Skip to main content

Unlocking the Trade Potential in Least-Developed Countries: A CGE Investigation for Bangladesh

  • Chapter
Book cover From Growth to Convergence
  • 109 Accesses

Abstract

During the past four decades, the region of developing Asia has significantly increased its trade with the rest of the world and within itself. This trend was led by the newly industrialized economies (NIEs)—Hong Kong, China; Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea); Singapore; and Taipei, China—and Southeast Asian countries in the 1960s and 1970s. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) caught up with them in the 1980s and 1990s. More recently, India and Viet Nam have also seen their trade shares rising. The overall share of developing Asia in world trade rose from 4.1% in 1965 to 16.6% in 2005. The region’s dependence on trade, measured by the sum of exports and imports as a share of gross domestic product (GDP), increased from 11.6% to 83.1% over the same period. This expansion of international trade in developing Asia has been accompanied by rapid economic growth and substantial poverty reduction. Despite the controversial results from the trade and growth literature,’ the growth story of developing Asia in the past few decades clearly demonstrates the vital role of trade in development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmed, Sadiq and Zaidi Sattar. 2004. Trade Liberalization, Growth and Poverty Reduction: The Case of Bangladesh. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James E. and Eric van Wincoop. 2004. “Trade Costs.” Journal of Economic Literature 42:691–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armington, Paul S. 1969. “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” IMF Staff Papers 16(1):159–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, Andrew, Jonathan Eaton, J. Bradford Jensen, and Samuel Kortum. 2003. “Plants and Productivity in International Trade.” American Economic Review 93(4):1268–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De, Prabir. 2006. “Empirical Estimates of Trade Costs for Asia.” Paper presented at LAEBA 2006 Third Annual Conference on Regional Integration and Regional Cooperation in Asia and Latin America: The Role of Regional Infrastructure, Seoul, 16–17 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, David. 1992. “Outward-oriented developing countries really grow more rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs 1876–1985.” Economic Development and Culture Change 40(3):523–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, David and Aart Kraay. 2003. “Institutions, Trade, and Growth: Revisiting the Evidence.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3004, Washington, DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, Jonathan, Samuel Kortum, and Francis Kramarz. 2004. “Dissecting Trade: Firms, Industries, and Export Destinations.” American Economic Review 94(2):150–4. May.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Sebastian. 1998. “Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know?” Economic Journal 108(447):383–98, March.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, Jeffrey and David Romer. 1999. “Does Trade Cause Growth?” American Economic Review 89(3):379–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, Thomas W. (ed.). 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, David and Peter J. Klenow. 2005. “The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Exports.” American Economic Review 95(3):704–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. 2005. “Bangladesh: Statistical Appendix.” IMF Country Report 05/243, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, Timothy J. 2005. “An Evaluation of the Performance of Applied General Equilibrium Models on the Impact of NAFTA.” In Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling: In Honor of Herbert Scarf. Edited by T.J. Kehoe, T.N. Srinivasan, and J. Whalley, pp. 341–77. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, Timothy J. and Kim J. Ruhl. 2003. “How Important Is the New Goods Margin in International Trade?” Staff Report 324, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 1979. “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 9(4):469–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levchenko, Andrei A. 2004. “Institutional Quality and International Trade.” Review of Economic Studies, 74(3):791–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limão, Nuno and Anthony J. Venables. 2001. “Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade.” World Bank Economic Review 15(3):451–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, Marc J. 2003. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mlachila, Montfort, and Yongzheng Yang. 2004. “The End of Textiles Quotas: A Case Study of the Impact on Bangladesh.” IMF Working Paper 04/108, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, Francisco and Dani Rodrik. 2001. “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to the Cross-national Evidence.” In B. Bernanke and K.S. Rogoff (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, 261–324. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Jeffrey D. and Andrew M. Warner. 1995. “Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1:1–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoven John B. and John Whalley. 1992. Applying General Equilibrium. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2001. “Duty and Quota Free Market Access for LDCs: An Analysis of Quad Initiatives.” UNCTAD and Commonwealth Secretariat, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique. 2005. “LINKAGE Technical Reference Document.” Development Prospects Group, World Bank. Processed.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2004. Trade Policies in South Asia: An Overview. Report 29949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeaple, Stephen Ross. 2005. “A Simple Model of Firm Heterogeneity, International Trade, and Wages.” Journal of International Economics 65(1):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, Fan. 2007. “Armington Meets Melitz: : Introducing Firm Heterogeneity in a Global CGE Model of Trade.” Paper presented in the Tenth Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, 7–10 June, Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Asian Development Bank

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhai, F. (2009). Unlocking the Trade Potential in Least-Developed Countries: A CGE Investigation for Bangladesh. In: Zhai, F. (eds) From Growth to Convergence. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250604_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics