Skip to main content

Spaces of Contestation: The Governance of Industry’s Environmental Performance in Durban, South Africa

  • Chapter
Corporate Social Responsibility and Regulatory Governance

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 588 Accesses

Abstract

Through liberalization and globalization, transnational corporations (TNCs) are arguably the most important actors in the global economy. In the last two decades there has been a move towards TNC and host country cooperation and industry self-regulation.1 Civil society opposition, however, has emerged at multiple scales, concerned that there cannot be corporate responsibility without accountability.2 While the case can be made for increased recognition of TNCs’ responsibilities towards the countries in which they operate, how TNCs are governed in developing countries is a relatively understudied area. This chapter seeks to contribute to this area of inquiry by exploring how industry’s performance in the field of environmental health has evolved in a South African context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acutt, Nicola J., Perspectives on Corporate Responsibility: The South African Experience with Voluntary Initiatives (Norwich: University of East Anglia, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Acutt, Nicola J., Veronica Medina-Ross and Tim O’Riordan, ‘Perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the chemical sector: A comparative analysis of the Mexican and South African cases’, Natural Resources Forum, Vol. 28 (2004) 302–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, Neil W., Katrina Brown, Jenny Fairbrass, Andrew Jordan, Jouni Paavola, Sergio Rosendo and Gill Seyfang, ‘Governance for sustainability: Towards a “thick” analysis of environmental decisionmaking’, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 35(6), June (2003) 1095–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragon-Correa, J.A., ‘Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, No 5 (1998) 556–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, Karin, ‘Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance’, Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 3, No. 4 (2003) 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, Partima, ‘Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26 (2005) 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Clive, ‘Media transformation and new practices of citizenship: The example of environmental activism in post-apartheid Durban’, Transformation, Vol. 51 (2003) 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Clive and Dianne Scott, ‘Spaces of opposition: Activism and deliberation in post-apartheid environmental politics’, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 39 (2007) 2612–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barranco, José and Dominique Wisler, ‘Validity and systematicity of newspaper data in event analysis’, European Sociological Review, Vol. 15, No. 3 (1999) 301–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beinart, William, Twentieth-Century South Africa (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendell, Jem, Barricades and Boardrooms: A Contemporary History of the Corporate Accountability Movement, Programme on Technology, Business and Society, Paper No. 13 (Geneva: UNRISD, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Halina Szejnwald, Patrick Derr, Ortwin Renn and Allen L. White, Corporate Environmentalism in a Global Economy: Societal Values in International Technology Transfer (Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, Harriet, ‘Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks’, Political Geography, Vol. 24, No. 8 (2005) 875–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnie, Tony, ‘Disease stalks Merebank kids, study finds’, Independent Online (IOL), 28 February (2002). www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=ct20020228211611476W200895 (accessed on 15 December 2008).

  • Carnie, Tony, ‘Durban cancer cluster “not a fluke” — expert’, Independent Online (IOL), 10 September (2000). www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=ct20000910215512895S320884 (accessed on 15 December 2008).

  • Challenor, Martin, ‘Historic Durban environmental deal reached’, The Daily News,7 December (1999) 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, Siva, Processes That Led to a Dramatic Reduction in SO2 in the South Durban Basin, eThekwini Municipality (Durban: Pollution Control Support, eThekwini Health, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, Petra, ‘Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, No. 5 (2004) 747–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, Petra and Glenn Taylor, ‘Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37 (2006) 863–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cock, Jacklyn, Connecting the Red, Brown and Green: The Environmental Justice Movement in South Africa (Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Centre for Civil Society, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cock, Jacklyn and Eddie Koch, Going Green: People, Politics and the Environment in South Africa (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, Magali and Michael W. Toffel, ‘Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework’, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 13 (2004) 209–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul and Walter W. Powell, ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’. In Walter W. Powell and Paul DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • DME (Department of Minerals and Energy, Republic of South Africa), White Paper on the Energy Policy of the Republic of South Africa, December (Pretoria: Department of Minerals and Energy, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, Jennifer, Andrew Martin, John D. McCarthy and Sarah A. Soule, ‘The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 30 (2004) 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckerberg, Katarina and Marko Joas, ‘Multi-level environmental governance: A concept under stress?’, Local Environment, Vol. 9(5) (2004) 405–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engen, Engen Sustainability Report (Cape Town: Engen Ltd., 2007a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen, A History of Success (2007b). www.engen.co.za (accessed on 27 September 2007).

  • Engen, Engen Limited Sustainability Report 2006 (Cape Town: Engen Ltd., 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen, Engen Limited Sustainability Report 2005 (Cape Town: Engen Ltd., 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen, Engen Petroleum Limited Sustainability Report 2004 (Cape Town: Engen Petroleum Ltd., 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatah, Sonya, ‘The environment’s rich dad, poor dad scenario’, Business Day, 14 August (2002). www.businessday.co.za/Articles/TarkArticle.aspx?ID=584572 (accessed on 16 September 2008).

  • FoEI (Friends of the Earth International), Corporate Campaigns: Case Study on Shell (2006). www.foe.co.uk/campaigns/corporates/case_studies/shell/index.html (accessed on 26 March 2006).

  • FoEI (Friends of the Earth International), Shell Fenceline Communities: Shell CEO Must Deliver on His Promises, Press Release, 8 December (2005). www.corribsos.com/index.php?id=493 (accessed on 15 December 2008).

  • FoEI (Friends of the Earth International), Towards Binding Corporate Accountability (2002). www.foei.org/corporates/towards.html (accessed on 14 March 2006).

  • Garcia-Johnson, Ronie, Exporting Environmentalism: U.S. Multinational Chemical Corporations in Brazil and Mexico (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • GEAR (Growth, Employment and Redistribution), Growth, Employment and Redistribution: A Macroeconomic Strategy (Pretoria: Department of Finance, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasbergen, P., Co-operative Environmental Governance: Public-Private Agreements as a Policy Strategy (Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic, 1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldson, Andy and Rory Sullivan, ‘Corporate environmentalism: Tracing the links between policies and performance using corporate reports and public registers’, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 16, Nos I-II (2007) 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groundwork, Groundwork website (2006). www.groundwork.org.za/default.asp (accessed on 20 March 2007).

  • Groundwork, Press Release: Communities Attend Royal Dutch Shell’s AGs in London/The Hague and Raise Their Concerns (2003). www.groundwork.org.za/Press%20Releases/pr_shell_agm.htm (accessed on 3 January 2007).

  • Hajer, Maarten A., The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, Ralph and Nicola Acutt, ‘How should civil society (and the government) respond to “corporate social responsibility”? A critique of business motivations and the potential of partnerships’, Development Southern Africa, Vol. 20, No. 2 (2003) 255–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Andrew J., ‘Linking organizational and field-level analyses’, Organization & Environment, Vol. 14, No. 2 (2001) 133–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Andrew J., ‘Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry’, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 4 (1999) 351–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Andrew J. and Marc J. Ventresca, Organizations, Policy and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, Rupert, J. Skea and Bob Whelan, Clean and Competitive? MotivatingEnvironmental Performance in Industry (London: Earthscan, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Idemudia, Uwafiokun, Corporate Partnerships and Community Development in the Nigerian Oil Industry, Programme on Markets, Business and Regulation, Paper No. 2 (Geneva: UNRISD, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilinitch, A.Y., N.S. Soderstrom and T.E. Thomas, ‘Measuring corporate environmental performance’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 17 (1998) 383–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, Farhana, ‘Greenpeace activists storm refinery’, Independent Online (IOL), 4 September (2002). www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=ct20020904125554950G652384 (accessed on 15 December 2008).

  • Kagan, R.A., N. Gunningham and D. Thornton, ‘Explaining corporate environmental performance: How does regulation matter?’, Law & Society Review, Vol. 37, No. 1 (2003) 51–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, AndrewA. and Michael J. Lenox, ‘Industryself-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program]’, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 43, No.4 (2000) 698–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, Tatiana and Kendall Roth, ‘Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1 (2002) 215–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, Tatiana and Srilata Zaheer, ‘Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 1 (1999) 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lents, James M. and Nick Nikkila, South African Air Quality Related Findings and Recommendations (Rancho Cucamonga, CA: Global Sustainable Systems Research/GSSR, 2000). www.rmef.co.za/home/server/air_quality/lents_report/lent_report_air_quality.html (accessed on 15 December 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, David L. and Peter Newell, The Business of Global Environmental Governance (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, David L. and Peter Newell, ‘Business strategy and international environmental governance: Toward a neo-Gramscian synthesis’, Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2002) 84–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litfin, Karent T., Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, Peter, ‘Corporate accountability in South Africa: The role of community mobilizing in environmental governance’, International Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 3 (2005) 619–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marais, Hein, South Africa Limits to Change: The Political Economy of Transition (Cape Town: UCT Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Michael, The New Accountability: Environmental Responsibility across Borders (London: Earthscan, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbendi. South Africa: Oil and Gas Overview (2007). www.mbendi.co.za/indy/oilg/af/sa/p0005.htm (accessed on 17 February 2007).

  • Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan, ‘Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony’, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 2 (1977) 340–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBI (National Business Initiative), National Business Initiative website (2008). www.nbi.org.za (accessed on 26 March 2008).

  • Nhlapo, Phumi, ‘Forumslings mudatstateonindustrialclean-upplan’, SundayTribune, 29 July (2001) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nurick, Robert and Victoria Johnson, ‘Toward community based indicators for monitoring quality of life and the impact of industry in south Durban’, Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 10, No. 1 (1998) 233–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OGJ (Oil & Gas Journal), ‘Worldwide refining survey’, Vol. 101, No. 49 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, D., Community-Based Regulation: Balancing Development and Environment in Vietnam (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. Stern, S. Sonich and E. Weber (eds), The Drama of the Commons (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, Richard, ‘Criticism absurd and unfounded’, Daily News, 29 January (2002) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, Zarina, ‘Rethinking sustainable development in the post-apartheid reconstruction of South African cities’, Local Environment, Vol. 5, No. 4 (2000) 383–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek, Bobby, ‘Sapref: What about accountability?’, Daily News, 8 January (2002) 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, Richard, ‘Globalizing corporate environmentalism? Convergence and heterogeneity in Indian industry’, Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 42, Nos 3–4 (2007) 279–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PETRONAS (Petroliam Nasional Berhad), Petronas Group Sustainability Report 2007 (Kuala Lumpur: PETRONAS, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W. and Paul DiMaggio, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, Aseem, Greening the Firm: The Politics of Corporate Environmentalism (Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa, Constitution of the Republic of South Africa No. 108 of 1996 (Pretoria: Republic of South Africa, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa, National Treasury, National Budget 2007: National Medium Term Expenditure Estimates — Environmental Affairs and Tourism (Pretoria: National Treasury, 2007). www.treasury.gov.za/documents/national%20budget/2007/ene/Default.aspx (accessed on 15 December 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Debra and Nicci Diederichs, ‘Durban’s local Agenda 21 programme: Tackling sustainable development in a post-apartheid city’, Environment & Urbanization, Vol. 14, No. 1 (2002) 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, Philip M. and Jitendra V. Singh, ‘Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 2 (1991) 340–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, Michael V. and Paul A. Fouts, ‘A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability’, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3 (1997) 534–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SA DEAT (South Africa Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism), South Durban Basin Multi-Point Plan: Case Study Report (Pretoria: DEAT, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • SA DEAT (South Africa Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism), DEAT Strategic Plan: 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2010 (Pretoria: DEAT, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • SA DEAT (South Africa Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism), 10 Year Review: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (Pretoria: DEAT, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAPIA (South African Petroleum Industry Association), SAPIA website (2007). www.sapia.org.za/index.htm (accessed on 15 September 2007).

  • SAPIA (South African Petroleum Industry Association), SAPIA Annual Report 2005 (Cape Town: SAPIA, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAPIA (South African Petroleum Industry Association), SAPIA Annual Report 1996 (Cape Town: SAPIA, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAPREF (South African Petroleum Refineries), SAPREF website (2007). www.sapref.com/profile.htm (accessed on 1 January 2007).

  • SAPREF (South African Petroleum Refineries), Sustainability in Focus (Durban: SAPREF, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAPREF (South African Petroleum Refineries), Sustainability in Focus (Durban: SAPREF, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAPREF (South African Petroleum Refineries), Towards Sustainability 2004 (Durban: SAPREF, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. Richard, Institutions and Organizations (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • SDCEA-DN (South Durban Community Environmental Alliance), Comparison of Refineries in Denmark and South Durban in an Environmental and Societal Context: A 2002 Snapshot (South Durban: SDCEA-DN, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Sanjay and Harrie Vredenburg, ‘Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19 (1998) 729–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shell, Responsible Energy: The Shell Sustainability Report 2007 (London: Royal Dutch Shell plc, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell, Shell’s Approach to Interacting with Communities (2006a). www.shell.com (accessed on 26 March 2006).

  • Shell, Shell’s Approach to Reporting (2006b). www.shell.com (accessed on 26 March 2006).

  • Shell, 2002 Social Performance Review: SAPREF Refinery, Durban, South Africa (Durban: SAPREF, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Mark, ‘Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 (1995) 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Task Team, Possible Reforms to the Fiscal Regime Applicable to Windfall Profits in South Africa’s Liquid Fuel Energy Sector, with Particular Reference to the Synthetic Fuel Industry: A Discussion Document for Public Comment, report by the Task Team appointed by the Minister of Finance, Republic of South Africa, Pretoria, 20 July (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International, Promoting Revenue Transparency (Berlin: Transparency International, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), South Africa Human Development Report 2003 (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, Peter, The Greening of Business in Developing Countries: Rhetoric, Reality and Prospects (London: Zed Books, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, Peter, Business Responsibility for Sustainable Development, Occasional Paper No. 2 (Geneva: UNRISD, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westney, Eleanor D. ‘Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation’. In Sumantra Ghoshal and Eleanor D. Westney (eds), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, David, Heike Fabig and Richard Boele, ‘Paradoxes and dilemmas for stakeholder responsive firms in the extractive sector: Lessons from the case of Shell and the Ogoni’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 39 (2002) 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, D., C. Root and S. Peek, ‘Contesting the urban industrial environment in South Durban in a period of democratisation and globalisation’. In Bill Freund and Vishnu Padayachee (eds), (D)urban Vortex: South African City in Transition (Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 UNRISD

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Alstine, J. (2010). Spaces of Contestation: The Governance of Industry’s Environmental Performance in Durban, South Africa. In: Utting, P., Marques, J.C. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and Regulatory Governance. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246966_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics