Skip to main content

Work Allocation and Rewards in Shaping Academic Work

  • Chapter
The Changing Face of Academic Life

Part of the book series: Issues in Higher Education ((IHIGHER))

Abstract

In the past decade or so most European nations have increased enrolments in higher education and encouraged universal access, decentralised control from the ministries of education to the universities, and considered ways to stabilise or even reduce public investment as a proportion of the total cost of higher education (Enders and de Weert 2004b; Gornitza and Maassen 2000; Huisman et al. 2002; Musselin 2004; Teixeira et al. 2004). In Finland, for example, recent policies have led to a contractual ‘partnership’ where institutional leaders and the ministry agree on degree production goals and total financing. This policy shift has increased institutional autonomy in setting faculty workloads (Hölttä 1998). At the same time, the Bologna Process (Neave 2003) encourages student and faculty mobility, common credit and degree structures, and similar measures across European national boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, S. et al. (2002) 1999 National Survey of Postsecondary Faculty Methodology Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpert, D. (1985) ‘Performance and Paralysis: the Organizational Context of the American Research University’, Journal of Higher Education 56: 241–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. (1992) ‘Supporting Junior Faculty through a Teaching Fellows Program’, in M. Sorcinelli and A. Austin (eds), Developing New and Junior Faculty, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and R. Blackburn (1981) ‘The Academic Career as a Developmental Process’, Journal of Higher Education 52: 598–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1989) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Inquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bess, J. (1978) ‘Anticipatory Socialization of Graduate Students’, Research in Higher Education 8: 289–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. and J. Lawrence (1995) Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (1992) ‘Reclaiming the Public Trust’, Change 24: 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities for the Professoriate, Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2001) The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, 2000 Edition, Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronister, J., R. Baldwin and V. Conley (1997) Retirement and Other Departure Plans of Instructional Faculty and Staff in Higher Education Institutions, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1987) The Academic Profession: National, Disciplinary, and Institutional Settings, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbeck, C. (2002) ‘State Policies to Improve Undergraduate Teaching: Administrator and Faculty Responses’, Journal of Higher Education 73: 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Weert, E. (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace in the Netherlands’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 290–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R. (1993) ‘Changing Priorities and the Faculty Reward System’, in R. Diamond and B. Adam (eds), Recognizing Faculty Work: Reward Systems for the Year 2000, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. and U. Teichler (1997) ‘A Victim of their Own Success? Employment and Working Conditions of Academic Staff in Comparative Perspective’, Higher Education 34: 347–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. and E. de Weert (2004a) The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. and E. de Weert (2004b) ‘The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe: Synopsis Report’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. (1993) ‘Faculty Rewards Reconsidered: the Nature of Tradeoffs’, Change 25: 44–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. (1996) Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. (2002) ‘The Mythologies of Faculty Productivity: Implications for Institutional Policy and Decision Making’, Journal of Higher Education 73: 26–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. and R. Rhoads (1995) ‘Teaching and the Faculty Role: Enhancing the Commitment to Instruction in American Colleges and Universities’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17: 179–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. (1987) ‘Research Productivity and Scholarly Accomplishment of College Teachers as Related to Instructional Effectiveness: a Review and Exploration’, Research in Higher Education 26: 227–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzell, A. (2004) ‘Many Challenges Ahead for Sweden’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 415–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, O. and M. Trow (1974) ‘Research Activity in American Higher Education’, Sociology of Education 47: 29–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitza, A. and P. Maassen (2000) ‘Hybrid Steering Approaches with Respect to European Higher Education’, Higher Education Policy 13: 267–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. and H. Marsh (1996) ‘The Relationship between Research and Teaching: a Meta-analysis’, Review of Educational Research 66: 507–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölttä, S. (1998) ‘The Funding of Universities in Finland: Towards Goal-Oriented Government Steering’, European Journal of Education 33: 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrabinska, M. (2004) ‘The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 373–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., P. Maassen and G. Neave (2001) Higher Education and the Nation State, Oxford: Elsevier/Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., E. de Weert and J. Bartelse (2002) ‘Academic Careers from a European Perspective: the Declining Desirability of the Faculty Position’, Journal of Higher Education 73: 141–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. and P. Ewell (1993) ‘The Effect of State Policy on Undergraduate Education’, Denver: Education Commission of the States and National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killeavy, M. (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 231–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek, M. (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 332–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S. and J. Smeby (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 310–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, D. (2002) ‘Resolving the Dispute: Teaching is Academe’s Core Value’, Journal of Higher Education 73: 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2004) ‘Towards a European Academic Labour Market? Some Lessons Drawn from Empirical Studies on Academic Mobility’, Higher Education 48: 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, P. (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 204–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2003) ‘On Scholars, Hippopotami and von Humboldt’, Higher Education Policy 16: 135–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares, V. and A. Trindade (2004) ‘The Attractiveness of the Academic Career’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 349–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamelo, Y. and Papadiamantaki, Y. (2004) ‘The Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svaton, O. and A. Vlk (2004) ‘Academic Staff: the Extraordinary Species of Homo Academicus’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svinichi, M., A. Hagen and D. Meyer (1996) ‘How Research on Teaching Strengthens Instruction’, in R. Menges and M. Weimer (eds), Teaching on Solid Ground: Using Scholarship to Improve Teaching, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 257–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavernier, K. (2004) ‘The Academic Profession in a Belgian Context’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 52–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, P., B. Jongbloed, D. Dill and A. Amaral (2004) Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomusk, V. (2004) ‘Higher Education Reform and the Academic Profession’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 94–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapenciere, L., L. Jermolajeva and I. Karkliņa (2004) ‘Academic Personnel: Working Conditions and Career Opportunities’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 264–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Välimaa, J. (2004) ‘The Academic Workplace in Finland’, in J. Enders and E. de Weert (eds), The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt am Main: GEW, pp. 115–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, M. (1990) Improving College Teaching: Strategies for Developing Instructional Effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 James Fairweather

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fairweather, J. (2009). Work Allocation and Rewards in Shaping Academic Work. In: Enders, J., de Weert, E. (eds) The Changing Face of Academic Life. Issues in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230242166_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics