Abstract
In the past decade or so most European nations have increased enrolments in higher education and encouraged universal access, decentralised control from the ministries of education to the universities, and considered ways to stabilise or even reduce public investment as a proportion of the total cost of higher education (Enders and de Weert 2004b; Gornitza and Maassen 2000; Huisman et al. 2002; Musselin 2004; Teixeira et al. 2004). In Finland, for example, recent policies have led to a contractual ‘partnership’ where institutional leaders and the ministry agree on degree production goals and total financing. This policy shift has increased institutional autonomy in setting faculty workloads (Hölttä 1998). At the same time, the Bologna Process (Neave 2003) encourages student and faculty mobility, common credit and degree structures, and similar measures across European national boundaries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abraham, S. et al. (2002) 1999 National Survey of Postsecondary Faculty Methodology Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.
Alpert, D. (1985) ‘Performance and Paralysis: the Organizational Context of the American Research University’, Journal of Higher Education 56: 241–81.
Austin, A. (1992) ‘Supporting Junior Faculty through a Teaching Fellows Program’, in M. Sorcinelli and A. Austin (eds), Developing New and Junior Faculty, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 73–86.
Baldwin, R. and R. Blackburn (1981) ‘The Academic Career as a Developmental Process’, Journal of Higher Education 52: 598–614.
Becher, T. (1989) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Inquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Bess, J. (1978) ‘Anticipatory Socialization of Graduate Students’, Research in Higher Education 8: 289–317.
Blackburn, R. and J. Lawrence (1995) Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bok, D. (1992) ‘Reclaiming the Public Trust’, Change 24: 12–19.
Boyer, E. (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities for the Professoriate, Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2001) The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, 2000 Edition, Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Chronister, J., R. Baldwin and V. Conley (1997) Retirement and Other Departure Plans of Instructional Faculty and Staff in Higher Education Institutions, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Clark, B. (1987) The Academic Profession: National, Disciplinary, and Institutional Settings, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Colbeck, C. (2002) ‘State Policies to Improve Undergraduate Teaching: Administrator and Faculty Responses’, Journal of Higher Education 73: 3–25.
De Weert, E. (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace in the Netherlands’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 290–309.
Diamond, R. (1993) ‘Changing Priorities and the Faculty Reward System’, in R. Diamond and B. Adam (eds), Recognizing Faculty Work: Reward Systems for the Year 2000, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 5–12.
Enders, J. and U. Teichler (1997) ‘A Victim of their Own Success? Employment and Working Conditions of Academic Staff in Comparative Perspective’, Higher Education 34: 347–73.
Enders, J. and E. de Weert (2004a) The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW.
Enders, J. and E. de Weert (2004b) ‘The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe: Synopsis Report’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 11–31.
Fairweather, J. (1993) ‘Faculty Rewards Reconsidered: the Nature of Tradeoffs’, Change 25: 44–7.
Fairweather, J. (1996) Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Fairweather, J. (2002) ‘The Mythologies of Faculty Productivity: Implications for Institutional Policy and Decision Making’, Journal of Higher Education 73: 26–48.
Fairweather, J. and R. Rhoads (1995) ‘Teaching and the Faculty Role: Enhancing the Commitment to Instruction in American Colleges and Universities’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17: 179–94.
Feldman, K. (1987) ‘Research Productivity and Scholarly Accomplishment of College Teachers as Related to Instructional Effectiveness: a Review and Exploration’, Research in Higher Education 26: 227–98.
Fritzell, A. (2004) ‘Many Challenges Ahead for Sweden’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 415–38.
Fulton, O. and M. Trow (1974) ‘Research Activity in American Higher Education’, Sociology of Education 47: 29–73.
Gornitza, A. and P. Maassen (2000) ‘Hybrid Steering Approaches with Respect to European Higher Education’, Higher Education Policy 13: 267–85.
Hattie, J. and H. Marsh (1996) ‘The Relationship between Research and Teaching: a Meta-analysis’, Review of Educational Research 66: 507–42.
Hölttä, S. (1998) ‘The Funding of Universities in Finland: Towards Goal-Oriented Government Steering’, European Journal of Education 33: 55–63.
Hrabinska, M. (2004) ‘The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 373–94.
Huisman, J., P. Maassen and G. Neave (2001) Higher Education and the Nation State, Oxford: Elsevier/Pergamon.
Huisman, J., E. de Weert and J. Bartelse (2002) ‘Academic Careers from a European Perspective: the Declining Desirability of the Faculty Position’, Journal of Higher Education 73: 141–60.
Jones, D. and P. Ewell (1993) ‘The Effect of State Policy on Undergraduate Education’, Denver: Education Commission of the States and National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
Killeavy, M. (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 231–42.
Kwiek, M. (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 332–48.
Kyvik, S. and J. Smeby (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 310–31.
Leslie, D. (2002) ‘Resolving the Dispute: Teaching is Academe’s Core Value’, Journal of Higher Education 73: 49–73.
Musselin, C. (2004) ‘Towards a European Academic Labour Market? Some Lessons Drawn from Empirical Studies on Academic Mobility’, Higher Education 48: 55–78.
Nagy, P. (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 204–30.
Neave, G. (2003) ‘On Scholars, Hippopotami and von Humboldt’, Higher Education Policy 16: 135–40.
Soares, V. and A. Trindade (2004) ‘The Attractiveness of the Academic Career’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 349–72.
Stamelo, Y. and Papadiamantaki, Y. (2004) ‘The Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 183–203.
Svaton, O. and A. Vlk (2004) ‘Academic Staff: the Extraordinary Species of Homo Academicus’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 72–93.
Svinichi, M., A. Hagen and D. Meyer (1996) ‘How Research on Teaching Strengthens Instruction’, in R. Menges and M. Weimer (eds), Teaching on Solid Ground: Using Scholarship to Improve Teaching, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 257–88.
Tavernier, K. (2004) ‘The Academic Profession in a Belgian Context’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 52–71.
Teixeira, P., B. Jongbloed, D. Dill and A. Amaral (2004) Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? New York: Springer.
Tomusk, V. (2004) ‘Higher Education Reform and the Academic Profession’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 94–114.
Trapenciere, L., L. Jermolajeva and I. Karkliņa (2004) ‘Academic Personnel: Working Conditions and Career Opportunities’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 264–89.
Välimaa, J. (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace in Finland’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 115–40.
Weimer, M. (1990) Improving College Teaching: Strategies for Developing Instructional Effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 James Fairweather
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fairweather, J. (2009). Work Allocation and Rewards in Shaping Academic Work. In: Enders, J., de Weert, E. (eds) The Changing Face of Academic Life. Issues in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230242166_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230242166_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35602-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-24216-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)