Abstract
In letters written just after the publication of her remarkable “novel-poem” Aurora Leigh (1856), Elizabeth Barrett Browning tracked what these days we would call the poem’s buzz. The letters reflect her excitement and apparent mystification about the poem’s reception. In a letter to her sister Arabella dated 10–18 December 1856, she wrote that the poem is “taken up with favour with certain persons, to the amount of a mania;” in a letter to Anna Jameson dated 2 February 1857, she reported on the “extravagant” fan mail she received, and jokingly marveled at the spectacle of “quite decent women taking the part of the book in a sort of effervescence which I hear of with astonishment.”1 Some of these women indeed wrote directly to Barrett Browning to thank her for “‘help’—for new views of ‘love, truth, and purity,’” as she informed Julia Martin in a letter dated 10 March 1857.2 Influential readers were vocal in their enthusiasm: John Ruskin wrote to Robert Browning assuring him “all the best people shout with me, rapturously” in praise of the poem.3 While reviews in the major periodicals were mixed, the passionate response the poem aroused in many individual readers is striking—as is Barrett Browning’s surprised, delighted and sometimes bemused fascination with the “extravagances” of her readers.4
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
To Arabella Barrett, in Letters of Elizabeth Barrett Browning to Her Sister Arabella, ed. Scott Lewis (Waco, TX: Wedgestone Press, 2001), II, 272–7
Quoted in Dorothy Mermin, Elizabeth Barrett Browning: The Origins of a New Poetry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), p. 220.
Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Women of Letters: Selected Letters of Elizabeth Barrett Browning and Mary Russell Mitford, ed. Meredith B. Raymond and Mary Rose Sullivan (Boston: Twayne, 1987), II, 460.
I borrow the language of enchantment from Emily Dickinson’s writing about the experience of reading Barrett Browning; see the t houghtful essay by Ann Swyderski, “Dickinson’s Enchantment: The Barrett Browning Fascicles.” Symbiosis 7: 1 (April 2003) 76–98.
See Marjorie Stone, “Genre Subversion and Gender Inversion: The Princess and Aurora Leigh,” Victorian Poetry 25: 2 (1987) 101–27.
Naomi Schor, George Sand and Idealism (New York: Columbia UP, 1993).
Cora Kaplan, Introduction to Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Aurora Leigh and Other Poems (London: Women’s Press, 1978), p. 25
Deirdre David, Intellectual Women and Victorian Patriarchy: Harriet Martineau, Elizabeth Barrett Browning, George Eliot (London: Macmillan, 1987), p. 115.
Marc Redfield, Phantom Formations: Aesthetic Ideology and the Bildungsroman (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1996).
Kate Field, “Elizabeth Barrett Browning,” Atlantic Monthly 8 (September 1861) 368–76
William Stigand, “The Works of Elizabeth Barrett Browning” Edinburgh Review 114 (1861) 513–34
Copyright information
© 2009 Eric Eisner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eisner, E. (2009). Elizabeth Barrett Browning and the Energies of Fandom. In: Nineteenth-Century Poetry and Literary Celebrity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250840_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250840_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31001-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-25084-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)