Advertisement

Why are Bilateral Trade Agreements so Popular, and Does it Matter?

  • Jayant Menon

Abstract

On 15 August 2004, Mongolia signed a trade and investment framework agreement (TIFA) with the United States (US), a precursor to a bilateral trade agreement (BTA). Prior to this, Mongolia was the only country that had not signed either a TIFA or a BTA with another country, or had not joined a regional or plurilateral trade agreement (PTA). Every other country in the world today is a member of at least one BTA, and most are members of multiple BTAs.1 If PTAs were considered the main threat to the world trade system in the 1990s, the concern has since shifted toward BTAs. BTAs have been proliferating at an astounding pace recently.

Keywords

European Union Fair Trade World Trade Organization Free Trade Agreement North American Free Trade Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin, Richard E. 1996. “A Domino Theory of Regionalism.” In Richard E. Baldwin, P. Haaparanta, and J. Kiander (eds.), Expanding Membership of the EU. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. —. 2006a. “Managing the Noodle Bowl: The Fragility of East Asian Regionalism.” CEPR Discussion Paper 5561. London: CEPR.Google Scholar
  3. —. 2006b. “Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade.” World Economy 29(11):1451–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhagwati, Jagdish N. 2003. “The Singapore and Chile Free Trade Agreements.” Testimony before US House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services, 1 April.Google Scholar
  5. —. 2005. “From Seattle to Hong Kong.” Foreign Affairs 84/7, (WTO Special Edition). December.Google Scholar
  6. —. 2006. “Why Asia Must Opt for Open Regionalism on Trade.” The Financial Times. 3 November.Google Scholar
  7. Brittan, S. 2005. “Free Trade versus ‘Fair Trade’.” Remarks at a Foreign Policy Centre meeting with Hilary Benn, 10 January 2005. Available: http://wwwsamuelbrittan.co.uk/spee39_p.html.Google Scholar
  8. Dent, Christopher. 2006. New Free Trade Agreements in the Asia Pacific. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feridhanusetyawan, Tubagus. 2005. “Preferential Trading Agreements in the Asia-Pacific Region.” IMF Working Paper 149. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. FTA Watch 2006. “Overview of Bilateral Free Trade and Investment Agreements.” Background paper prepared for the Fighting FTAs workshop, Bangkok, 27–29 July.Google Scholar
  11. Grether, Jean-Marie and Marcelo Olarreaga. 1998. “Preferential and Non-preferential Trade Flows in World Trade,.” Staff Working Paper ERAD-98–10. WTO, Geneva.Google Scholar
  12. Lloyd, Peter. 2002. New Regionalism and New Bilateralism in the Asia-Pacific. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Looney, Robert E. 2005. “US Middle East Economic Policy: The Use of Free Trade Areas in the War on Terrorism.” Mediterranean Quarterly 16(3):102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Menon, Jayant. 1996. Adjusting towards AFTA: The Dynamics of Trade in ASEAN. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  15. —. 1998. “The Expansion of the ASEAN Free Trade Area.” Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 12(2):10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. —. 2005. “Building Blocks or Stumbling Blocks: Regional Cooperation Arrangements in Southeast Asia.” Discussion Paper 41. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  17. Min Gyo Koo. 2006. “From Multilateralism to Bilateralism. A Shift in South Korea’s Trade Strategy?” In Vinod K. Agrawal and Shujiro Urata (eds.), Bilateral Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific. London: Routledge, 140–59.Google Scholar
  18. Panagariya, A. 1999. “The Regionalism Debate: An Overview.” World Economy 22:477–511.Google Scholar
  19. Ravenhill, John 2006. “The Political Economy of the New Asia-Pacific Bilateralism: Benign, Banal, or Simply Bad?” In Vinod K. Agrawal and Shujiro Urata (eds.), Bilateral Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific. London: Routledge, 27–49.Google Scholar
  20. Scollay, R. and J. P. Gilbert. 2001. “New Regional Trading Arrangements in the Asia Pacific?” Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Tonelson, Alan. 2002. “There’s Only So Much That Foreign Trade Can Do.” Washington Post. 2 June.Google Scholar
  22. Tumbarello, Patrizia. 2005. “Regional Trade Integration and WTO Accession: Which Is the Right Sequencing? An Application to the CIS.” IMF Working Paper WP/05/94. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Reference to Commentary

  1. World Bank. 2005. Global Economic Prospects: Trade, Regionalism and Development. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Asian Development Bank 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jayant Menon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations