Abstract
Hysteresis has been introduced in economics as an alternative to the dominant mainstream models based on the various declensions of the Natural Rate of Unemployment and of the NAIRU. By contrast with the improper interpretations of the concept of hysteresis, many Post-Keynesians have tried to exploit the genuine hysteresis concept used in physics and in other sciences, in order to try understanding the persistence of high unemployment rates in Europe. Hysteresis is one of the most important forms of path dependency in economics. In the presence of hysteresis, the economic system will be characterised by changing equilibria in the aftermath of non-dominated aggregate shocks. In these conditions, the equilibrium unemployment rates change on the basis of the history of past non-dominated aggregate shocks. Rather surprisingly, the authors that have worked in this field up to now have forgotten to examine one of its most important implications: in the presence of hysteresis, unemployment is mainly an involuntary phenomenon. After summing up the main results of the debates on the meaning and the relevance of main definitions of hysteresis in the literature, and underlining the relevance of the concept of genuine hysteresis, we propose a theoretical model for understanding hysteresis in unemployment on the basis of Keynes’s concept of effective demand.
The author wishes to thank Mark Setterfield and all the other participants in the 5th International Conference on Developments in Economic Theory and Policy for their helpful and relevant remarks on a preliminary version of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alogoskoufis, G. and Manning, A. (1988) ‘Wage Setting and Unemployment Persistence in Europe, Japan and the USA’, European Economic Review, 32 (2-3), pp. 698–706.
Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F. and Topol, R. (1990) ‘Une tentative d’Elucidation d’un Concept Flou: l’hystérésis’, Actes du colloque annuel de l’AFSE, pp. 135–46.
Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F. and Topol, R. (1991)’ strong Hysteresis: An Application to Foreign Trade, Document de Travail de l’OFCE, 91(3).
Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F. and Topol, R. (1993) ‘Unit-Root in the Wage-Price Spiral is Not Hysteresis in Unemployment’, Journal of Economic Studies, 20 (1/2), pp. 123–36.
Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F. and Topol, R. (1994) Strong Hysteresis versus Zero-Root Dynamics, Economic Letters, 44, pp. 43–7.
Ball, L. and Mankiw, G. (2002) ‘The NAIRU in Theory and Practice’, NBER Working Paper, 8940, May.
Barro, R. and Gordon, R. (1983) ‘A positive theory of monetary policy in a natural rate model’, Journal of Political Economy, 91, pp. 589–610.
Blanchard, O.J. and Summers, L.H. (1986) ‘Hysteresis in Unemployment’, European Economic Review, Papers and Procedings, 31, pp. 288–95.
Blanchard, O.J. and Summers, L.H. (1988) ‘Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem’, in Summers, L.H. Understanding Unemployment, M.I.T. Press.
Booth, A., Chen, Y.F. and Zoega, G. (2002) ‘Hiring and firing: a tale of two thresholds’, Journal of Labour Economics, 9(20), pp. 217–48.
Cross, R. (1993a) ‘On the foundations of hysteresis in economic systems’, Economics and Philosophy, 9(1), pp. 53–74.
Cross, R. (1993b) ‘Hysteresis and Post Keynesian Economics’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 15(3), pp. 305–8.
Cross, R. (1995a) ‘Metaphors and time reversibility and irreversibility in economic systems’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 1, pp. 123–34.
Cross, R. (1995b) ‘Is the natural rate hypothesis consistent with hysteresis?’, in Cross, R. (1995) The Natural Rate of Unemployment: Reflections on 25 Years of the Hypothesis, Cambridge University Press.
Cross, R. (1996) ‘The Natural Rate: An Attractor for Actual Unemployment, or an Attractee?’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 43(3).
Cross, R., Darby, J., Ireland, J. and Piscitelli, L. (1998) ‘Hysteresis and unemployment: a preliminary investigation’, CEPR/ESRC Unemployment Dynamics Workshop Paper.
Cross, R. and Lang, D. (2004) ‘Habits, hysteresis and the law of one price: the case of E-commerce’, CEDERS Working Paper.
Cross, R. and Strachan, D. (2001) ‘Three Pillars of Conventional Wisdom, Review of Political Economy, 13(2), pp. 181–200.
Cross, R., Piscitelli, L., Grinfeld, M. and Lamba, H. (1998) ‘A test for strong hysteresis, Computational Economics, 15, pp. 59–78.
Dixit, A. (1989) ‘Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty’, Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), pp. 620–38.
Dixit, A. and Pindyck, R. (1994) Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press.
Estrella, A., Mishkin, F.S. (1998) ‘Rethinking the Role of NAIRU in Monetary Policy: Implications of Model Formulation and Uncertainty’, NBER Working Paper, 6518, April.
Ewing, J.A. (1881) ‘On the Production of Transient Electric Currents in Iron and Steel Conductors by Twisting them when Magnetised or by Magnetising them when Twisted’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 33, pp. 21–3.
Fève, P., Henin, P.Y. and Jolivaldt, P. (2003) ‘Testing for Hysteresis: Unemployment Persistence and Wage Adjustment’, Empirical Economics, 28(3), pp. 535–52.
Friedman, M. (1968) ‘The Role of Monetary Policy’, American Economic Review, 13(1).
Göcke, M. (2003) ‘Various Concepts of Hysteresis Applied in Economics’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 2(16), pp. 167–88.
Gordon, R. (1997) ‘The time-varying NAIRU and its implications for economic policy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), pp. 11–32.
Hallet, A.J.H. and Piscitelli, L. (2002) ‘Testing for hysteresis against nonlinear alternatives’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27, pp. 303–27.
Hein, E. and Vogel, L. (2008) ‘Distribution and Growth Reconsidered: Empirical Results for Six OECD Countries’, Journal of Economics, 32(3), pp. 479–511.
Jackman, R. and Leroy, M. (1995) ‘Estimating the NAIRU: The Case of France’, Actes du Congrès Annuel de l’AFSE, September, Paris.
Jevons, W.S. (1905) Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan.
Katzner, D.W. (1993) ‘Some Notes on the Role of History and the Definition of Hysteresis and Related Concepts in Economic Analysis’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 15(3), pp. 323–45.
Katzner, D.W. (1999) ‘Hysteresis and the Modelling of Economic Phenomena’, Review of Political Economy, 11(2), pp. 171–81.
Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan Press, 1973.
Krasnolsel’skii, M.A. and Pokrovskii, A.W. (1989) Systems with Hysteresis, Springer Verlag.
Kydland, F. and Prescott, E. (1977) ‘Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans’, Journal of Political Economy, 85, pp. 473–91.
Lang, D. (2004) Hysteresis in Unemployment, (PhD. Thesis), Université de la Méditerranée.
Lang, D. (2008) ‘Why economists should choose their inheritance: the example of physics and path-independence in economic systems’, Review of Political Economy, July.
Lang, D. and De Peretti, C. (2009) ‘A Strong Hysteresis Model for Okun’s Law: Theory and Preliminary Investigation’, International Review of Applied Economics, forthcoming.
Lardic, S. (1998) L’hystérèse en Economie, Théorie et Mesure, PhD. Thesis, Université de ParisX — Nanterre.
Layard, R., Nickell, S. and Jackman, R. (1991) Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market, Oxford University Press.
Mayergoyz, I.D. (1991) Mathematical Models of Hysteresis, Springer Verlag.
Mirowski, P. (1989) More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics, Cambridge University Press.
Roed, K. (1997) ‘Hysteresis in Unemployment’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 11(4), pp. 339–418.
Sawyer, M. (1997) ‘The NAIRU: A Critical Appraisal’, International Papers in Political Economy, 6(2), pp. 1–40. Reprinted in P. Arestis and M. Sawyer (eds) Money, Finance and Capitalist Development, Edward Elgar, pp. 220–54.
Setterfield, M. (1993) ‘Towards a Long-run Theory of Effective Demand’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, spring, 22(2), pp. 331–56.
Setterfield, M. (1997) Rapid Growth and Relative Decline: Modelling Macroeconomic Dynamics with Hysteresis, Macmillan.
Staiger, D., Stock, J.H. and Watson, M. (1997) ‘The NAIRU, Unemployment and monetary policy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, pp. 33–49.
Stanley, T.D. (2004) ‘Does Unemployment Hysteresis Falsify the Natural Rate Hypothesis? A Meta-Regression Analysis’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 18(4), pp. 589–612.
Thomson, W. and Tait, P.G. (1867) A Treatise on Natural Philosophy, Cambridge.
Tobin, J. (1995) ‘The Natural Rate as New Classical Macroeconomics’, in Cross, R. (1995) The Natural Rate of Unemployment: Reflections on 25 Years of the Hypothesis, Cambridge University Press.
Walras, L. (1909) ‘Economique et mécanique’, Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise de Sciences Naturelles, 45, pp. 313–25.
Walras, L. (1954) Elements of Pure Economics, Allen & Unwin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Dany Lang
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lang, D. (2009). Involuntary Unemployment in a Path-Dependent System: The Case of Strong Hysteresis. In: Arestis, P., Sawyer, M. (eds) Path Dependency and Macroeconomics. International Papers in Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230251090_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230251090_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31417-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-25109-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)