Skip to main content
  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

Researchers of the Russian economy have unanimously identified the most important features of stock ownership and control. First, the concentration of capital in the corporate sector resulting from its aggressive redistribution for more than 15 years tends to be high. Second, the high concentration of ownership affected the development of corporate control and evolution of the mechanisms of corporate governance (Natsional’nyi Doklad 2008). This high concentration provides the basis for control by the majority shareholder or a consolidated group of such shareholders exercised by various formal and informal means (Dolgopyatova 2003, chapter 2). Majority shareholders are constrained only by the need to comply with the formal legal provisions and often imitate the activities of intra-corporate tools (bodies) (Razvitie Sprosa 2003). Third, the prevailing model of corporate control is that in which majority shareholders participate directly in management as top managers of companies (Insiders and Outsiders 2004; Stiglitz 1999). A combination of ownership and control has become a formal institution of Russian corporate practices, which restrict the demand for “outside” managers who do not own company shares. This institution has become widespread not only as a result of privatization (“red directors” becoming owners of enterprises) but also as a tool intentionally chosen by owners who established their businesses from scratch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aukutsionek, S., Dyomina, N., & Kapelyushnikov, R. (2007) Ownership structure of Russian industrial enterprises in 2007, Russian Economic Barometer, 16/3: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernykh, L. (2008) Ultimate ownership and control in Russia, Journal of Financial Economics, 88: 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deryabina, M. (2001) Restrukturizatsiya rossiiskoi ekonomiki cherez peredel sobstvennosti i kontrolya, Voprosy Ekonomiki, 10: 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgopyatova, T. (2001) Modeli i mekhanizmy korporativnogo kontrolya v rossiiskoi promyshlennosti, Voprosy Ekonomiki, 5: 46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgopyatova, T. (ed.) (2003) Russian Industry: Institutional Development (Moscow: SU-HSE Publishing House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgopyatova, T. (2007) Corporate ownership and control in Russian companies: Trends and patterns. In: Dallago, B. & Iwasaki I. (eds), Corporate Restructuring and Governance in Transitional Economies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgopyatova, T. & Uvarova, O. (2006) Empiricheskii analiz transformatsii sobstven-nosti, effektivnosti i investitsionnoi deyatel’nosti promyshlennykh predpriyatii, Ekonomicheskaya Nayka Sovremennoi Rossii, 1: 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, J. & Telegdy A. (2001) Privatization and productivity in Romanian industry: Evidence from a comprehensive enterprise panel. Discussion paper No. 326. Bonn: Institute of the Study of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golikova, V. et al. (2003) Spros na pravo v oblasti korporativnogo upravleniya: Empiricheskie svidetel’stva. In: Razvitie Sprosa na Pravovoe Regulirovanie Korporativnogo Upravleniya v Chastnom Sektore, Seriya “Nauchnye Doklady: Nezavisimyi Ekonomicheskii Analiz,” No. 148: 229–239 (Moscow: Moskovskii obshchestvennyi nauchnyi fond i “Proekty dlya budushchego”) (available at: http://www.mpsf.org/lib.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfeld, I. & Tressel, T. (2002) Competition and ownership structure: Substitutes or complements? Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange, Economics of Transition, 10: 525–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guriev, S. et al. (2003) Korporativnoe Upravleniye v Rossiiskoi Promyshlennosti, Seriya “Nauchnye Doklady: Nezavisimyi Ekonomicheskii Analiz,” No. 149 (Moscow: Moskovskii obshchestvennyi nauchnyi fond i Tsenter ekonomicheskikh i finans-ovykh issledovanii i razrabotok) (available at: http://www.mpsf.org/lib.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanousek, J., Kocenda, E., & Svejnar, J. (2004) Ownership, control and corporate performance after large-scale privatization. Working paper No. 652. Ann Arbor: William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insiders and Outsiders (2004) Insiders, outsiders, and good corporate governance in transitional economies: Cases of Russia and Bulgaria. Working paper No. 2–5. TTPP (available at www.ttpp.info/library).

  • Kabalina, V. (ed.) (2005) Praktiki Upravleniya Personalom na Sovremennykh Rossiiskikh Predpriyatiyakh (Moscow: Institut sravnitel’nykh issledovanii trudovykh otnoshenii).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapelyushnikov, R. (2001) Sobstvennost’ i control’ v rossiiskoi promyshlennosti, VoprosyEkonomiki, 12: 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapelyushnikov, R. & Dyomina, N. (2005) Vliyanie kharakteristik sobstvennosti na rezul’taty ekonomicheskoi deyatel’nosti rossiiskikh promyshlennykh predpriyatii, Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2: 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocenda, E. & Svejnar, J. (2002) The effect of ownership forms and concentration on firm performance after large-scale privatization. Working paper No. 471. Ann Arbor: William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov, P. & Muravyev, A. (2000) Struktura aktsionernogo kapitala i rezul’taty deyatel’nosti firm v Rossii: Analiz “golubykh fishek” fondovogo rynka, Ekonomicheskii Zhurnal VShE, 4/4: 475–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2006) OECD Economic Surveys: Russian Federation 2006 (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panov, A. & Borissov, N. (2006) Samyi glavnyi investor, Vedomosti, February 13: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervyi Vypusk (2008) Natsional’nyi Doklad po Korporativnomu Upravleniyu (Moscow: Natsional’nyi sovet po korporativnomu upravleniyu).

    Google Scholar 

  • Radygin, A. & Entov, R. (2001) Korporativnoe upravlenie i zashita prav sobstvennosti: Empiricheskii analiz i aktual’nye napravleniya reform. Nauchnye Trudy Instituta Ekonomiki Perekhodnogo Perioda No. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radygin, A. (2001) Sobstvennost’ i integratsionnye protsessy v korporativnom sek-tore (nekotorye novye tendentsii), Voprosy Ekonomiki, 5: 26–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razvitie Sprosa na Pravovoe Regulirovanie Korporativnogo Upravleniya v Chastnom Sektore (2008) Seriya “Nauchnye Doklady: Nezavisimyi Ekonomicheskii Analiz,” No. 148 (Moscow: Moskovskii obshchestvennyi nauchnyi fond & “Proekty dlya budushchego”) (available at: http://www.mpsf.org/lib.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard & Poor’s (S&P) (2007a) Issledovaniye Informatsionnoi Prozrachnosti Rossiiskikh Kompanii v 2007 Gody: Znachitel’nye Izmeneniya v Desyatke Liderov (Moscow: Standard & Poor’s, November 14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard & Poor’s (S&P) (2007b) Portret Soveta Direktorov Rossiiskoi Kompanii kak Otrazheniye Kontsentrirovannoi Struktury Sobstvennosti Kompanii i Prepyatstvii na Pyti Razvitiya Korporativnogo Upravleniya (Moscow: Standard & Poor’s, March 16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simachyev, Yu. (2001) Napravleniya i factory reformirovaniya promyshlennykh predpriyatii, Ekonomicheskii Zhurnal VShE, 5/3: 328–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1999) Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Corporate governance failures in the transition. Paper presented at the World Bank’s Annual Conference on Development Economics (ABCDE), Paris, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troika Dialog (2008) Who owns Russia? Corporate governance annual (Moscow).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakovlev, A. (2003) Spros na pravo v sfere korporativnogo upravleniya: Evolutsiya strategii ekonomicheskikh agentov, Voprosy Ekonomiki, 4: 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakovlev, A. (2004) Obuchenie deistviem, Ekspert, 3: 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakovlev, A., Golikova, V., Dolgopyatova T., & Simachyev, Yu. (2006) Corporate governance in transition: New trends and challenges, In: Sell, A. & Krylov, A. (eds), Corporate Governance (Francfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasin, E.G. (ed.) (2004) Structural Changes in the Russian Industry (Moscow: SU-HSE Publishing House).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Tatiana G. Dolgopyatova

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dolgopyatova, T.G. (2009). Stock Ownership and Corporate Control. In: Dolgopyatova, T., Iwasaki, I., Yakovlev, A.A. (eds) Organization and Development of Russian Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230249493_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics