Skip to main content
  • 109 Accesses

Abstract

In his book on Leibniz, Russell offered a sustained critique of the traditional notion of substance. Russell came to think that the traditional understanding of substance was grounded upon an erroneous logical theory and that it was empirically inadequate. The overall conclusion of Russell’s argument is that some main ideas traditionally associated with the metaphysics of substance are of no use in metaphysics and have to be abandoned. Since Whitehead appears to have been persuaded by Russell’s arguments, this explains why he will try to develop a system of revisionary metaphysics in which the notion of substance as the underling holder of properties is replaced by the notion of the actual entity as an occasion of experience organically related to all other occasions. What remains to be explained is why Whitehead could have come to see in Leibniz’s metaphysics an anticipation of his own philosophy – going even so far as to claim that the philosophy of organism ‘is a theory of monads’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Pierfrancesco Basile

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Basile, P. (2009). The Relevance of Leibniz: Ward’s Theory of Monads. In: Leibniz, Whitehead and the Metaphysics of Causation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230242197_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics