Advertisement

Trade-offs in Monetary Policy

  • Milton Friedman
  • David Laidler
Chapter

Abstract

In 1958, A. W. Phillips came up with an empirical negative relation between the rate of inflation and the level of unemployment, quickly christened the Phillips curve (Phillips, 1958). Phillips himself did not present the curve as a policy tool, but less than two years later Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow published a celebrated article in the American Economic Review (1960) in which they did. Given the long period for which the Phillips curve appeared to hold in Britain, Samuelson and Solow concluded that it could be treated as a long-run structural equation which provided the missing equation that the then conventional Keynesian system needed. They treated it as a menu from which the monetary authorities could choose. By tolerating higher inflation they could experience lower average unemployment and vice versa.

Keywords

Monetary Policy Central Bank Policy Rule Phillips Curve Inflation Target 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Friedman, Milton (2006). “Tradeoffs in Monetary Policy.” Paper prepared for David Laidler’s Festschrift.Google Scholar
  2. Laidler, David (1992). Letter to John B. Taylor, 22 December 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Laidler, David (1993). “Price Stability and the Monetary Order.” In Kumihari Shigehara, ed., Price Stabilization in the 1990s. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Laidler, David (1997). “The Emergence of the Phillips Curve as a Policy Menu.” In B. Curtis Eaton and R.G Harris, eds., Trade Technology and Economics: Essays in Honour of Richard G. Lipsey. Cheltenham, UK and Brrokfield, US: Edward Elgar pp. 88–106.Google Scholar
  5. Laidler, David (2002). “Phillips in Retrospect.” In W.J. Samuels and J.E. Biddle, eds., Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology. Amsterdam: JAI Press, pp. 223–235.Google Scholar
  6. Leeson, Robert, ed. (2000). A. W. H. Phillips Collected Works in Contemporary Perspective. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Taylor, John B. (1979). “Estimation and Control of a Macroeconomic Model with Rational Expectations.” Econometrica 47:5 (September), 1267–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Taylor, John B. (1993). “Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, pp. 195–214, North Holland.Google Scholar

References

  1. Crow, J. (2002). Making Money: An Insider’s Perspective on Finance, Politics and Canada’s Central Bank. Toronto: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Fisher, I. (1920). Stabilizing the Dollar. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Friedman, M. (1953). “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–34.Google Scholar
  4. Friedman, M. (1956). “The Quantity Theory of Money, a Restatement.” In M. Friedman, ed., Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
  5. Friedman, M. (1957). A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton: Princeton University Press for the NBER.Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, M. (1960). A Program for Monetary Stability. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, M. (1968). “The Role of Monetary Policy.” American Economic Review 68 (March), 1–18.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, H. G. (1968). “Problems of Efficiency in Monetary Management.” Journal of Political Economy 76 (September/October), 971–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Laidler, D. (1972). “The Current Inflation — Explanations and Policies,” as reprinted (1999) in Money and Macroeconomics, the Selected Essays of David Laidler. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 85–101.Google Scholar
  10. Laidler, D. (1997). “The Emergence of the Phillips Curve as a Policy Menu,” as reprinted (2004) with additions, in Macroeconomics in Retrospect, The Selected Essays of David Laidler. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 354–371.Google Scholar
  11. Leeson, R. (1997). “The Political Economy of the Inflation Unemployment Trade-Off”. History of Political Economy 29 (spring), 117–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lipsey, R. G. (1965). “Structural and Deficient Demand Unemployment Reconsidered.” In A. M. Ross, ed., Employment Policy and the Labour Market. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 191–209.Google Scholar
  13. Phelps, E. S. (1967). “Phillips Curves, Expectations of Inflation, and Optimal Unemployment Over Time.” Economica NS 34 (August), 254–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Phillips, A. W. (1958). “The Relationship between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom 1861–1957.” Economica NS 25 (November), 283–299.Google Scholar
  15. Reuber, G. L. (1962). “The Objectives of Monetary Policy.” Working paper prepared for the Royal Commission on Banking and Finance (The Porter Commission), Ottawa.Google Scholar
  16. Reuber, G. L. (1964). “The Objectives of Canadian Monetary Policy, 1949–1961: Empirical Trade-Offs and the Reaction Function of the Authorities.” Journal of Political Economy 72 (February), 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Samuelson, P. A. and R. Solow (1960). “Analytic Aspects of Anti-inflation Policy.” American Economic Review 60 (May, papers and proceedings), 177–194.Google Scholar
  18. Simons, H. C. (1936). “Rule versus Authorities in Monetary Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 44 (February), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sumner, M. (1976). “European Monetary Union and the Control of Europe’s Inflation Rate.” In J. M. Parkin and G. Zis, eds., Inflation in the World Economy. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 97–112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Milton Friedman and David Laidler 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milton Friedman
  • David Laidler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations