Skip to main content

Cultural Influence on Consumer Motivations: A Dynamic View

  • Chapter
Beyond Hofstede

Abstract

An understanding of the differences in the norms and values that predominate across societies can provide important theoretical and practical insights to those interested in the international environment. Recognizing this opportunity, researchers have identified various dichotomous value dimensions by administering extensive survey questionnaires to respondents from several different countries, then analyzing the responses to isolate those value characteristics that presumably differentiate one society from another. Hofstede (1980) completed seminal work in this research domain, prompting similar large-scale efforts, including the Cross Cultural Connection’s study of 22 countries (Bond, 1987), the GLOBE study of 62 countries (House et al., 2004), and Shalom Schwartz’s study of 38 countries (Schwartz, 1994, 1999).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaker, J. & Lee, A. (2001) “I Seek Pleasures, We Avoid Pains: The Role of Self Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (June), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. & Maheswaran, D. (1997) “The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (December), 315–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. & Schmitt, B. (2001) “Culture-Dependent Assimilation and Differentiation of the Self,” Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 32 (September), 561–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983) The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., Bond, R. N., Lombardi, W., & Tota, M. E. (1986) “The Additive Nature of Chronic and Temporary Sources of Construct Accessibility,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 869–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., Lombardi, W., & Higgins, E. T. (1988) “Automaticity of Person-Situation Effects in Impression Formation: It’s Just a Matter of Time,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 599–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (1997) “The Automaticity of Everyday Life,” in R. S. Wyer, Jr. (ed.) Advances in Social Cognition, Vol. 10. Mahwah, NJ: Eribaum, 231–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benet-Martinez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. W. (2002) “Negotiating biculturalism,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33 (September), 492–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. (1987) “Chinese Values and the Search for Cultural-free Dimensions of Culture,” Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 18 (2), 143–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D. A. & Aaker, J. L. (2006a) “When Does Culture Matter?: Effects of Personal Knowledge on the Correction of Culture-based Judgments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (August), 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D. A. & Aaker, J. L. (2006b) “Bridging the Culture Chasm: Ensuring that Consumers are Healthy, Wealthy and Wise,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25 (1), 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D. A., Morris, M., & Simonson, I. (2000) “Reasons as Carriers of Culture: Dynamic vs. Dispositional Models of Cultural Influence on Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (2), 157–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D. A., Morris, M., & Simonson, I. (2005) “Cultural Chameleons: Biculturals, Conformity Motives, and Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (4), 351–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D. A. & Wyer, Jr., R. S. (2001) “Transitory Determinants of Values and Decisions: The Utility (or Non-utility) of Individualism-Collectivism in Understanding Cultural Differences,” Social Cognition, 19 (3), 198–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D. A. & Wyer, Jr., R. S. (2002) “The Effects of Group Membership on the Avoidance of Negative Outcomes: Implications for Social and Consumer Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (3), 400–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1990) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C.-Y. & Hong, Y.-Y. (2005) “Cultural Competence: Dynamic Processes,” in A. Elliot & C. Dweck (eds), Handbook of Motivation and Competence. New York: Guilford, 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrade, R. G. (1984) “Cultural meaning systems,” in R. A. Schweder & R. A. LeVine (eds) Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self and Emotion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 88–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawar, N. & Parker, P. (1994) “Marketing Universals: Consumers’ Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation As Signals of Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (April), 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R. (1996) “The Effect of Decision Strategy on Deciding to Defer Choice,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 265–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R. (1997) “Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999) “‘I’ value Freedom, but ‘We’ Value Relationships: Self-construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment,” Psychological Science, 10(4), 321–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. & Osborne, R. E. (1989) “Thinking Backward: Some Curable and Incurable Consequences of Cognitive Busyness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (December), 940–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S.-P. & Shavitt, S. (1994) “Persuasion and Culture: Advertising Appeals in Individualistic and Collectivistic Cultures,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30 (July), 326–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassin, R. R., Uleman, J. S. & Bargh, J. A. (2004) The New Unconscious. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. & Lehman, D. (1999) “Culture, Self-Discrepancies, and Self-Satisfaction,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 915–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002) “What’s Wrong with Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Subjective Likert Scales: The Reference-Group Problem,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M. & Kempen, H. J. G. (1998) “Moving Cultures: The Perilous Problems of Cultural Dichotomies in a Globalizing Society,” American Psychologist, 53 (October), 1111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1996) “Knowledge Activation: Accessibility, Applicability and Salience,” in E. T. Higgins & A. E. Kruglanski (eds), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. New York, NY: Guilford, 133–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997) “Beyond Pleasure and Pain,” American Psychologist, 55 (November), 1217–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1998) “Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle,” in M. P. Zanna (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 30, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. & King, G. A. (1981) “Accessibility of Social Constructs: Information Processing Consequences of Individual and Contextual Variability,” in N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (eds) Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 69–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D. Y. F. & Chiu, C. Y. (1994) “Component Ideas of Individualism, Collectivism, and Social Organization: An Application in the Study of Chinese Culture,” in U. Kim, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (eds) Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 137–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s Consequence: International Differences of Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London, UK: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y.-Y., Morris, M. Y., Chiu, C.-Y., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000) “Multicultural Minds: A Dynamic Constructivist Approach to Culture and Cognition,” American Psychologist, 55 (7), 709–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. W., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1991) “The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status-Quo Bias,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. &, Markus, H. (1999) “Deviance or Uniqueness, Harmony or Conformity,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (4), 785–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S., Snibbe, A. C., Markus, H. R., &, Suzuki, T. (2004) “Is There Any ‘Free’ Choice? Self and Dissonance in Two Cultures,” Psychological Science, 15 (8), 527–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau-Gesk, L. (2003) “Activating Culture Through Persuasion Appeals,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (3), 301–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., Aaker, J., & Gardner, W. (2000) “The Pleasures and Pains of Distinct Self-Construals: The Role of Interdependence in Regulatory Focus,” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78 (June), 1122–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leo, C., Bennett, R., & Härtel, C. (2005) “Cross-cultural Differences in Consumer Decision-making Styles,” Cross Cultural Management, 12 (3), 32–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S. &, Slovic, P. (2006) The Construction of Preference. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. (2007) Exotic Preferences: Behavioural Economics and Human Motivation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M., Zinkhan, G., & Harris, J. (1993) “Consumer Tipping: A Cross-country Study,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (December), 478–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. (1991) “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion and Motivation,” Psychological Review, 98, 224–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. (2004) “Models of Agency: Sociocultural Diversity in the Construction of Action,” in V. Murphy-Berman & J. J. Berman (eds) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-Cultural Differences in Perspectives on the Self Vol. 49. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W., Menon, T., & Ames, D. (2001) “Culturally Conferred Conceptions of Agency: A Key to Social Perception of Persons, Groups, and Other Actors,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 169–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977) “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes,” Psychological Review, 84 (May), 231–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., Wyer, R. S., & Colcombe, S. (2000) “Cultural Variation in the Use of Current Life Satisfaction to Predict the Future,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 434–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, A. M. (1994) “Theoretical and Empirical Examination,” in R. Malgady & O. Rodriquez (eds), Theoretical and Conceptual Issues in Hispanic Mental Health. Malabar, FL: Krieger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinney, J. S. (1996) “When We Talk about American Ethnic Groups, What Do We Mean?,” American Psychologist, 51, 918–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1999) “A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work,” Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48 (1), 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994) “Beyond Individualism-Collectivism: New Cultural Dimensions of Values,” in U. Kim, H. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (eds) Individualism & Collectivism: Theory, Method and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., ter Hofstede, E, & Wedel, M.(1999) “A Cross-National Investigation into the Individual and National Cultural Antecedents of Consumer Innovativeness,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I. (1989) “Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R. (1984) “Models of social inference processes,” Psychological Review, 91, 292–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R. (1990) “Content and Process Specificity in the Effects of Prior Experiences,” in T. Srull & R. S. Wyer (eds) Advances in Social Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srull, T. K. & Wyer, R. S. (1979) “The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information about Persons: Some Determinants and Implications,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995) Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watchravesringkan, K. & Yurchisin, J. (2007) “A Structural Analysis of value Orientations, Price Perceptions, and Ongoing Search Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Study of American and Korean Consumers,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31 (3), 272–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T., Hodges, S. D., & LaFleur, S. J. (1995) “Effects of Introspecting about Reasons: Inferring Attitudes from Accessible Thoughts,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (July), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. & Schooler, J. W. (1991) “Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (2), 181–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, Jr., R. S. & Srull, T. K. (1989) Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Donnel A. Briley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Briley, D.A. (2009). Cultural Influence on Consumer Motivations: A Dynamic View. In: Nakata, C. (eds) Beyond Hofstede. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230240834_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics