Skip to main content

Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption

  • Chapter
Corruption, Development and Institutional Design

Part of the book series: This is IEA Conference ((IEA))

Abstract

Elections serve two functions in representative democracies. First, they select political actors who enact public policies in the light of constituents’ preferences. Second, they permit citizens to hold their representatives accountable and to punish them if they enrich themselves in corrupt or self-serving ways. In other words, elections provide both incentives for politicians to enact certain kinds of policies and constraints on politicians’ malfeasance. In this chapter, we focus on the second of these two functions and investigate how different electoral systems constrain corrupt rent-seeking, holding constant other political, economic and social factors.

This chapter is a shortened version of Kunicová and Rose-Ackerman (2005). Readers are referred to that paper for more extensive citations to the literature and more details on the results reported here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beck, T., G. Clarke, A. Groff, P. Keefer, and P. Walsh (1999) ‘New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions’, World Bank (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and P. Zoido-Lobaton (1999) ‘Aggregating Governance Indicators’, World Bank Working Paper 2195, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunicová, J. (2005) ‘Corruption: Another Peril of Presidentialism’, California Institute of Technology (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunicová, J. and S. Rose-Ackerman (2005) ‘Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1567–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (1998) ‘The Transparency International Corruption Perception Index: 4th edition’, http://www.uni-goettingen.de/~uwvw.

  • Lancaster, T. D. and G. Montinola (2001) ‘Comparative Political Corruption: Issues of Operationalization and Measurement’, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S. (1995) ‘Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 198–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and G. E. Tabellini (2000) Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and G. E. Tabellini (2003) The Economic Effects of Constitutions (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., G. E. Tabellini, and R Trebbi (2003) ‘Electoral Rules and Corruption’, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 958–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999) Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, J., A. Gaviria, U. Panizza, and E. Stein (2003) ‘Political Particularism Around the World’, World Bank Economic Review, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 133–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, M. S. (1998) ‘The Inverse Relationship Between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politicians’ Constitutional Choices’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, M. S. and Carey, J. M. (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. (2000) ‘The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 399–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2001) World Development Indicators (Washington, DC: The World Bank) CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kunicová, J., Rose-Ackerman, S. (2009). Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption. In: Kornai, J., Mátyás, L., Roland, G. (eds) Corruption, Development and Institutional Design. This is IEA Conference. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230242173_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics