Advertisement

‘Mother Radcliff’: Ann Radcliffe and the Female Gothic

  • Robert Miles

Abstract

In his essay on Walpole Walter Scott proves once again that he is the master of the even-handed insult. He acknowledges that ‘Mrs. Radcliffe’ was ‘a name not to be mentioned without the high respect due to genius’, but then observes that she adopted the wrong solution to the problem posed by the supernatural in fiction. Walpole ‘details supernatural incidents as they would have been readily believed and received in the eleventh and twelfth century’. Radcliffe rejected this simple expedient in favour of explanation: ‘the precaution of relieving our spirits from the influence of supposed supernatural terror, seems as unnecessary in a work of professed fiction, as that of the prudent Bottom’ reassuring the ladies that he is not really a lion.2 Even as he praises Radcliffe, Scott eroded the foundations of her literary reputation. When he comes to write about her, for his Lives of the Novelists (1821–1824), he returns to his task. He simultaneously praises her as the founder of her own ‘class or school’ (she is the ‘first poetess of romantic fiction’ [103]), and then defends her against a charge that he admits ought not to be levelled against her: that she should be tarred with the same critical brush that blackened ‘the crowd of copyists who came forward in imitation of Mrs. Radcliffe’, assuming ‘her magic wand, without the power … ‘ (111). If the tar sticks, it is because of her incautious wish to make like Bottom, and reassure her readers ‘that all the circumstances of her narrative, however mysterious, and apparently superhuman, were to be accounted for on natural principles (115).

Keywords

Public Sphere Cultural Capital Critical Work Woman Writer Magic Wand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    John Keats, Letters Of John Keats: A Selection, Robert Gittings, ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970), 214.Google Scholar
  2. 8.
    Norman Holland and Leona Sherman, ‘Gothic Possibilities’, New Literary History 8/2 (1977), 279–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 9.
    Robert Miles, Gothic Writing 1750–1820: A Genealogy, 2nd edition (Manchester: Manchester Press, 2002), 46–7.Google Scholar
  4. 11.
    Marshall Brown, The Gothic Text (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005), 31.Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    William Hazlitt, Lectures on the English Comic Writers (London, New York and Toronto: Oxford University Press [1819], 1907), 165.Google Scholar
  6. 18.
    Nathan Drake, Literary Hours, or Sketches Critical and Narrative, 2nd edition, 2 vols (New York: Garland [1800], 1970), 359.Google Scholar
  7. 23.
    Mary Poovey, ‘Ideology and the Mysteries of Udolpho’, Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 21 (1979), 307–30.Google Scholar
  8. 26.
    Anna Laetitia Barbauld, Anna Letitia Barbauld: Selected Poetry and Prose, Elizabeth Kraft and William McCarthy, eds (Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview, 2002), 215–16.Google Scholar
  9. 27.
    J. C. Maxwell, William Wordsworth: The Prelude: A Parallel Text (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971).Google Scholar
  10. 29.
    Ann Radcliffe, The Italian, Robert Miles, ed. (Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, [1794] 2000), 33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert Miles 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Miles
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishUniversity of VictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations