. Washington, DC: The World Conservation Union (IUCN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, J.E. 2005. National Environmental Accounting: Bridging the Gap between Ecology and Economy. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future (RFF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, R.J. and V.K. Smith (eds), 1993. Valuing Natural Assets. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future (RFF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C. 2005. ‘Managing Ecosystem Services: What Do We Need to Know about Their Ecology?’ Ecology Letters 8: 468–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäler, K.-G. 1991. ‘National Accounts and Environmental Resources.’ Environmental and Resource Economics 1 (1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W.D. and E.C. Kokkelenberg (eds), 1999. Nature’s Numbers: Expanding the National Economic Accounts to Include the Environment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peskin, H.M. 1989. ‘Accounting for Natural Resource Depletion in Developing Countries.’ Environmental Department Working Paper No. 13. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peskin, H.M. and M.S. Delos Angeles 2001. ‘Accounting for Environmental Services: Contrasting the SESA and the ENRAP Approaches.’ Review of Income and Wealth 47 (2): 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, R., W. Magrath, M. Wells, C. Beer, and F. Rossini 1989. Wasting Assets: Natural Resources in the National Income Accounts. New York: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoer, K. 2006. The German System of Environmental-Economic Accounting: Concept, Current State, and Application. Wiesbaden: German Federal Statistical Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. 2007. ‘Development of the SEAA 2003 and Its Implementation.’ Ecological Economics 61: 592–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. 2006. ‘Framework of Green National Accounting System in China.’ Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations 1984. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting: An Operational Manual. Series F, Vol. 78. New York: United Nations Statistics Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and The World Bank 2003. Handbook of National Accounting, Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. BEA (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis) 1982. Measuring Nonmarket Activity. U.S. BEA Working Paper No. 2. Washington, DC: U.S. BEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.-L. 2007. ‘Implementation of Land and Ecosystem Accounts at the European Environment Agency.’ Ecological Economics 61: 695–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boyd, J. (2010). Counting Nonmarket, Ecological Public Goods: The Elements of a Welfare-Significant Ecological Quantity Index. In: Heal, G. (eds) Is Economic Growth Sustainable?. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274280_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics