Skip to main content

The Building Block Approach to a Common European Model

  • Chapter
Financial Participation of Employees in the EU-27

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Transition ((SET))

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

In every political system based on a market economy, the concept of property, and especially the legal institution of private property, plays a determining role. However, privatisation, increasing concentration, unequal distribution and internationalisation of property have created economic, political and social problems, which so far have defied solution. The creation of a ‘New Social Europe’ and the recent inclusion of no less than ten Eastern European states make the property question even more urgent. Financial participation (in the form of employee ownership as well as profit-sharing) based on an appropriate legal framework addresses these problems at their source. Instead of eliminating private property and thereby destroying the market economy, wage-dependent employees can be enabled to acquire productive property as shareholders in successful business corporations.

If then, we regard economic freedom as a good, our objective must be thus to restore property. We must seek political and economic reforms which shall tend to distribute property more widely until the owners of sufficient means of production … are numerous enough to determine the character of society.

Hilaire Belloc, The Servile State, 1913

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See H. Roggemann (1999a) ‘Functional Change in Property Rights in the Welfare State: Lessons from the Federal Republic of Germany’, in I. Collier, H. Roggemann, O. Scholz and H. Toman (eds) Welfare States in Transition — East and West (New York: St. Martin’s Press), pp. 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See L. Kelso and P. H. Kelso (1991) Democracy and Economic Power: Extending the ESOP Revolution through Binary Economics (Lanham, MD: University Press of America).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See J. Lowitzsch (2002) Privatisierung und Beteiligung in Mittelosteuropa — Am Beispiel des polnischen, slowakischen und tschechischen Modells [Privatisation and Capital Participation in Central Eastern Europe — The Example of the Polish, the Czech and the Slovak Model] (Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See F. Barjak, G. Heimpold et al. (1996) Management-Buyout in Ostdeutschland, (Halle: Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a recent, comprehensive overview of the positive economic evidence (especially for ESOPs) see J. R. Blasi, D. Kruse and A. Bernstein (2003) In the Company of Owners (New York: Basic Books)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ’speaking one’s mind declines when property holding declines, and with it those who are free of necessity disappear from sight’, S. de Grazia (1962) Of Time, Work and Leisure (New York: The Twentieth Century Fund).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See H. Roggemann (1997a) Functional Changes of Property Rights in East and West — Comparative Remarks to Post-Socialist Transformation in Eastern and Western Europe, CERGE EI Working Paper (Prague: Charles University)

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Roggemann (1997b) ‘On the Relation between Ownership and Privatisation in the Post-Socialist Countries’ in University of Split, Faculty of Economics (ed.) Enterprise in Transition II (Split: Faculty of Economics, University of Split), p. 193

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Roggemann and J. Lowitzsch (eds) (2002) Privatisierungsins titutionen in Mittel-und Osteuropa (Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Pendleton, J. Blasi, D. Kruse et al. (2002) Theoretical Study on Stock Options in Small and Medium Enterprises, Study for the European Commission (Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University Business School)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Price Waterhouse Coopers (2002) Employee Stock Options in the EU and the USA (London: PriceWaterhouseCoopers).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Chang (1990) ‘Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Shareholder Wealth: An Empirical Investigation’, Financial Management, Spring, pp. 48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The percentage of a company’s free cash flow which will be required to service the repurchase liability on average over a period of years is fairly constant unless the multiple of the company’s earnings (price/earnings ratio) alters dramatically. The average company will require cash equivalent to 7.5 per cent of the value of the allocated stock in the trust for repurchase liability purposes each year. This is equivalent to a 7.5 per cent dividend on the stock, but only on the stock already allocated to employee accounts in the trust. See L. Lyon (1989) The Repurchase Liability or the Phantom ofthe ESOP (San Francisco, CA: Menke & Associates, Inc.), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See E. Poutsma and H. van den Tillaart (1996) Financiele werknemerspar-ticipatie in Nederland: tijd voor beleid! (The Hague: Nederlands Participatie Instituut).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Jens Lowitzsch

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lowitzsch, J. (2009). The Building Block Approach to a Common European Model. In: Financial Participation of Employees in the EU-27. Studies in Economic Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274167_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics