Abstract
This book addressed a crucial yet currently undertheorized research question: what makes the EU viable? Such a task was shown to matter not only because of the succession of crises, resulting at times in inanition, that the European integration project has endured in the past six decades. Understanding viability is also essential in order to judge the merits of the current plethora of schemes for reforming the EU order. The Janus-faced nature of the viability problem was reflected in the twofold analytical concern with, firstly, explaining the historical evolution of successful integration before, secondly, considering how certain transformative changes would affect this compound political system. The former was seen to follow, in the conceptual vocabulary of this study, a path of dynamic equilibrium; the second, a process theorized as voluntary centralization, was revealed as fraught with danger.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Andrew Glencross
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glencross, A. (2009). Conclusion: Implications for EU Studies and the Debate over the Future of Integration. In: What Makes the EU Viable?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230240896_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230240896_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30951-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-24089-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)