Skip to main content

Abstract

I stopped using the term ‘Third Way’ several years ago, frustrated by my inability to get people to understand what I meant by it. For me it was all about bringing social democracy up to date, not an attempt to find a middle ground between left and right, a sort of fuzzy compromise. I wanted to help develop a political philosophy and practice that would move beyond statist socialism and market fundamentalism, not tread the middle of the road between them. Such an approach also had to come to terms with the rise of issues and problems that do not fit classical right-left distinctions, such as environmental problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Anthony (Lord) Giddens

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(Lord) Giddens, A. (2010). Response to Atkins and Leggett. In: Griffiths, S., Hickson, K. (eds) British Party Politics and Ideology after New Labour. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248557_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics