Skip to main content

Convergence in Innovation

  • Chapter
Book cover Changes in Innovation

Abstract

In the literature of economics and innovation, the concept of convergence has been approached from a plurality of perspectives. Most commonly, convergence has been understood in technological terms or in the context of regional economic development within or between nations. In the past, the innovation concept, however, has not been linked explicitly to convergence. During the last decades, by contrast, innovation has emerged in the discussions related to national and sectoral systems of innovations, as well as in the growth and development policy of EU. Here, innovation has become very prominent as a means of convergence. Despite of the emerging role of innovation in these discussions, innovations and innovativeness has always been analyzed with help of some proxies (like patents, R&D investments, etc.). Characteristics of innovations and innovation processes have not been taken more systematically into account when new policies are planned and executed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramovitz, M. (1986) ‘Catching Up, Forging Ahead and Falling Behind’, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 46, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D. (1988) ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review, Vol. 78. No. 4, pp. 678–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D. (1991) ‘R&D, Firm Size, and Innovative Activity’, in Z. Acs and D. Audretsch (eds), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D. and Möller, K. (1993) ‘Monitoring the Technological Performance of a Small Economy Using Patent Data: The Case of Denmark’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 5, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruland, K. and Mowery, D. (2005) ‘Innovation Through Time’, in J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E. D. (1967) Why Growth Rates Differ, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1982) ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change’, Research Policy, Vol. 11, pp. 147–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988) ‘Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 26, pp. 1120–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., Pavitt, K. and Soete, L. (1990) The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eela, R. (2001) ‘Suomen teknologiapolitiikka valtion tiede- ja teknologianeuvoston katsausten valossa’ (Finnish Technology Policy in the Light of the Reviews of the Science and Technology Policy Council), VTT, Group for Technology Studies, Working Papers 56, Espoo, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfvengren, E. (1958) Kostnaderna för teknisk naturvetenskaplig och ekonomics forskning i Finland, Taloudellinen Tutkimuskeskus, Helsinki: Sarja B, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1987) Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. and Soete, L. (1997) The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd edn, London and Washington: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1984) ‘Introduction’, in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity, Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 1–19.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1995) ‘R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues’, in P. Stoneman (ed.), The Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijs, J. (2003) ‘Freerider Behaviour and the Public Finance of R&D Activities in Enterprises: The Case of the Spanish Low Interest Credits for R&D’, Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 445–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, F. (1986) ‘Technological Diversification of Japanese Industry’, Science, Vol. 233. pp. 291–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemola, T. (2002a) ‘Tiede- ja teknologiapolitiikan muotoutuminen’, in Päiviö Tommila and Allan Tiitta (eds), Suomen Tieteen Historia, Helsinki: WSOY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemola, T. (2002b) ‘Convergence of National Science and Technology Policies: The Case of Finland’, Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 1481–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemola, T. (2003) ‘Innovation Policy in Finland’, in P. Biegelbauer and S. Borrás (eds), Innovation Policies in Europe and the US, Ashgate: The New Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingärde, S. and Saarinen, J. (2004) ‘Technological Specialisation in Sweden and Finland 1963–97: Contrasting Developments’, in J. Ljungberg and J.-P. Smits (eds), Technology and Human Capital in Historical Perspective, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 205–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lönnqvist, K. and Nykänen, P. (1999) ‘Teknologiapolitiikan alkuvaiheet Suomessa 1940–1970 luvuilla’, VTT, Group for Technology Studies, Working Papers No. 40/99, VTT, Espoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1988) ‘The Speed and Cost of Industrial Innovation in Japan and United States: External vs Internal Technology’, Management Science, Vol. 34, October, pp. 1157–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1977) ‘In Search of Useful Theory of Innovation’, Research Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 36–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (ed.) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1963) Science and the Policies of Governments: The Implications of Science and Technology for National and International Affairs, OECD: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1986) OECD Science and Technology Indicators, OECD: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1993) Frascati Manual, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1997) National Innovation Systems, OECD: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984) ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 343–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, G. F. (1988) ‘Finnish Patenting Activity’, ETLA Discussion Papers No. 263, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen, J. (2005) ‘Innovations and Industrial Performance in Finland 1945–98’, Lund Studies in Economic History, Vol. 34, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1967) ‘Research and Development Resource Allocation Under Rivalry’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1911) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen entwicklung, Leipzig: Duncker & Humboldt. English translation, The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard, 1934; 8th edn, 1968, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper & Brothers, Harper Colophon edition 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland (1996) Finland: A Knowledge-Based Society, Helsinki: Oy Edita Ab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland (2000) Review 2000: The Challenge of Knowledge and Know-How, Helsinki: Oy Edita Ab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland (2003) Knowledge, Innovation and Internationalisation, Helsinki: Oy Edita Ab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen, H. (2000) ‘Software Innovation in Finland’, VTT, Group for Technology Studies. Working Papers No. 52/00, VTT, Espoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnudd, E. (1958) ‘Teknillisestä tutkimuspanoksesta meillä ja muualla’, Paperi ja Puu, No. 5, pp. 269–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Jani Saarinen and Robert van der Have

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saarinen, J., van der Have, R. (2009). Convergence in Innovation. In: Saarinen, J., Rilla, N. (eds) Changes in Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248625_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics