Abstract
The role of the public modernizer and the project of piecemeal social reformism became redundant in the situation of “permanent revolution.” With the constant radicalization of the regime and the masses such attempts inevitably come to be seen as “conservative” vis-à-vis the revolutionary agenda. The corporation of agricultural specialists structured by the ethos of piecemeal reformism of the peasant economy and by high social demand for their services as expressed through the booming job market found themselves in a social and ideological void. The editorial opening in the very first issue of the leading Messenger of Agriculture in 1918 expressed the utter frustration of countryside modernizers, acknowledging the return to “ground zero” of the post-1905 Bezvremenie (literally: an epoch “out of time”) period, only without any positive program of action or hope:
We came into the new year along the path of such a bezvremenie that one cannot even think about any logically substantiated program whatsoever.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ia. Binman, and S. Kheinman, Kadry gosudarstvennogo i kooperativnogo apparata SSSR (Moscow: Gosplan SSSR. Gos. Planovo-khoziaistvennoe izdatel’stvo, 1930), pp. 124–25
Copyright information
© 2009 Ilya V. Gerasimov
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gerasimov, I.V. (2009). The Dissolution of the “Imagined Community”: Nationalization as Expropriation. In: Modernism and Public Reform in Late Imperial Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250901_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250901_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31088-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-25090-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)