Skip to main content

Abstract

Strategic asset allocation is usually the single most important decision that determines the total return performance of a portfolio. This decision can be made using a plethora of distinct methodologies that are well known in the literature and among practitioners. The typical approach uses a standard Markowitz model or a similar one based on a double objective quadratic optimization. The optimal portfolio can be obtained by defining risk preferences with intended restrictions, asset return and risk expectations and investment time horizon. Sometimes, additional tools like stress testing are used to extend the restriction framework. However, only a small set of investor’s preferences can be represented with standard models. As preferences tend to be multiple and even conflicting, a more complex framework is necessary to reflect them properly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arditti, F.D. and Levy, H. (1975). ‘Portfolio Efficiency Analysis in Three Moments: The Multi-Period Case’. Journal of Finance, 30, 797–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. and Litterman, R. (2001). ‘Global Portfolio Optimization’. Financial Analysts Journal, Sept., 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, K.J. and Pogue, J.A. (1967). ‘An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Portfolio Selection Models’. Journal of Business, Apr., 166–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. (1976). ‘Multiperiod Consumption–Investment Decisions: A Correction’. American Economic Review, 66(4), 723–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. (1970). ‘Multiperiod Consumption–Investment Decisions’. American Economic Review, 60(1), 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, N.H. (1971). ‘Multi-period Mean–Variance Analysis: Toward a General Theory of Portfolio Choice’. Journal of Finance, 26, 857–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C.R., Liechty, J., Liechty, M.W. and Mueller, P. (2004). Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments. (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=634141).

    Google Scholar 

  • Konno, H. and Suzuki, K. (1995). ‘A Mean—Variance—Skewness Optimization Model’. Journal of Operations Research Society of Japan, 38, 137–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.K. and El-Sharkawi, M.A. (2008). Modern Heuristic Optimization Techniques. IEEE Wiley-InterScience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.M. and Gen, M. (2007). ‘An Effective Decision-Based Genetic Algorithm Approach to Multiobjective Portfolio Optimization Problem’. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 1(5), 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G.P., Yang, J.B. and Whidborne, J.F. (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization and Control. Research Studies Press, Baldock, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Longstaff, F.A. and Pan, J. (2003). ‘Dynamic Asset Allocation with Event Risk’. Journal of Finance, 58(1), 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M. (1952). ‘Portfolio Selection’. Journal of Finance, March, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M. (1959). ‘Portfolio Selection, Efficient Diversification of Investments’. Cowles Foundation Monograph, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martellini, L. and Urosevic, B. (2005). Static Mean—Variance Analysis with Uncertain Time Horizon. (http://www.edhec-risk.com).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud, R. (1998). Efficient Asset Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perold, A.F. (1984). ‘Large-scale Portfolio Optimization’. Management Science, 30(10), 1143–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1969). ‘Portfolio Selection by Dynamic Stochastic Programming’. Review of Economics and Statistics, 50, 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1970). ‘The Fundamental Approximation Theorem of Portfolio Analysis in Terms of Means, Variances and Higher Moments’. Review of Economic Studies, 37, 537–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.F. (1963). ‘A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis’. Management Science (9), 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, R. and Subrahmanyan, M. (1978). ‘A Multiperiod Equilibrium Asset-Pricing Model’. Econometrica, 46, Sept.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Cacella, P.M.F., Damaso, I.R., da Silva, A.F. (2010). A Strategic Asset Allocation Methodology Using Variable Time Horizon. In: Berkelaar, A.B., Coche, J., Nyholm, K. (eds) Interest Rate Models, Asset Allocation and Quantitative Techniques for Central Banks and Sovereign Wealth Funds. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230251298_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics