Advertisement

‘A most efficient body of officers’: Surgeon superintendents and their responsibilities

  • Robin Haines

Abstract

From 1849, owners of British emigrant vessels carrying 300 or more passengers wherever they were bound, or every vessel crossing the tropics ‘with more than fifty passengers and an anticipated voyage time exceeding eighty days under sail or forty-five with steam’, were required by the Passenger Acts, to supply a surgeon. He was to be endowed with authority to enforce regulations necessary for the preservation of health. These revised provisions of the Passenger Acts had no jurisdiction over American-owned vessels, except when they carried emigrants to colonial destinations on vessels chartered on behalf of colonial governments. Under the Acts, authorities expected surgeons to ‘exact obedience to rules and regulations made for preserving order and securing cleanliness and ventilation’.1 The Emigration Commission’s instructions to surgeons, who were hired to superintend each government-chartered vessel from 1831, and official procedures as set down in each Charter Party, went much further than the Passenger Acts. The surgeons’ performances were strictly scrutinised unlike those of their peers on private ships, although on the Australian route most private shippers of fare-paying steerage emigrants adopted the routines that had proven so successful on government-chartered ships.

Keywords

Eighteenth Century Shipping Company Slave Trade Whooping Cough Walnut Shell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 7.
    For analyses of convict mortality see John McDonald and Ralph Shlomowitz, ‘Mortality on convict voyages to Australia, 1788–1868’, Social Science History, 13, 1989, 285–313, reproduced in Shlomowitz, Mortality and Migration, II.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 8.
    On Dolben’s Act and its aftermath, see O. MacDonagh, A Pattern of Government Growth 1800–60, MacGibbon Kee, London, 1961.Google Scholar
  3. 9.
    A brief sample of the most relevant and influential publications of these prolific pioneering maritime surgeons include J. Lind, An essay on the most effectual means of preserving the health of seamen in the Royal Navy, 1757, 3rd edn 1774Google Scholar
  4. T. Trotter, Medicina Nautica: an essay on the diseases of seamen, 2 vols, 1797–9Google Scholar
  5. G. Blane, Observations on the diseases of seamen, 3 edns, 1785–99Google Scholar
  6. J. Veitch, A letter to the Commissioners for Transports and Sick and Wounded Seamen, 1818Google Scholar
  7. S. De Monchy, An essay on the causes and cure of the usual diseases in voyages to the West Indies, 1762Google Scholar
  8. J. Pringle, A discourse upon some late improvements of the means for preserving the health of mariners, delivered at the anniversary meeting of the Royal Society, 30 November 1776, in J. Cook, A voyage towards the South Pole and round the world, 4th edn, 1784Google Scholar
  9. A. Stewart, Medical discipline; or rules, and regulations for the more effectual preservation of health on board the honourable East India Company’s ships, 1798.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    See, for example, J. Pringle, Observations on diseases in the army, 1752.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Surgeon Archibald Dalziel’s evidence, in S. Lambert (ed.). House of Commons Sessional Papers of the eighteenth century, Wilmington, 1975, vol. 68, 33.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    See Oliver MacDonagh, The Inspector General: Sir Jeremiah Titzpatrick and the politics of social reform, 1783–1802, London, 1981, 267–87.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    See R. Haines and R. Shlomowitz, ‘Explaining the Mortality Decline in the eighteenth-century British Slave Trade’, Economic History Review, LIII:2, 2000, 262–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    See medical texts cited above, and C. Lloyd (ed.), The health of seamen, Navy Records Society, London, 1965, 2–6; 132–135; 214–216.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    For experimentation with various citrus see T. Aubrey, The sea-surgeon, London, 1729, 64.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Quoted in S. Behrendt, “Crew mortality in the transatlantic slave trade in the eighteenth century”, Slavery & Abolition, 18, 1997, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 23.
    See J. Pringle, Observations on the diseases of the army, London, 1752, 133, for plans and drawingsGoogle Scholar
  18. but A. Falconbridge, in An account of the slave trade on the coast of Africa, London, 1788, 24, describes ventilators on slave ships and the consequences of their closure during storms.Google Scholar
  19. 24.
    Pringle emphasised that Cook’s sanitation and hygiene regime was merely following good practice; W. Renwick, in An enquiry into the nature and causes, London, 1792, 37–43Google Scholar
  20. Solomon De Monchy (City Physician at Rotterdam) whose prize-winning An essay on the causes and cure of the usual diseases in voyages to the West Indies (1762)Google Scholar
  21. 26.
    John Clark, in Observations on the diseases in long voyages to hot countries, London, 1784, 281, tests the work of McBride (on malt infusion for scurvy), and refers to knowledge of methods used by the Danish navy, 333Google Scholar
  22. James Clark (MD, FRSE, Fellow of the College of Physicians, Edinburgh), in A treatise on the yellow fever as it appeared in Dominica in the years 1793-4-5-6, London, 1797, 20, 161, includes numerous references to other texts. Clark published a number of papers in the Edinburgh Medical Commentaries seriesGoogle Scholar
  23. A. Elliot, in The seamen’s medical advocate, London, 1789, 236–41, argues with a number of published surgeons, esp. on the subject of slaves, crew, and yellow fever.Google Scholar
  24. See C. McLean, Suggestions for the prevention and mitigation of epidemic and pestilential diseases, London, 1817, v. Lind’s An essay on the most effectual means demonstrates an enthusiastic exchange of ideas with contemporaries.Google Scholar
  25. 27.
    M.C. Buer, Health, wealth, and population in the early days of the industrial revolution, London, 1926, reprinted, 1968, 5–6.Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    See, for example, H. Gavin, Sanitary ramblings, London, 1848, 93, 68–9, 89, passim. Gavin’s alarming analysis of slum conditions pre-empted Mearns’s famous The bitter cry of outcast London by 35 years.Google Scholar
  27. See also Wohl, Endangered Lives: Public Health in Victorian Britain, Methuen, London, 1983, 4–5Google Scholar
  28. See numerous references to Pringle, Lind, and Blane, in M.W. Flinn (ed.), Report on the sanitary condition of the labouring population of Gt. Britain by Edwin Chadwick, 1842, Edinburgh, 1965Google Scholar
  29. John Howard’s influential State of prisons, London, 1784, joined canonical texts mentioned above by Pringle, Lind, Blane, and Trotter all of whom published widely.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    C. Bateson, The convict ships, 1787–1868, Glasgow, 1969, 38, 44.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    C. Lawrence, ‘Disciplining disease: scurvy, the navy, and imperial expansion, 1750–1825’, in D.P. Miller and P.H. Reill (eds), Visions of Empire: voyages, botany, and representations of nature, Cambridge, 1996, 85.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R.M. Acheson, ‘The origins, content and early development of the curriculum in state medicine and public health, 1856–95’, in S. Farrow (ed.), The Public Health Challenge, Hutchinson, London, 1987, 19–36.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    S.R. Johannson, ‘Food for thought: rhetoric and reality in modern mortality history’. Historical Methods, 27, 1994, 113.Google Scholar
  34. 43.
    For a demonstration of theory succeeding at the expense of practical achievement, see M. Ramsey, ‘Public health in France’, in D. Porter (ed.), The History of Public Health and the Modern State, Rodopi, Amsterdam, 1994, 35–6, 69, 73, 82, 85.Google Scholar
  35. 45.
    N. Williams, ‘The reporting and classification of causes of death in mid-nineteenth-century England: The example of Sheffield’, Historical Methods, 29: 2, Spring, 1996, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 68.
    Surgeon Edward Strutt’s journal on the Thomas Arbuthnot, 1849–50, and an anonymous article from an unnamed source, which is a published account of Strutt’s journal, filed with the Freer Family Papers, Mss 8352, 8345, Box 913/5, La Trobe collection. State Library of Victoria.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robin Haines 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin Haines

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations