Advertisement

The Time Provisions

  • Eugenia Caracciolo di Torella
  • Annick Masselot
Chapter
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

Having explored the role of the leave provisions in the previous chapter, this chapter focuses on flexibility and its implications for the reconciliation discourse. The term ‘flexibility’ was initially employed to describe working hours over and above normal ones.383 Today the term has a more general connotation and indicates any job which does not conform to the standard 9-to-5 full-time work pattern and includes, for example, part-time work and fixed-term contracts.384 Employees who are not performing open-ended and/or full-time contracts are often referred to as ‘atypical workers’. Thus, for the purposes of this chapter, ‘flexibility’, ‘flexible’ and ‘atypical working arrangements’ are used interchangeably.

Keywords

Family Life Employment Relationship European Foundation Framework Agreement Lisbon Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 383.
    K. Borg, ‘Family Life and Flexible Working Hours’, in S. Carlsen and J. Larsen (eds). The Equality Dilemma (Copenhagen: The Danish Equal Status Council, 1993), 67–78.Google Scholar
  2. 384.
    H. Collins, ‘The Right to Flexibility’ in J. Conaghan and K. Rittich, Labour Law, Work, and Family (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 99–124Google Scholar
  3. I. La Valle, S. Arthur, C. Millward, J. Scott, and M. Clayden, Happy Families — Atypical Work and its Influence on Family Life (Bristol: The Policy Press and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2002).Google Scholar
  4. 385.
    H. Collins, ‘Regulating the Employment Relation for Competitiveness’, Industrial Law Journal, 30 (2001), 17–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 387.
    See generally J. Fudge and R. Owens (eds). Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy: The Challenge to Legal Norms (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
  6. 388.
    J. Fudge and R. Owens (eds). Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy: The Challenge to Legal Norms (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006), p. 11Google Scholar
  7. G. Rogers and J. Rogers (eds), Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulations: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe (Brussels: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1989).Google Scholar
  8. 391.
    J. Rubery, D. Grimshaw, and H. Figueiredo, ‘How to Close the Gender Pay Gap in Europe: Towards the Gender Mainstreaming of Pay Policy’, Industrial Relations Journal, 36(3) (2005), 184–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 398.
    G. James, The Legal Regulation of Pregnancy and Parenting in the Labour Market (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009).Google Scholar
  10. 399.
    S. Berns, Women Going Backwards: Law and Change in a Family Unfriendly Society (Alderhot: Ashgate, 2002).Google Scholar
  11. 400.
    Ibid; J. Williams, Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to do about it (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
  12. C. McGlynn, ‘Work Family and Parenthood: The European Union Agenda’, in J. Conaghan, R. Fischl, and K. Klare (eds). Labour Law in an Era of Globalization: Transformations, Practices and Possibilities (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
  13. 401.
    S. McBride, Paradigm shift: Globalization and the Canadian State (Halifax: Fernwood, 2001), p. 21.Google Scholar
  14. 402.
    OECD, Employment Outlook (Paris: OECD, 2000).Google Scholar
  15. 405.
    G. Standing, ‘Global Féminisation through Flexible Labor: A Theme Revisited’, World Development, 27 (1999), 583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 407.
    ILO, Global Employment Trends for Women (Geneva: International Labour Office, 2004).Google Scholar
  17. L. Craig, Contemporary Motherhood: The Impact of Children on Adult Time (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar
  18. J. Gershuny and J. Robinson, ‘Historical Changes in the Household Division of Labor’ in F. Ackerman, N. R. Goodwin, L. Dougherty, and K. Gallagher (eds). The Changing Nature of Work (Washington, DC: Island Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  19. 408.
    P. Paoli and D. Merllié, Third European Survey on Working Conditions 2000 (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, 2001).Google Scholar
  20. 409.
    J. Rubery and R. Tading, ‘Britain’, in J. Rubery (ed.), Women and Recession (London: Routledge, 1988).Google Scholar
  21. 410.
    J. Atkinson, Flexibility, Uncertainty and Manpower Management (Brighton: Institute of Manpower Studies, 1984).Google Scholar
  22. 411.
    D. Perrons, ‘Flexible Working Patterns and Equal Opportunities in the European Union: Conflict or Compatibility?’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 6(4) (1999), 391–418Google Scholar
  23. D. Perrons, ‘The New Economy and the Work-Life Balance: A Case Study of the New Media Sector in Brighton and Hove’, Gender, Work and Organisation, 10 (2005), 65–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Bäck-Wiklund and L. Plantin, ‘The Workplace as an Arena for Negotiating the Work-Family Boundary: A Case Study of Two Swedish Social Services Agencies’, in C. Crompton, S. Lewis, and C. Lyonette (eds), Women, Men, Work and Family (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillian, 2007), 171–189.Google Scholar
  25. 412.
    J. Rubery and R. Tarling, ‘Britain’, in J. Rubery (ed.), Women and Recession (London: Routledge, 1988)Google Scholar
  26. 425.
    K. Borg, ‘Family Life and Flexible Working Hours?’, in S. Carlsen and J. Larsen (eds). The Equality Dilemma (Copenhagen: The Danish Equal Status Council, 1993), 67–78Google Scholar
  27. 427.
    European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Combining Family and Full-Time Work (Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 2007).Google Scholar
  28. 428.
    OECD, Babies and Bosses — Reconciling Work and family Life (Paris: OECD, 2007)Google Scholar
  29. E. Dermott, ‘What’s Parenthood Got to Do with it?: Men’s Hours of Paid Work’, The British Journal of Sociology, 57(4) (2006), 619–634.Google Scholar
  30. 429.
    J. O’Reilly and C. Fagan Part-Time Prospects: An International Comparison of Part-Time Work in Europe, North America and the Pacific Rim (London: Routledge, 1998)Google Scholar
  31. I. Bleijenbergh, J. de Bruijn, and J. Bussemaker, ‘European Social Citizenship and Gender: The Part-Time Work Directive’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 10 (2004), 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 430.
    Equal Opportunities Commission, Facts about Men and Women in Great Britain (London: Equal Opportunity Commission, 2004)Google Scholar
  33. S. Fredman, ‘The Broken Promise of Flexicurity’, Industrial Law Journal, 33(4) (2004), 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 431.
    L. Lausten, and K. Sjorup, Hvad kvinder og mœnd bruger tiden til — om tidsmessig ligestilling idanske familier [Men and women’s time use — on gender equal time use in Danish families], ISF-rapport 08 (Copenhagen, Denmark: Social Research Institute, 2003).Google Scholar
  35. 433.
    J. Lewis, ‘Work Family Reconciliation and the Law: Intrusion or Empowerment?’, in S. Lewis and J. Lewis (eds), The Work-Family Challenge (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1996), 34–47.Google Scholar
  36. 396.
    S. Fredman, ‘Labour Law in Flux: The Changing Composition of the Workplace’, Industrial Law Journal, 26 (1997), 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 397.
    A. Supiot et al., Beyond Employment: Change in Work and the Future of Labour Law in Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  38. 590.
    J. Shaw, ‘Citizenship of the Union: Towards Post-National Membership’, in Academy of European Law (ed.). Collected Course of the Academy of European Law, vol. VI, Book I (De Hague: Kluwer International Law, 1998), 237–387.Google Scholar
  39. 600.
    Case C-200/02 Zhu and Chen [2004] ECR 1–9925; See further H. Stalford, The Relevance of EU Citizenship to Children’, in A. Invernizzi and J. Williams (eds), Children and Citizenship (London: Sage, 2008).Google Scholar
  40. 619.
    Case C-63/91 Jackson and Cresswell v. Chief Adjudication Officer [1992] ECR 1–4737 at paragraph 30; See also T. Hervey and J. Shaw, ‘Women, Work and Care: Women’s Dual Role and Double Burden in EC Sex Equality Law’, Journal of European Social Policy, 8(1) (1998), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 620.
    J. Sohrab, Sexing the Benefit: Women, Social Security and Financial Independence in EC Sex Equality Law (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996).Google Scholar
  42. 621.
    M. Cousins, ‘Equal Treatment and Social Security’, European Law Review, 19(2) (1994), p. 123.Google Scholar
  43. 664.
    OECD, Long-Term Care for Older People (Paris: OECD, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 665.
    H. Engel and F. Kessler, ‘Long-Term Care in Europe’, MISSOC-INFO, 2 (2006), p. 5.Google Scholar
  45. 668.
    For a concise but excellent overview see L. Hantrais, Social Policy in the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave-McMillian, 2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eugenia Caracciolo di Torella and Annick Masselot 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugenia Caracciolo di Torella
    • 1
  • Annick Masselot
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.University of LeicesterUK
  2. 2.University of LeedsUK
  3. 3.University of CanterburyNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations