Abstract
Most successful companies have formal procedures to regularly evaluate the performance of their employees and organizational performance. However, until comparatively recently very few companies have evaluated the effectiveness of their board. In 2002, Professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld commented that effective board evaluation was simply not taking place:
I can’t think of a single work group whose performance gets assessed less rigorously than corporate boards. (Sonnenfeld, J., 2002)
The situation has moved on significantly in recent years. Board evaluation has rapidly become one of the key areas for developing boards.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ASX (2007), Revised corporate governance principles and recommendations, ASX Corporate Governance Council, Sydney. Available at www.ecgi.org.
Barclays Bank Annual Report (2008), Available at www.barclays.com (accessed 18/11/2008).
College Retirement Equities Fund (2007), Policy Statement on Corporate Governance, Teacher Insurance and Annuity Association, New York, p. 14. Available at www.tiaa-cref.org/pubs/pdf/goverrnance_policy.pdf.
DIFX, Dubai International Foreign Exchange Annual Review (2006), www.difx.ae (accessed 18/11/2008).
ICA, Instituto de Consejeros Administradores (2005), Principles of Good Governance, ICA, Madrid www.iconsejeros.com accessed 18/11/2008
ICSA, Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators (2008), Survey on Board Evaluation Practices in the UK, ICSA, London.
Kiel, G., Nicholson, G. and Barclay, M. (2005), Board, Director and CEO Evaluation, McGraw-Hill, Sydney.
Leblanc, R. and Gillies, J. (2005), Inside the Boardroom, Wiley, Toronto.
Mudara (2008), Middle East and North Africa Institute of Directors, Dubai, www.NACDonline.org (accessed 18/11/2008).
National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), Washington, DC, www.NACDonline.org.
NYSE (2003), Final NYSE corporate governance rules, Available at www.ecgi.org.
Sonnenfeld, J. (2002), What makes great boards great, Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 113.
Spanish Unified Code (2006), Comision Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV), Madrid, available in English at www.ecgi.org.
The Combined Code (2008), Financial Reporting Council, London, p. 9. Available at www.ecgi.org/codes/all_codes.php
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) (2006), Corporate Governance Guidelines, TSX, Toronto, www.TSX.com (accessed 18/11/2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Chris Pierce
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pierce, C. (2009). International Board Evaluation: Trends and Practices. In: Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N. (eds) Global Boards. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250512_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250512_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30328-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-25051-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)