Venus Approaching Mars? The European Union’s Approaches to Democracy Promotion in Comparative Perspective

  • Tanja A. Börzel
  • Thomas Risse
Part of the Governance and Limited Statehood Series book series (GLS)


With the end of the Cold War, democracy promotion has been mainstreamed into the development strategies of international organizations such as the UN or the World Bank, but also of individual Western states such as the United States, or the Federal Republic of Germany. The EU is no exception. In fact, the EU has been among the first of any Western state or international organization to write human rights, democracy and the rule of war into its agreements with external partners. The Lomé IV agreement of 1989 between the EU and the so-called ACP countries (African, Caribbean and Pacific Group, mostly former colonies of Great Britain, France and Belgium) was the first multilateral development agreement to include political conditionality. Ten years later, in 1999, the EU adopted the European Initiative for Development and Human Rights (EIDHR) as a comprehensive strategy ‘in support of democratization, the strengthening of the rule of law and the development of a pluralist and democratic civil society’ (EIDHR 976/1999, preamble).


Foreign Policy Good Governance Political Dialogue Security Sector Reform European Neighbourhood Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abellan, M. (2007), ‘Database of ESDP Missions’. CFSP Forum 4, 6: 17–22.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, D. and L. de Propris (2004), ‘A Bridge to Phare? EU Pre-Accession Aid and Capacity-Building in the Candidate Countries’. Journal of Common Market Studies 42, 1: 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, D. and C. Thomas (2004), ‘Zwischen Sanktionierung und Dialog: Die Durchsetzung von Good Governance in der Entwicklungspartnerschaft von EU und AKP’ in F. U. Pappi, E. Riedel and R. Vaubel (eds), Institutionalisierung internationaler Verhandlungssysteme, Frankfurt a/M: Campus.Google Scholar
  4. Bicchi, F. (2006a), ‘“Our Size Fits All”: Normative Power Europe and the Mediterranean’. Journal of European Public Policy 13, 2: 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bicchi, F. (2006b), ‘Want Funding? Don’t Mention Islam: EU Democracy Promotion in the Mediterranean’. CFSP Forum 4, 2: 10–12.Google Scholar
  6. Bicchi, F. (2007), European Foreign Policy Making towards the Mediterranean, New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. Börzel, T. A., Yasemin Pamuk and Andreas Stahn (2007), ‘Good Governance in the European Union’. Berliner Arbeitspapiere zur Europäischen Integration, Center of European Studies, Freie Universität Berlin 07, 5.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, R. (2000), The Postmodern State and the World Order, London: Demos and the Foreign Policy Centre.Google Scholar
  9. Dembinski, M. (2007), ‘Europe and the UNIFIL II Mission: Stumbling into the Conflict Zone of the Middle East’. CFSP Forum 5, 1: 1–4.Google Scholar
  10. Duchêne, F. (1972), ‘Europe’s Role in World Peace’ in R. Mayne (ed.), Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, London: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission (1995), On the Inclusion of Respect for Democratic Principles and Human Rights in Agreements between the Community and Third Countries.Google Scholar
  12. European Council (2003), ‘A secure Europe in a better world — European Security Strategy’, Brussels: European Institute for Security Studies, 12 December.Google Scholar
  13. Gegout, C. (2007), ‘The EU and Security in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2006: Unfinished Business’. CFSP Forum 4, 6: 5–9.Google Scholar
  14. Gheciu, A. (2005),’ security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the “New Europe”’. International Organization 59, 4: 973–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gomez, R. (2003), Negotiating the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership. Strategic Action in EU Foreign Policy? Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Gourlay, C. (2004), ‘European Union Procedures and Resources for Crisis Management’. International Peacekeeping 11, 3: 404–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grabbe, H. (2006), The EU’s Transformative Power — Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Gross, E. (2006), ‘The EU in Afghanistan: What Role for EU Conflict Prevention and Crisis Management Policies?’ CFSP Forum 4, 4: 11–14.Google Scholar
  19. Harnisch, S. and H. Maull (2001), ‘Introduction’ in S. Harnisch and H. Maull (eds), Germany as a Civilian Power? The foreign policy of the Berlin Republic, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hazelzet, H. (2001), ‘Carrots or Sticks? EU and US Sanctions in Reaction to Human Rights Violations’. PhD dissertation, European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
  21. Henderson, K. (1999),’ slovakia and the Democratic Criteria for EU Accession’ in K. Henderson (ed.), Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hodson, D. and I. Maher (2001), ‘The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance: The Case of Soft Economic Policy Co-ordination’. Journal of Common Market Studies 39, 4: 719–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holland, M. (2002), The European Union and the Third World, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  24. Howorth, J. (2007), Security and Defence Policy in the European Union, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  25. Jünemann, A. and M. Knodt (eds) (2007), Externe Demokratieförderung durch die Europäische Union European External Democracy Promotion, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  26. Kagan, R. (2003), Of Paradise and Power. America and Europe in the New World Order, New York: A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  27. Kelley, J. G. (2004), Ethnic Politics in Europe. The Power of Norms and Incentives, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kelley, J. G. (2006), ‘New Wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Political Reforms through the New European Neighbourhood Policy’. Journal of Common Market Studies 44, 1: 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirste, K. and Hanns W. M. (1996), ‘Zivilmacht und Rollentheorie’ Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 3, 2: 283–312.Google Scholar
  30. Kochenov, D. (2004), ‘Behind the Copenhagen facade. The Meaning and Structure of the Copenhagen Political Criteria of Democracy and the Rule of Law’. European Integration On Line Papers 8, 10.Google Scholar
  31. Krasner, S. D. (1999), Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Magen, A. (2006), ‘The Shadow of Enlargement: Can the European Union Neighbourhood Policy Achieve Compliance?’ Columbia Journal of European Law 12, 495–538.Google Scholar
  33. Manners, I. (2002), ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 40, 2: 235–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manners, I. (2006), ‘Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads’. Journal of European Public Policy 13, 2: 182–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Manners, I. and R. G. Whitman (2003), ‘The “Difference Engine”: Constructing and Representing the International Identity of the European Union’. Journal of European Public Policy 10, 3: 380–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maresceau, M. (2003), ‘Pre-Accession’ in M. Cremona (ed.), The Enlargement of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Maull, H. (2002), ‘Die “Zivilmacht Europa” bleibt Projekt. Zur Debatte um Kagan, Asmus/Pollack und das Strategiedokument NSS 2002’. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, 12: 1467–78.Google Scholar
  38. O’Brennan,J. (2008), EU and the Western Balkans: Stabilization and Europeanization Through Enlargement, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Pevehouse, J. C. (2005), Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Santos, C. (2006), ‘Human Rights Clauses: Unraveling the Pattern of Implementation’. PhD dissertation, European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
  41. Scheipers, S. and D. Sicurelli (2007), ‘Normative Power Europe: A Credible Utopia?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 45, 2: 435–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schimmelfennig, F. (2003), The EU, NATO, and the Integration of Europe. Rules and Rhetoric, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schimmelfennig, F. and U. Sedelmeier (eds) (2005), The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sedelmeier, U. (2005), Constructing the Path to Eastern Enlargement: The Uneven Policy Impact of EU Identity, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sjursen, H. (2006), ‘What Kind of Power?’ Journal of European Public Policy 13, 2: 169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, K. E. (2000), ‘The End of Civilian Power EU: A Welcome Demise or Cause for Concern?’ International Spectator 35, 2: 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stokke, O. (1995), ‘Aid and Political Conditionality: Core Issues and State of the Art’ in O. Stokke (ed.), Aid and Political Conditionality, London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  48. Vachudova, M. A. (2003),’ strategies for Democratization and European Integration in the Balkans’ in M. Cremona (ed.), The Enlargement of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Vachudova, M. A. (2005), Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warkotsch, A. (2006), ‘The Rhetoric-Reality Gap in the EU’s Democracy Promotion in Central Asia’ CFSP Forum 4, 6: 14–16.Google Scholar
  51. Youngs, R. (2004), ‘Normative Dynamics and Strategic Interests in the EU’s External Identity’. Journal of Common Market Studies 42, 2: 415–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Youngs, R. (2008), ‘Is European Democracy Promotion on the Wane?’ CEPS Working Document May 2008, 292: Brussels. 61–92Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tanja A. Börzel and Thomas Risse 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanja A. Börzel
    • 1
  • Thomas Risse
    • 2
  1. 1.Otto-Suhr-Institut for Political ScienceFreie Universität BerlinGermany
  2. 2.Universidad IberoamericanaMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations