Skip to main content

The Future Evolution of the EU Compound Polity: The Obstacles to Voluntary Centralization

  • Chapter
What Makes the EU Viable?
  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

This penultimate chapter has three aims. Firstly, it questions whether the hitherto successful maintenance of a dynamic equilibrium is self-reinforcing or liable to potential future disruption. In particular, this necessitates an examination of what might threaten the ability to maintain a compromise between supranational and intergovernmental visions of integration. Here the obvious threat is the exacerbation of the two longest-standing cleavages between member states: the face-off between partisans of a free market Europe and advocates of a ‘social Europe’, based on market regulation, and the conflict between backers of NATO and Europeanists calling for security and foreign policy independence.

Any federal arrangement likely to have long-term survival prospects is predicated on representation as a necessary condition.

Heinz Eulau (1974: 154)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Andrew Glencross

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glencross, A. (2009). The Future Evolution of the EU Compound Polity: The Obstacles to Voluntary Centralization. In: What Makes the EU Viable?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230240896_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics