Skip to main content

Lifelong Employment, Labor Law and the Lost Decade: The End of a Job for Life in Japan?

  • Chapter
Innovation and Change in Japanese Management
  • 222 Accesses

Abstract

The 1990s were a ‘lost decade’ for the Japanese economy. The asset price bubble burst in the early 1990s. Collapsing land prices caused a spike in the number of non-performing secured loans. The financial sector was beset by high-profile collapses and consolidations. The ensuing corporate credit crunch sapped business investment and confidence. Insolvencies reached record levels. Unemployment soared (Citrin and Wolfson, 2006; Cook and McKay, 2006). Having lost its edge as one of the world’s most dynamic economies, Japan also waned in global influence. After being admired for its economic success in the 1970s (‘Japan-admiring’) and then criticized for the structural barriers to trade in the 1980s (‘Japan-bashing’), a new phenomena emerged in the 1990s: ‘Japan-passing’ (Drysdale, 2004; Stockwin, 2003). Japan was largely forgotten as world leaders, policy-makers and academics rushed to engage with the emerging economic powerhouses of China and India. In the 1990s, Japan was not just ‘lost’; it was slipping into irrelevance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • M. Abe, ‘Corporate Governance Structure and Employment Adjustment in Japan: An Empirical Analysis Using Corporate Finance Data’, Industrial Relations, 41(4) (2002), pp. 683–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Abe and T. Hoshi, ‘Corporate Finance and Human Resource Management in Japan’, in M. Aoki, G. Jackson and H. Miyajima (eds.), Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 227–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Abe and S. Shimizutani, ‘Employment Policy and Corporate Governance–An Empirical Comparison of the Stakeholder and the Profit-maximization Model’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 35 (2007), pp. 346–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.L. Ahmadjian and P. Robinson, ‘Safety in Numbers: Downsizing and the Deinstitutionalization of Permanent Employment in Japan’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (2001), pp. 622–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Amable, ‘Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production’, Review of International Political Economy, 7(4) (2000), pp. 645–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Amyx, Japan’s Financial Crisis: Institutional Rigidity and Reluctant Change (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Anderson, ‘Japanese Insolvency Law after a Decade of Reform’, Canadian Business Law Journal, 43 (2006), pp. 2–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Aoki, ‘Comparing Japanese and American Industrial Effluent Control: A Case Study of the Consequences of Contrasting Regulatory Styles’, Law & Policy, 22 (3/4) (2000), pp. 319–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Aoki, ‘Conclusion: Whither Japan’s Corporate Governance’, in M. Aoki, G. Jackson and H. Miyajima (eds.), Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 427–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • M. Aoki, G. Jackson and H. Miyajima (eds.), Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Aoki, ‘Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy’ (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • T. Araki, ‘A Comparative Analysis: Corporate Governance and Labor and Employment Relations in Japan’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 22 (2000), pp. 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Araki, ‘Labor Law Scholarship in Japan’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 23 (2002), pp. 735–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Araki, ‘Corporate Governance Reforms, Labor Law Developments, and the Future of Japan’s Practice-Dependent Stakeholder Model’, Japan Labor Review, 2(1) (2005), pp. 26–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Araki, ‘Changing Employment Practices, Corporate Governance, and the Role of Labor Law in Japan’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 28(2) (2007), pp. 251–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Bailey, D. Coffey, P. Tomlinson (eds.), Crisis or Recovery in Japan: State and Industrial Economy (Cheltenham, UP and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.M. Blair and M.J. Roe, ‘Introduction’, in M.M. Blair and M.J. Roe (eds.), Employees and Corporate Governance (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Blanpain, S. Bisom-Rapp, W.R. Corbett, H.K. Josephs and M.J. Zimmer (eds.), The Global Workplace: International and Comparative Employment Law–Cases and Materials (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Block, ‘Towards a New Understanding of Economic Modernity’, in C. Joerges, J. Strath and P. Wagner (eds.), The Economy as a Polity: The Political Constitution of Contemporary Capitalism (London: UCL Press, 2005), pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Blomstrom and S. La Croix (eds.), Institutional Change in Japan (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyer, ‘The Diversity and Future of Capitalisms: A Regulationist Analysis’, in G.M. Hodgson, M. Itoh and N. Yokokawa (eds.), Capitalism in Evolution: Global Contentions–East and West (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001), pp. 100–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyer, ‘How and Why Capitalisms Differ’, Economy and Society, 34(4) (2005), pp. 509–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyer, ‘Capitalism Strikes Back: Why and What Consequences for Social Sciences?’ Revue de la Regulation, 1 (2007), pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyer and M. Juillard, ‘The Wage Labour Nexus Challenged: More the Consequence than the Cause of the Crisis’, in R. Boyer and T. Yamada (eds.), Japanese Capitalism: A Regulationist Perspective (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 119–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyer and T. Yamada, ‘Conclusion: An Epochal Change... But Uncertain Futures’, in R. Boyer and T. Yamada (eds.), Japanese Capitalism: A Regulationist Perspective (London: Routledge, 2000a), pp. 192–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyer and T. Yamada, ‘Introduction: A Puzzle for Economic Theories’, in R. Boyer and T. Yamada (eds.), Japanese Capitalism: A Regulationist Perspective (London: Routledge, 2000b), pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyer and T. Yamada (eds.), Japanese Capitalism: A Regulationist Perspective (London: Routledge, 2000c).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Buchanan and S. Deakin, ‘Japan’s Paradoxical Response to the New “Global Standard” in Corporate Governance’, Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy Research Paper, 3(5) (2007), pp. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Buchele and J. Christainsen, ‘Do Employment and Income Security Cause Unemployment?: A Comparative Study of the US and the E-4’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(1) (1998), pp. 117–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Burkett and M. Hart-Landsberg, ‘The Use and Abuse of Japan as a Progressive Model’, in L. Panitch (ed.), The Socialist Register 1996 (London: Merlin Press, 1996), pp. 62–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Burns, Sexual Violence and the Law in Japan (London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • L.E. Carlile, ‘The Japanese Labor Movement and Institutional Reform’, in M. Blomstrom and S. La Croix (eds.), Institutional Change in Japan (Oxford and New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 177–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Caton, ‘Market Update–October 2008’, (2008), available at http://www.bt.com.au, accessed on 11 November 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Citrin and A. Wolfson, ‘Japan’s Back! After its Lost Decade, Japan’s Economy Is Set on a Recovery Path’, Finance and Development, 3(2) (2006), available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2006/06/citrin.htm, accessed on 31 March 2009.

  • D. Coates, ‘The Rise and Fall of Japan as a Model of “Progressive Capitalism”’, in D. Bailey, D. Coffey and P. Tomlinson (eds.), Crisis or Recovery in Japan: State and Industrial Economy (Cheltenham, UP and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2005), pp. 179–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Coates, ‘Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era’ (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Cook and H. McKay, ‘Japan: Ripe for Reassessment’, Lowy Institute: Perspectives (2006), pp. 1–35, available at www.lowyinstitute.org, accessed on 30 March 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Coriat, P. Geoffron and M. Rubinstein, ‘Some Limitations to Japanese Competitiveness’, in R. Boyer and T. Yamada (eds.), Japanese Capitalism: A Regulationist Perspective (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 175–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Crouch, ‘Models of Capitalism’, New Political Economy, 10(4) (2005), pp. 439–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Deakin, P. Lele and M.M. Siems, ‘The Evolution of Labour Law: Calibrating and Comparing Regulatory Regimes’, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper, 352 (2007), pp. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dore, ‘What Makes the Japanese Different?’, in C. Crouch and D. Marquand (eds.), Ethics and Markets: Co-operation and Competition within Capitalist Economies (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers and the Political Quarterly Publishing Co. Ltd, 1993), pp. 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dore, ‘Asian Crisis and the Future of the Japanese Model’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22 (1998), pp. 773–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Dore, ‘Will Global Capitalism Be Anglo-Saxon Capitalism?’, New Left Review, 6 (2000), pp. 101–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Dore, W. Lazonick and M. O’Sullivan, ‘Varieties of Capitalism in the Twentieth Century’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 15(4) (1999), pp. 102–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Drysdale, ‘Reflections on the Relationship with Japan’, Japanese Studies, 24(2) (2004), pp. 159–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Engelen, ‘Corporate Governance, Property and Democracy: A Conceptual Critique of Shareholder Ideology’, Economy and Society, 31(3) (2002), pp. 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.H. Foote, ‘Judicial Creation of Norms in Japanese Labor Law: Activism in the Service of–Stability?’, UCLA Law review, 43 (1996), pp. 635–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Freeman, ‘The “National System of Innovation” in Historical Perspective’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1) (1995), pp. 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.J. Frenkel, ‘Industrial Sociology and Workplace Relations in Advanced Capitalist Societies’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 27 (1/2) (1986), pp. 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Fujita, ‘Neo-Industrial Tokyo: Urban Development and Globalisation in Japan’s State-centred Developmental Capitalism’, Urban Studies, 40(2) (2003), pp. 249–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Gaston and T. Kishi, ‘Labour Market Policy Development in Japan: Following an Australian Lead?’, The Australian Economic Review, 38(4) (2005), pp. 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Gilson, ‘Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function’, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 49(2) (2001), pp. 329–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Ginsburg and G. Hoetker, ‘The Unreluctant Litigant? An Empirical Analysis of Japan’s Turn to Litigation’, Journal of Legal Studies, 35 (2006), pp. 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Gomez Garrido, ‘Work, Employment and Activity: Reflections on the History of a Fictitious Commodity’, in C. Joerges, J. Strath and P. Wagner (eds.), The Economy as a Polity: The Political Constitution of Contemporary Capitalism (London: UCL Press, 2005), pp. 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Gospel and A. Pendleton, ‘Finance, Corporate Governance and the Management of Labour: A Conceptual and Comparative Analysis’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(3) (2003), pp. 557–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.O. Haley, ‘Heisei Renewal or Heisei Transformation: Are Legal Reforms Really Changing Japan?’ Journal of Japanese Law, 19 (2005), pp. 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.O. Haley, ‘Litigation in Japan: A New Look at Old Problems’, Williamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution, 10 (2002), pp. 121–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.O. Haley, ‘Law and Culture in China and Japan: A Framework for Analysis’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 27 (2006), pp. 895–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.O. Haley, ‘The Spirit of Japanese Law’ (Athens: The University of Georgia Press, 1998). D. Hall, ‘Japanese Spirit, Western Economics: The Continuing Salience of Economic Nationalism in Japan’, New Political Economy, 9(1) (2004), pp. 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Hanami, ‘Was the Modern Labor Law Accepted in Postwar Japan?’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 23 (2002), pp. 749–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Hansmann and R. Kraakman, ‘The End of History for Corporate Law’, Georgetown Law Journal, 89(6) (2001), pp. 439–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Hay, ‘Contemporary Capitalism, Globalization Regionalization and the Persistence of National Variation’, Review of International Studies, 26(4) (2000), pp. 509–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Hollingsworth, ‘Continuities and Changes in Social Systems of Production: The Cases of Japan, Germany, and the United States’, in J.R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (eds.), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997a), pp. 265–310.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Hollingsworth, ‘The Institutional Embeddedness of American Capitalism’, in C. Crouch and W. Streeck (eds.), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity (London: Sage Publications, 1997b), pp. 133–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • G. Hong, ‘The Concept of Capital-Control Complex (CCC): The Case of Japan’, Review of Radical Political Economies, 36(3) (2004), pp. 344–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Inagami and D.H. Whittaker, The New Community Firm: Employment, Governance and Management Reform in Japan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • K. Iwai, ‘Do Corporations Belong to their Shareholders? U.S.-Style Shareholder Rights Orientation will not Become the Mainstream in the Twenty-First Century’, The Japanese Economy, 33(4) (2005–06), pp. 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Jackson, ‘Employment Adjustment and Distributional Conflict’, in M. Aoki, G. Jackson and H. Miyajima (eds.), Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007a), pp. 282–309.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • G. Jackson, ‘The Turnaround of 1997: Changes in Japanese Corporate Law and Governance’, in M. Aoki, G. Jackson and H. Miyajima (eds.), Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007b), pp. 310–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Jackson and H. Miyajama, ‘Introduction: The Diversity and Change of Corporate Governance in Japan’, in M. Aoki, G. Jackson and H. Miyajima (eds.), Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 1–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • S.M. Jacoby, ‘Corporate Governance and Society’, Challenge, 48(4) (2005a), pp. 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.M. Jacoby, ‘Business and Society in Japan and the United States’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(4) (2005b),pp. 617–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.M. Jacoby, The Embedded Corporation: Corporate Governance and Employment Relations in Japan and the United States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005c).

    Google Scholar 

  • S.M. Jacoby, E.M. Nason and S. Kazuro, ‘Corporate Organization in Japan and the United States: Is There Evidence of Convergence?’, Social Science Japan Journal, 8(1) (2005), pp. 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.T. Johnson, The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Johnstone and R. Mitchell, ‘Regulating Work’, in C. Parker, C. Scott, N. Lacey and J. Braithewaite (eds.), Regulating Law (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 101–21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Kelemen and E.C. Sibbitt, ‘The Americanization of Japanese Law’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 23 (2002), pp. 269–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kettler and C.T. Tackney, ‘Light from a Dead Sun: The Japanese Lifetime Employment System and Weimar Labor Law’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 19 (1997), pp. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Kitamura, ‘Regulatory Enforcement in Local Government in Japan’, Law & Policy, 22 (3/4) (2000), pp. 305–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks and J.D. Stephens, ‘Convergence and Divergence in Advanced Capitalist Democracies’, in H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks and J.D. Stephens (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 427–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • T.Y. Kong, ‘Globalization and Labour Market Reform: Patterns of Response in Northeast Asia’, British Journal of Political Science, 36 (2006), pp. 359–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.J. Konzelmann, ‘Varieties of Capitalism: Production and Market Relations in the USA and Japan’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(4) (2005), pp. 593–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Koshiro, ‘Formal and Informal Aspects of Labor Dispute Resolution in Japan’, Law & Policy, 22 (3/4) (2000), pp. 353–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Kotz, ‘Neoliberalism and the Social Structure of Accumulation Theory of Long-Run Capital’, Review of Radical Political Economies, 35(3) (2003), pp. 263–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Kotz, ‘Institutional Structure or Social Structure of Accumulation’, in T. McDonough, M. Reich, D.M. Kotz, and M.-A. Gonzalez-Perez (eds.), Growth and Crisis, Social Structure of Accumulation Theory and Analysis (Galway: National University of Ireland, 2006), pp. 50–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.-K. Kwon, ‘Japanese Employment Relations in Transition’, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 25(3) (2004), pp. 325–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. La Croix and A. Kawaura, ‘Institutional Change in Japan: Theories, Evidence and Reflections’, in M. Blomstrom and S. La Croix (eds.), Institutional Change in Japan (Oxford and New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 15–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Lazonick, ‘Business Organization and Competitive Advantage: Capitalist Transformations in the Twentieth Century’, in G. Dosi, R. Giannette and P.A. Toninelli (eds.), Technology and Enterprise in a Historical Perspective (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), pp. 119–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Lazonick and M. O’Sullivan, ‘Finance and Industrial Development. Part I: The United States and the United Kingdom’, Financial History Review, 4 (1997a), pp. 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Lazonick and M. O’Sullivan, ‘Finance and Industrial Development. Part II: The United States and the United Kingdom’, Financial History Review, 4 (1997b), pp. 117–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Lippit, ‘Social Structure of Accumulation Theory’, in T. McDonough, M. Reich, D.M. Kotz and M.-A. Gonzalez-Perez (eds.), Growth and Crisis, Social Structure of Accumulation Theory and Analysis (Galway: National University of Ireland, 2006), pp. 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Marsden, ‘Book Review’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 26 (2004), pp. 151–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Marshall, ‘Hedging Around the Question of the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Labour Regulation’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 18 (2005), pp. 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Matsukura, N. Ogawa and R.L. Clark, ‘Analysis of Employment Patterns and the Changing Demographic Structures of Japan’, The Japanese Economy, 35(1) (2007), pp. 82–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.P. McAlinn, ‘Employment and Labor’, in G.P. McAlinn (ed) Japanese Business Law (Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands/Austin, Texas: Wolters Kluwer, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.T. McCluskey, ‘The Substantive Politics of Formal Corporate Power’, Buffalo Law Review, 53 (2006), pp. 1453–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. McDonough, ‘SSA Theory: The State of the Art’, in T. McDonough, M. Reich, D.M. Kotz and M.-A. Gonzalez-Perez (eds.), Growth and Crisis, Social Structure of Accumulation Theory and Analysis (Galway: National University of Ireland, 2006), pp. 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.J. Milhaupt, ‘A Lost Decade for Japanese Corporate Governance Reform? What has Changed, What hasn’t, and Why’, in M. Blomstrom and S. La Croix (eds.), Institutional Change in Japan (Oxford and New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.J. Milhaupt and M.D. West, ‘Law’s Dominion and the Market for Legal Elites in Japan’, Law and Policy in International Business, 34(2) (2003), pp. 451–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Morgan and I. Kubo, ‘Beyond Path Dependence? Constructing New Models for Institutional Change: The Case of Capital Markets in Japan’, Socio-Economic Review, 3 (2005), pp. 55–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Moriguchi and H. Ono, ‘Japanese Lifelong Employment: A Century’s Perspective’, in M. Blomstrom and S. La Croix (eds.), Institutional Change in Japan (Oxford and New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 152–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Morozumi, ‘Special Protection, Equality, and Beyond: Working Life and Parenthood under Japanese Labor Law’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 27 (2006), pp. 513–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Mouer and H. Kawanishi, A Sociology of Work in Japan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Nakamura, ‘Corporate Governance and Management Practices in Japan: Current Issues’, Corporate Ownership and Control, 1(2) (2004), pp. 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Niita, ‘Are there “National Styles” of Social Science and Labor Scholarship?: Reflections on Industrial Relations Research in Japan’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 23 (2002), pp. 895–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Nottage, L. Wolff and K. Anderson (eds.), Corporate Governance in the 21st Century: Japan’s Gradual Transformation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Ogawa, ‘Financial Distress and Employment: The Japanese Case in the 90s’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 9646 (2003), pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.A. O’Hara, ‘A New Transnational Corporate Social Structure of Accumulation for Long-Wave Upswing in the World Economy?’, Review of Radical Political Economies, 36(3) (2004), pp. 328–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Ono, ‘Lifetime Employment in Japan: Concepts and Measurements’, SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, 624 (2007), pp. 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Owan, ‘Promotion, Turnover, Earnings, and Firm-Sponsored Training’, Journal of Labor Economics, 22(4) (2004), pp. 955–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. S. Ozaki, Human Capitalism: The Japanese Enterprise System As World Model (Tokyo/New York: Kodansha International, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Pendleton and S. Deakin, ‘Japan’s Paradoxical Response to the New ‘Global Standard in Corporate Governance’, European Corporate Governance Institute Law Working Paper, 87 (2007), pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Perkin, ‘The Third Revolution and Stakeholder Capitalism: Convergence or Collapse?’, Political Quarterly, 67(3) (1996), pp. 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.W. Puchniak, ‘The 2002 Reform of the Management of Large Corporations in Japan: A Race to Somewhere?’, Australian Journal of Asian Law, 5 (2003), pp. 42–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Radice, ‘“Globalization” and National Differences’, Competition and Change, 3 (1998), pp. 263–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Radice, ‘Globalization and National Capitalisms: Theorizing Convergence and Differentiation’, Review of International Political Economy, 7(4) (2000), pp. 719–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Ramseyer and M. Nakazato, Japanese Law: An Economic Approach (London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Rebick, The Japanese Employment System: Adapting to a New Economic Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Reich, ‘Changes in Capitalism since the Reagan Era: The New Social Structure of Accumulation’, in T. McDonough, M. Reich, D.M. Kotz and M.-A. Gonzalez-Perez (eds.), Growth and Crisis, Social Structure of Accumulation Theory and Analysis (Galway: National University of Ireland, 2006), pp. 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Roe and M.J. Gilson, ‘Lifetime Employment: Labor Peace and the Evolution of Japanese Corporate Governance’, Columbia Law Review, 99 (1999), pp. 508–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Sako, ‘Does Embeddedness Imply Limits to Within-Country Diversity?’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(4) (2005), pp. 585–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Sako, Shifting Boundaries of the Firm: Japanese Company-Japanese Labour (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Sako, ‘Organizational Diversity and Institutional Change: Evidence from Financial and Labor Markets’, in M. Aoki, G. Jackson and H. Miyajima (eds.), Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 399–426.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • U. Schaede, ‘Competition for Corporate Control: Institutional Investors, Investment Funds, and Hostile Takeovers in Japan’, Center on Japanese Economy and Business, Columbia Business School Working Paper, 248 (2006), pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Slater, ‘From Calculation to Alienation: Disentangling Economic Abstractions’, Economy and Society, 31(2) (2002), pp. 234–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Soskice,‘Reinterpreting Corporatism and ExplainingUnemployment: Co-ordinated and Non-c o-ordinated Market Economies’, in R. Brunetta and C. Dell’Arringa (eds.), Labour Relations and Economic Performance: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economic Association in Venice, Italy (London: Macmillan, 1990), pp. 170–211.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • J.A.A. Stockwin, ‘Why Japan Still Matters’, Japan Forum, 15(3) (2003) , pp. 345–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Practices and Shifting Risks in the United States’, UCLA School of Law Law & Economics Research Paper, 07–03 (2007), pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Streeck and K.A. Thelen, ‘Introduction’, in W. Streeck and K.A. Thelen (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.K. Tabb, ‘The End of the Japanese Postwar System’, Monthly Review, 22 (1999), pp. 773–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Takahashi and S. Madoka, ‘The Future of Japanese Corporate Governance: The 2005 Reform’, Journal of Japanese Law, 19 (2005), pp. 35–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Tanase, ‘Kataritoshite no Ho Enyo–Ho no Monogatari to Bengoshi Rinri (1)’, Minshoho Zasshi, 111(4) (1995a), pp. 677–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Tanase, ‘Kataritoshite no Ho Enyo–Ho no Monogatari to Bengoshi Rinri (1)’, Minshoho Zasshi, 111(6) (1995b), pp. 865–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Tsuruta, ‘Respecting Differences in the Anglo-American, European, and Japanese Models of Capitalism’, The Japanese Economy, 33(2) (2005), pp. 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.D. West, Law in Everyday Japan: Sex, Sumo, Suicide, and Statutes (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Wilthagen and F. Tros, ‘The Concept of “Flexicurity”: A New Approach to Regulating Employment and Labor Markets’, Transfer 2 (2004), pp. 166–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.H. Wolfson, ‘Neoliberalism and the Social Structure of Accumulation’, Review of Radical Political Economies, 35(3) (2003), pp. 255–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.H. Wolfson, ‘Class, Crisis, and the Theory of a Social Structure of Accumulation’, in T. McDonough, M. Reich, D.M. Kotz and M.-A. Gonzalez-Perez (eds.), Growth and Crisis, Social Structure of Accumulation Theory and Analysis (Galway: National University of Ireland, 2006), pp. 106–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Yamada, ‘Japanese Capitalism and the Companyist Compromise’, in R. Boyer and T. Yamada (eds.), Japanese Capitalism: A Regulationist Perspective (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Yamakawa, ‘Labor Law Reform in Japan: A Response to Recent Socio-Economic Changes’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 49 (2001), pp. 627–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Leon Wolff

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolff, L. (2010). Lifelong Employment, Labor Law and the Lost Decade: The End of a Job for Life in Japan?. In: Haghirian, P. (eds) Innovation and Change in Japanese Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250536_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics