Abstract
Abstract
The recent managerial literature on the development of corporate infrastructures to deliver sophisticated and flexible IT capabilities is based on a set of assumptions concerning the role of management in strategy formulation, planning and control; the role of IT as a tool; the linkages between infrastructure and business processes; the implementation process.
This paper deconstructs such assumptions by gradually enriching the conventional management agenda with new priorities stemming from other styles of taking care of infrastructures. A first, enlarged agenda stems from the economics of national infrastructures. Managing such infrastructures consists of enacting tactics of interference with an almost autonomous ‘installed base’; aligning multiple stakeholders; fighting battles of standards; coping with irreversibility of investment decisions. Thus, economics shows that the scope for managerial control is severely limited. Various streams of social studies of technology provide an even more challenging agenda in which the infrastructure itself is an actor or an intermediate actant involved into complex games of reciprocal inscription and translations of stakeholders’ interests.
The original, straightforward management agenda appears, then, to be lacking: its foundations are irremediably shaken. The paper finally evokes a philosophybased agenda, the only one valuable in the uncharted territory where the usual foundations do not deliver any longer. Such an agenda speaks a language of weak agency: releasement; dwelling with mystery; capacity to drop the tools; valuing marginal practices. Will the last agenda play a key role in coping with the information infrastructures of the next millennium?
Actually, Gestell concerns us very directly. Gestell is … more extant (seiender) than all the atomic energy, all the machines, more extant than the impact of organization, information and automation.
(Heidegger, Identitaet und Differenz, 1957)
This chapter originally appeared in (1998) Information Technology and People 11(4) 305–327.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects, in W.E. Bijker, and J. Law (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 205 –224.
Akrich, M. and Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies, in W.E. Bijker, and J. Law (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 259–264.
Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1996). Organizational Learning II, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Arthur, B. (1988). Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics, in P.W. Anderson et al. (eds), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, New York: Perseus Press.
Arthur, B. (1996). Increasing returns and the two worlds of business, Harvard Business Review, July–August.
Berg, M. (1997). On forms, containers, and the electronic medical record: some tools for a sociology of the formal, Science, Technology and Human Values 22(4): 403–431.
Bowker, G. and Star, S.L. (1994). Knowledge and infrastructure in international information management. Problems of classification and coding, in L. Bud-Frierman, (ed.) Information Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business, New York: Routledge, pp. 187–213.
Braa, K., and T. Sandahl. (1998). Documents in infrastructures:challenges for design, in W.R.J. Baets (ed.) Proceedings from 6th European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1025–1040. Euro-Arab Management School, Granada, Spain, pp. 1025–1040.
Broadbent, M. and Weill, P. (1997). Management by maxim: how business and IT managers can create IT infrastructures, Sloan Management Review, Spring.
Broadbent, M., Weill, P. and St. Clair, D. (1995). The role of IT infrastructure in business process redesign, CISR WP278, Sloan School of Management, May.
Broadbent, M., Weill, P., O’Brien, T. and Neo, B.S. (1996). Firm context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability, International Conference on Information Systems Proceedings, Cleveland, OH.
Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis, in W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes and T. Pinch, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 83–106
Callon, M. (1991). Techno–economic networks and irreversibility, in J. Law (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, New York: Routledge, pp. 132–161.
Callon, M. (1994). Is science a public good? Science, Technology & Human Values 19(4): 395–424.
Ciborra, C.U. (1994). From thinking to tinkering, in C.U. Ciborra and T. Jelassi (eds), Strategic Information Systems, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Ciborra, C.U. (1996). Introduction: what does groupware mean for the organizations hosting it?, in C. Ciborra (ed.) Groupware & Teamwork: Invisible Aid or Technical Hindrance? Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Ciborra, C.U. and Lanzara, G.F. (1994). Formative contexts and information technology, Journal of Accounting, Management and Information technology 4(2): 61–86.
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics 3(1): 1–44.
Cordella, A. and Simon, K. (1997). Decreasing returns to infrastructure, IRIS Proceedings, Oslo.
Dahlbom, B. and Janlert, S. (1996). Computer Future, University of Goteborg.
David, P.A. (1987). Some new standards for the economics in the information age, in P. Dasgupta and P. Stoneman (eds), Economic policy and technological performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–239.
David, P.A. and Bunn, J.A. (1988). The economics of gateways technologies, Information Economics and Policy 3(2): 165–202.
H. Dreyfus, H.L. (1982). What Computers Can’t Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence, New York: Harper and Row.
Dreyfus, H.L. (1993). Heidegger in the connection between nihilm, art, technology and politics, in C. Guignon (ed.), Heidegger, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duncan, N.B. (1995). Capturing flexibility of IT infrastructure, Journal of Management information Systems 12(2): 37–57.
Ehn, P. (1989). Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts, Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.
Grindley, P. (1995). Standards, Strategy and Policy Costs, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hanseth, O. (1996). Information Technology as Infrastructure, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Gøteborg.
Hanseth, O. and Monteiro, E. (1997). Inscribing behavior in information infrastructure standards, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 7(4): 183–211.
Hanseth, O. and Monteiro. E. (1998). Changing irreversible networks, in W.R.J. Baets (ed.), Proceedings from 6th European Conference on Information Systems, Euro-Arab Management School, Granada, Spain, pp. 1123–1139.
Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E. and Hatling, M. (1996). Developing information infrastructure standards: the tension between standardisation and flexibility, Science Technology and Human Values 21(4): 407–426.
Heidegger, M. (1957). Identitaet und Differenz, Stuttgart: Neske.
Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und Zeit, Frankfurt: Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (1978). Basic Writings, London: Routledge.
Heidegger, M. (1992). Gelassenheit, Stuttgart: Neske.
Heidegger, M. (1994). Bremer und Freiburger Fortraege (1949), Frankfurt: Klostermann.
Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N. and Oldach, S. (1996). Aligning Business and IT strategies, in J. Luftman (ed.), Strategic Alignment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hughes, T.P. (1983). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Hughes, T.P. (1987). The evolution of large technical systems, in W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 51–82.
Hughes, T.P. (1994). Technological Momentum, in M. R. Smith and L. Marx (eds), Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 101–114.
Introna, L. (1997). Information, Management and Power, London: Macmillan.
Kallinikos, J. (1995). The architecture of the invisible: Technology as representation, Organization 2(1): 117–140.
Katz, M. and Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities, Journal of Political Economy 94(4): 822–841.
Keen, P.W. (1991). Shaping the Future, Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable, in J. Law (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, New York: Routledge, pp. 103–131.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Luftman, J. (ed.) (1996). Strategic Alignment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Monteiro, E. and Hanseth, O. (1995). Social shaping of information infrastructure: on being specific about the technology, in W. Orlikowski, G. Wilsham, M.R. Jones and J.I. DeGross (eds), Information Technology and Changes in Organisational Work, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 325–343.
Rosenberg, N. (1994). Explaining the Black Box, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Star, S.L. and Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces, Information Systems Research 7(1): 111–134.
Timmermans, S. and Berg, M. (1997). Standardization in action: achieving universalism and localization in medical protocols, Social Studies of Science 27: 273–305.
Unger, R.M. (1987). False Necessity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weill, P., Broadbent, M. and St. Clair, D. (1996). IT value and the role of IT infrastructure, in J. Luftman (ed.), Strategic Alignment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1987). Understanding Computers and Cognition, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Copyright information
© 2009 Claudio U. Ciborra and Ole Hanseth
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ciborra, C.U., Hanseth, O. (2009). From Tool to Gestell: Agendas for Managing the Information Infrastructure. In: Bricolage, Care and Information. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250611_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250611_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30620-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-25061-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)