Abstract
In his influential Nationalism (1960) Elie Kedourie casts Kant as the philosopher of nineteenth-century nationalism; in his equally influential Nations and Nationalism (1983), Ernest Gellner casts him, by contrast, as an eighteenth-century internationalist.1 This divergence provides a useful frame for thinking about the relationship between nationalism and cosmopolitanism at a crucial historical moment in modern European history. For both Kedourie and Gellner, Kant functions as a sort of shorthand for a number of ideas associated with eighteenth-century cosmopolitanism, but the role he plays in each in relation to nationalism points to the instability of the idea of cosmopolitanism itself. Considered alternately as representative of Enlightenment cosmopolitanism and as precursor to Romantic nationalism, Kant’s political philosophy has remained pivotal in recent attempts to theorize the nation: not only does he summarize much of eighteenth-century debate about cosmopolitanism in his work but his political thought also combines the cosmopolitan and the national to create a non-unified model of nation confounding those critical formulations that map the relationship between cosmopolitanism and nationalism in strictly oppositional terms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Hannah Arendt was instrumental in initiating the current interest in Kant’s political philosophy. Her influential Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1982) argued persuasively that Kant’s political philosophy formed a neglected fourth critique. Among the numerous recent studies of Kant’s political philosophy, see for example Kimberly Hutchings’ Kant, Critique and Politics (London: Routledge, 1996)
Hans Reiss’ ‘Introduction’ to Kant: Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)
Patrick Riley’s Kant’s Political Philosophy (Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield, 1983).
Elie Kedourie, Nationalism, revised ed. (London: Hutchinson, 1985), 9.
Ernest Gellner, Nations and Nationalism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983), 1.
Andrew Hurrell, ‘Kant and the Kantian Paradigm in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 16 (July 1990), 204.
Thomas Schlereth, The Cosmopolitan in Enlightenment Thought: Its Form and Function in the Ideas of Franklin, Hume, and Voltaire, 1694–1790 (Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977), xii.
Julia Kristeva, Nations without Nationalism, Leon S. Roudiez, trans. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 16.
Giuseppe Micheli and René Wellek, Kant’s Thought in Britain: The Early Impact (London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press, 1993).
Séamus Deane observes that long after Burke’s conspiracy theory was discredited, the English government ‘was willing to nurture this notion because it kept anti-French feeling alive and because it was a useful weapon in its own battle against Jacobins in England, Scotland, and Ireland’. See Séamus Deane, The French Revolution and Enlightenment in England, 1789–1832 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988), 170.
David Simpson, Romanticism, Nationalism, and the Revolt against Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), 178.
Abbé Barruel, Memoirs, Illustrating the History of Jacobinism, Hon. Robert Clifford, trans., 4 vols (London: T. Burton and Co., 1797), 1: ix. Barruel’s translator, Robert Clifford, works with the same basic premises in his Application of Barruel’s Memoirs of Jacobinism, to the Secret Societies of Ireland and Great Britain (London: E. Booker, 1798).
James Mackintosh, Vindiciae Gallicae. A defence of the French Revolution and its English Admirers, against the accusations of the Right Hon. Edmund Burke, in The Miscellaneous Works of the Right Honourable Sir James Mackintosh (Boston: Phillips, Sampson and Co., 1858), 426. Mackintosh compares Burke’s treatment of the French monied class in Reflections to Tory treatment of the Whigs during the Glorious Revolution
Copyright information
© 2009 Esther Wohlgemut
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wohlgemut, E. (2009). A Cosmopolitan Nation?: Kant, Burke and the Question of Borders. In: Romantic Cosmopolitanism. Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250994_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250994_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31247-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-25099-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)