Abstract
In the second half of the eighteenth century the City of London was served by two summary justice rooms: the Guildhall justicing room situated within the old Guildhall building on Basinghall Street, and the Mansion House court at the lord mayor’s residence at the junction of Cornhill and Poultry. Each operated at the geographical and administrative heart of the City. The centrality of these courts was crucial, for it was their accessibility to a range of different users, and their close association to the governance of the City, that made them such a vital element in the lives of Londoners. The City’s population had little distance to travel to bring their grievances before a magistrate, a luxury not afforded to a large proportion of people living in rural areas. The very size of London — that is the greater metropolis and not just the City — meant that the level of crime and social tension was higher than elsewhere while toleration of disorder was lower, making the role of the City courts particularly important to our understanding of summary process during this period.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. Innes, ‘Managing the Metropolis: Social Problems and Their Control c1660–1830’, in P. Clark and R. Gillespie (eds), Two Capitals: London and Dublin 1500–1840 (Oxford, 2001 ), p. 64.
See M.D. George, London Life in the Eighteenth Century (Middlesex 1925, 1966 ), p. 16.
G. Cumberlege, The Corporation of London (London, 1950 ).
M. Finn, The Character of Credit. Personal Debt in English Culture, 1740–1914, (Cambridge, 2003 ), pp. 197–199.
J. Wade, A Treatise of the Police and Crimes of the Metropolis (London, 1829), pp. 344–345.
See E. Crittall (ed.), Justicing Notebook of William Hunt entry 445 and Paley (ed.), Justice, entry 287.
Burn, Justice; W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws ofEngland volumes 1–4 (Oxford, 1765).
G. Rudé, Hanoverian London, 1714–1808 (London, 1971), pp. 122–123.
D. Andrew, ‘Aldermen and Big Bourgeoisie of London Reconsidered’, Social History, 6,3 (October, 1981), p. 361.
P.D.G. Thomas, John Sawbridge (1732–1795) Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (ODNB) ref:odnb/24750.
N. Rogers, ‘Money, Land and Lineage: The Big Bourgeoisie of Hanoverian London’, Social History, 4, 3 (October, 1979), p. 442 and Rudé, Hanoverian London, p. 123.
T. Clayton, John Boydell (1720–1804) ref:odnb/3120 ODNB.
R.G. Wilson, Harvey Christian Combe (1752–1818) ref:odnb/50464.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Drew D. Gray
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gray, D.D. (2009). Locating the Summary Courts. In: Crime, Prosecution and Social Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246164_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246164_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30159-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-24616-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)