‘I don’t care if it does me good, I like it’: Childhood, Health and Enjoyment in British Women’s Magazine Food Advertising

Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)


Advertisements included within women’s magazines have often used portrayals of families, and of children, in the attempt to persuade readers to purchase the products depicted. As part of such attempts at persuasion, and consistent with advertising’s more general tendency to put products forward as problem-solving devices (Dyer 1982:168–169; Cook 2001:49), particular versions of the relationship between childhood, food, and consumption are advanced in such material. For instance, chil dren may be constructed as particularly ‘faddy’ in their food preferences, and resistant or uncooperative when it comes to eating healthily. Thus, advertisements for food products have often featured the ‘voices’ of such children, endorsing a product — evidence that it transcends ‘faddiness’ or circumvents a more generalised resistance to eating healthily.


Expositional Text Sensory Taste Food Advertising Specific Nutrition Direct Claim 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Burridge, J. D. (2008). ‘The dilemma of frugality and consumption in British women’s magazines 1940–1955’. Social Semiotics 18(3):389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charles, N. & Kerr, M. (1988). Women, Food and Families. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, D. T. (2003). ‘Agency, children’s consumer culture and the fetal subject: Historical trajectories, contemporary connections’. Consumption, Markets and Culture 6(2):115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook, G. (2001). The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. DeVault, M. (1991). Feeding the Family: The Social Organisation of Caring as Gendered Work. London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dixon, J. & Banwell, C. (2004). ‘Heading the table: Parenting and the junior consumer’. British Food Journal 106(3):181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dyer, G. (1982). Advertising as Communication. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards, D. (2000). ‘Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4):347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gelperowic, R. & Beharrell, B. (1994). ‘Healthy food products for children: packaging and mother’s purchase decisions’. British Food Journal 96(11):4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Herrick, C. (2007). ‘Risky bodies: Public health, social marketing and the government of obesity’. Geoforum 38(1):90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill, H. & Tilley, J. (2002). ‘Packaging of children’s breakfast cereal: Manufacturers versus children’. British Food Journal 104(9):766–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. James, A. (1982). ‘Confections, concoctions and conceptions’, in Waites, B., Bennett, T. & Martin, G. (eds), Popular Culture: Past and Present (pp. 294–307). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. James, A. (1990). ‘The good, the bad and the delicious: The role of confectionery in British society’. The Sociological Review 38(4):666–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James, A., Jenks, C. & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Jeffries, L. (2007). Textual Construction of the Female Body: A Critical Discourse Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, N. (2001). Childhood and Society. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Livingstone, S. (2005). ‘Assessing the research base for the policy debate over the effects of food advertising to children’. International Journal of Advertising 24(3):273–296.Google Scholar
  20. Machin, D. (2007). Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  21. Marshall, D., O’Donohoe, S. & Kline, S. (2007). ‘Families, food, and pester power: Beyond the blame game?’ Journal of Consumer Behaviour 6(4):164–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mayall, B. (2002). Towards a Sociology for Childhood: Thinking from Children’s Lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. McDermott, L., O’Sullivan, T., Stead, M. & Hastings, G. (2006). ‘International food advertising, pester power and its effects’. International Journal of Advertising 25(4):513–540.Google Scholar
  24. Nicholls, A. J. & Cullen, P. (2004). ‘The child-parent purchase relationship: ‘Pester power’ human rights and retail ethics’. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 11(2):75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parkin, K. (2006). Food Is Love: Advertising and Gender Roles in Modern America. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Turner, J. T., Kelly, J. & McKenna, K. (2006). ‘Food for thought: Parents’ perspectives of child influence’. British Food Journal 108(3):181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, (trans.) Matejka, L. & Titunik, I. R. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Warde, A. (1997). Consumption, Food and Taste: Culinary Antinomies and Commodity Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Wiggins, S. & Potter, J. (2003). ‘Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs item and subjective vs objective constructions in everyday food assessments’. British Journal of Social Psychology 42(4):513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Joseph Burridge 2009

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations