Abstract
This Country Study critically examines fiscal policies in Zambia, particularly the effect of recent and projected debt relief on ‘fiscal space’. The study finds that due to associated policy conditionalities and other factors, Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) debt relief will result in less fiscal space, rather than more. And projected G-8 debt relief will only marginally expand fiscal space. Part of the problem is that the Zambian government has little leeway to choose its own fiscal policies, despite donor rhetoric about ‘national ownership’ of poverty-reduction policies. Drawing on the analysis of a national study, the Country Study also estimates the additional public expenditures that would enable Zambia to reach the MDGs. In order to finance these expenditures, it proposes a diversified strategy of increasing tax revenue, expanding the fiscal deficit and obtaining more Official Development Assistance (ODA). Finally, it recommends core elements of an expansionary macro framework that could support a 7 per cent rate of economic growth (needed to attain MDG #1, i.e., halving extreme income poverty) and buttress the government’s effort to reach the other MDGs. In the process, it seeks to dispel common fears about the possible adverse effects of such fiscal expansion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adam, Christopher S. and David L. Bevan (2005). ‘Fiscal Deficits and Growth in Developing Countries,’ Journal of Public Economics, 89 (4) 571–597.
Dagdeviren, Hulya, Rolph van der Hoeven and John Weeks (2002). ‘Poverty Reduction with Growth and Redistribution,’ Development and Change, 33 (3), 383–413.
IMF (2004a). Monetary Policy Implementation at Different Stages of Market Development: Country Cases and Appendices – Supplementary Information. IMF website.
IMF (2004b). Zambia: Selected Issues and Statistical Appendix. IMF Country Report No. 04/160, IMF website.
IMF (2004c). Zambia, Joint Staff Assessment of PRSP Progress Report. IMF Country Report No. 04/179: Washington, D.C.: IMF.
IMF (2005a). Zambia: Enhanced Initiative for Heavily Indebted Poor Countries – Completion Point Document. IMF Country Report No. 05/137, IMF website.
IMF (2005b). Zambia: Second Review under the Three-Year Arrangement under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility and Request for Waiver and Modification of Performance Criteria, and Financing Assurances Review – Staff Report; Staff Statement; Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Zambia. IMF Country Report No. 05/138, IMF website.
Kakwani, Nanak and Hyun H. Son (2006). ‘How Costly Is It to Achieve the Millennium Development Goal of Halving Poverty between 1990 and 2015,’ Working Paper #19, May, International Poverty Centre, Brasilia.
Khan, Mohsin S. and Abdelhak S. Senhadji (2001). ‘Threshold Effects in the Relationship between Inflation and Growth,’ IMF Staff Papers #48, Washington, D.C: IMF.
Klugman, Jeni (2002). A Sourcebook for Poverty Reduction Strategies (two-volume set), Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
McKinley, Terry (2005). ‘Why Is the Dutch Disease Always a Disease?’ Working Paper #10 of the International Poverty Centre, November, Brasilia.
Ministry of Finance and National Planning (2005). Macroeconomic Indicators (1997–2005). Lusaka: Government of Zambia.
Ministry of Finance and National Planning (MFND) (2006). National Development Plan, Chapter 52 (draft). Lusaka: Government of Zambia.
Mphuka, C. (2005). The Cost of Meeting the MDGs in Zambia. Lusaka: CSPR & CCJDP.
Situmbeko, L.C. and J.J. Zulu (2004). Zambia Condemned to Debt: How the IMF and the World Bank Have Undermined Development. London: World Development Movement.
United Nations Development Programme, UNDP (2005). Millennium Development Goals, Zambia, Status Report 2005. Lusaka: UNDP.
Weeks, John (2006). ‘Conditionality, Development Assistance and Poverty: Reforming the PRS Process,’ in Alberto Paloni and Maurizio Zanardi (eds), The IMF, World Bank and Policy Reform, Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Weeks, John, Victoria Chisala, Alemayehu Geda, Hulya Dagdeviren, Terry McKinley, Alfredo Saad-Filho and Carlos Oya (2006). Economic Policies for Growth, Employment and Poverty Reduction: Case Study of Zambia. Supported by the Poverty Group and the International Poverty Centre of UNDP, Brasilia: UNDP.
World Bank (2002). Zambia: Country Assistance Evaluation, Report No. 25075, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Operations Evaluation Department.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 United Nations Development Programme
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weeks, J., McKinley, T. (2009). Does Debt Relief Increase Fiscal Space in Zambia? The MDG Implications. In: McKinley, T. (eds) Economic Alternatives for Growth, Employment and Poverty Reduction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250635_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250635_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30643-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-25063-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)