Abstract
In evicting the Maasai from the Rift Valley and Laikipia, the British clearly perpetrated a great injustice that has repercussions to this day.2 After all, Britain made a solemn contract over land and broke its terms just seven years later, under the pretext that the Maasai themselves had asked to be relocated. The numbers of people who died during the first phase of the second move (up to August 1911) cannot be proved and may be negligible; the injustice goes deeper and wider than that. The northern sections lost the greater part of their land, and the wide range of habitat necessary for transhumant pastoralism. The extended Southern Reserve was an inferior substitute for the northern territory. Its western extension lacked sufficient permanent water sources, accessible forests and drought refuges, while disease vectors were more prevalent.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The time has come for the Maasai community to pause and review, reflect and evaluate their total losses during the horrific removal by the British Imperial Regime from their lands … It would not to be improper or imprudent for the Maasai to demand that they get back part of their pasture lands or be paid compensation … .1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Conclusion
I am thinking in particular of the Hodgson-edited collection Rethinking Pastoralism in Africa: Gender, Culture and the Myth of the Patriarchal Pastoralist (Oxford: James Currey, 2000).
John W. Cell also noted this ‘fundamental ambivalence’, By Kenya Possessed: The Correspondence of Norman Leys and J. H. Oldham, 1918–1926 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), pp. 10–11.
Norman Leys, Kenya (London: The Hogarth Press, 1924), p. 392.
James Belich, Making Peoples: A History of the New Zealanders from Polynesian Settlement to the End of the Nineteenth Century (Auckland and London: Allen Lane, 1996), p. 195.
Vincent O’Malley, ‘Treaty-making in colonial New Zealand’, New Zealand Journal of History, Vol. 33, 2 (1999), 139.
Copyright information
© 2006 Lotte Hughes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, L. (2006). Conclusion. In: Moving the Maasai. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246638_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246638_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54548-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-24663-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)