Skip to main content

Animal Rights and Moral Theories

  • Chapter
Animal Rights

Abstract

The contemporary philosophical arm of the animal rights or liberation movement effectively began in 1975 with Peter Singer’s book Animal Liberation.1 In this work, and in subsequent development of its ideas,2 Singer argues that the moral theory known as utilitarianism can be used to justify and defend the moral claims of non-human animals. According to utilitarianism, a morally good action is one which promotes or produces the greatest amount of pleasure, happiness, or satisfaction of desires, and Singer argues, quite forcibly, that such promotion requires abandoning such practices as animal husbandry, and experimentation upon animals for scientific or commercial purposes. Singer’s case for animal liberation, then, is anchored in his adoption of a utilitarian moral theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Peter Singer, Animal Liberation (New York: The New York Review of Books 1975). Reprinted by Thorsons (1991). All page references are to the latter.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peter Singer, Practical Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980); ‘Utilitarianism and vegetarianism’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, 8 (1980); ‘Animals and the value of life’, in Matters of Life and Death, ed. T. Regan (New York: Random House 1980); ‘Killing humans and killing animals’, Inquiry 22 (1979); ‘All animals are equal’, Philosophical Exchange 1, 5 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tom Regan, The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: The University of California Press 1984). Reprinted by Routledge (1988). All page references are to the latter.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The following have also been influential: Stephen Clark, The Moral Status of Animals (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1977);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mary Midgeley, Animals and Why They Matter (Harmondsworth: Penguin 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. F. Sapontzis, Morals, Reasons, and Animals (Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1987);

    Google Scholar 

  7. James Rachels, Created From Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1990);

    Google Scholar 

  8. David deGrazia, Taking Animals Seriously (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosalind Hursthouse, On Virtue Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press); Michael Slote, Morals From Motives (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. For a development of virtue ethical thinking particularly relevant to the case of animals, see Rosalind Hursthouse, Ethics, Humans and Other Animals (New York: Routledge 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peter Carruthers The Animals Issue: Moral Theory In Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1971). However, as I shall argue in Chapter 6, Rawls’s version of contractarianism is vitiated by several crucial unexpurgated Hobbesian assumptions.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Mark Rowlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowlands, M. (2009). Animal Rights and Moral Theories. In: Animal Rights. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245112_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics