Skip to main content

Academic Writing in World Englishes: The Asian Context

  • Chapter
Global Englishes in Asian Contexts

Abstract

It is evident that children acquire language in the course of their overall development through infancy to pre-teen years unless there are physiological (e.g. total loss of hearing) or environmental causes (e.g. forced isolation of the child) that prevent such acquisition. However, the linguistic competence acquired in natural socio-cultural settings does not necessarily include literacy skills. These skills depend on socio-cultural traditions that include writing in addition to oral performances of various sorts, e.g. in the community (i.e. community meetings), religious events (reading and writing of scriptures, delivering sermons, etc.) and ritualistic acts (performing specific rites according to manuals of the tradition). Competence in writing is acquired with deliberate effort in institutional settings such as the family, the school, the monastery, or wherever. It involves instruction and, usually, practice over a long period of time, and the rate of success in achieving writing competence varies considerably within any given population. Each literate culture has its own conventions of writing, and it is instructive to look at these closely if one is interested in understanding the process of writing, the cultural context of the product, and the cultural value assigned to writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, R. 2006. ‘The Crafting of Scientific Meaning and Identity: Exploring the Performative Dimensions of Michael Faraday’s Texts.’ Perspectives on Science 14(1), 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aston, G. 1977. ‘Comprehending value: aspects of the structure of argumentative discourse’. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica ed Applicata 6, 465–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey. S. 2001. Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D. 1986. ‘Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings.’ Language 62, pp. 384–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craswell, G. 2004. Writing for Academic Success. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. M. 1967. ‘Epistemological methods in Indian philosophy.’ In Moore (1967b), pp. 118–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, B. and A. N. Singh. 1962. History of Hindu Mathematics. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, J. R. 1957. ‘A synopsis of linguistic theory.’ In F. R. Palmer (ed.) 1968. Selected papers of J. R. Firth, 1952–59. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, H. 1994. Listening to the World: Cultural Issues in Academic Writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Explorations in the Function of Language. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L. and B. Heasley. 2006. Study Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatim, M. 1991. ‘The pragmatics of argumentation in Arabic: The rise and fall of a text type.’ Text 11, 189–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimann, B. 1964. Facets of Indian thought. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel, E. (ed.) 1999. Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005. Research in Second Language Learning and Teaching. Ed. Eli Hinkel. Mahwa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E. R. 1967. ‘Epistemological methods in Chinese philosophy.’ In Moore (1967a), pp. 77–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. 1970. ‘On communicative competence.’ In Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds), Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 38–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, R. R. 1999. Academic Writing Course. London: Nelson/Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. E. 2004. Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, B. B. 1985. ‘Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle.’ In Randolph Quirk and Henry Widdowson (eds) English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1986. The Alchemy of English: The Spread, Functions and Models of Non-Native Englishes. London: Pergamon Press. [South Asian Edn by Oxford University Press, 1989]

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. ‘The Bilingual’s Creativity: Discoursal and Stylistic Strategies in Contact Literature.’ In Smith (1987). New York and London: Prentice-Hall. pp. 125–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (ed.) 1992. The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. (2nd edition)

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2005. Asian Englishes: Beyond the Canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, Y. 1983. ‘Linguistics and written discourse in particular languages: contrastive studies: English and Hindi.’ Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1982, 3, 50–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. ‘Cross-cultural texts, discourse strategies and discourse interpretation.’ In Larry E. Smith (1987), pp. 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. ‘Writers in Hindi and English.’ In Purves, A. C. (ed.) Contrastive Rhetoric: Theory and Case Studies. Written Communication Annual, vol. 3. London: Sage Publications, 109–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995a. ‘Contrastive rhetoric in world Englishes.’ English Today, 11, 21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995b. ‘Lexical exponents of cultural contact: Speech act verbs in Hindi-English dictionaries.’ In B. Kachru and H. Kahane (eds) Cultures, Ideologies, and the Dictionary: Studies in Honor of Ladislav Zgusta. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. pp. 261–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. ‘Kachru revisits contrasts.’ English Today, 12, 41–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997a. ‘Cultural meaning and contrastive rhetoric in English Education.’ World Englishes, 16(3), 337–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997b. ‘Culture and argumentative writing in world Englishes.’ In Smith and Forman (1997), pp. 48–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. ‘World Englishes and rhetoric across cultures.’ Asian Englishes: an International Journal of the Sociolinguistics of English in Asia/Pacific, Winter 2001, 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, Y. and C. L. Nelson. 2006. World Englishes in Asian Contexts. Hong Kong, Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamimura, T. and K. Oi. 1998. ‘Argumentative strategies in American and Japanese English.’ World Englishes, 17(3), 307–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katre, S. M. 1987. Astadhyayi of Panini: In Roman Transliteration. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummer, W. 1972. Aspects of a theory of argumentation. In E. Gulich and W. Raible (eds), Textsorten. Frankfurt, Germany: Anthenäum, pp. 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (ed.). 1967a. The Chinese Mind: Essentials of Chinese Philosophy and Culture. Honolulu, HI: The University Press of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967b. The Indian Mind: Essentials of Indian Philosophy and Culture. Honolulu, HI: The University Press of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967c. The Japanese Mind: Essentials of Japanese Philosophy and Culture. Honolulu, HI: The University Press of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugan, V. 2000. Tolkappiyam in English-Translation, with the Tamil Text, Transliteration in the Roman Script, Introduction, Glossary, and Illustrations. Chennai; Institute of Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, H. 1967. ‘Consciousness of the individual and the universal among the Japanese.’ In Moore (1967c). pp. 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshima, A. and A. Hogue. 2005. Writing Academic English. New York: Addison- Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandharipande, R. V. 1983. ‘Linguistics and written discourse in particular languages: contrastive studies: English and Marathi.’ Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (1982), 3, 118–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parret, H. 1987. Argumentation and narrativity. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds), Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline. Providence, RI: Foris Publications, pp. 165–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanthan, V. and D. Atkinson. 1999. ‘Some problematic “channels” in the teaching of critical thinking in current L1 composition textbooks: Implications for L2 student writers.’ Issues in Applied Linguistics 7, 225–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. L. (ed.) 1995. Composing Social Identity in Written Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1926. On Education, Especially in Early Childhood. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savignon, S. and M. Berns. 1984. Initiatives in Communicative Language Teaching. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. and M. Cole. 1981. The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 2005. The Argumentative Indian: Writing on Indian History, Culture and Identity. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, T. and P. K. Matsuda (eds) 2001. On Second Language Writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. E. (ed.) 1987. Discourse across Cultures: Strategies in World Englishes. London, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. E. and M. Forman. (eds) 1997. World Englishes 2000. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St Amant, K. 1999. ‘When culture and rhetoric contrast: Examining English as an international language of technical communication.’ IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication 42(4), 297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, P. 2001. ‘Assessing critical thinking in the writing of Japanese university students: Insights about assumptions and content familiarity.’ Written Communication 18(4), 506–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. M. 1981. ‘Aspects of article introductions.’ In Aston ESP Research Report No. 1, Language studies Unit. Birmingham, UK: University of Aston in Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. ‘A genre-based approach to language across the curriculum.’ In Makhan L. Tickoo (ed.) Language across the Curriculum, Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, pp. 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. Genre analysis — English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. M. and C. B. Feak. 1994. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: A Course for Non-native Speakers of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, A. 1995. ‘Analysis of newspaper editorials: A study of argumentative text structure.’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirkkonen-Condit, S. 1985. ‘Argumentative text structure and translation.’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uljin, J. M. 1996. ‘Translating the culture of technical documents: Some experimental evidence.’ In D. C. Andrews (ed.) International Dimensions of Technical Communication. Arlington: VA: STC, pp. 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. 1980. Macrostructure: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyas, B. S., B. N. Tiwari and R. N. Srivastava. 1972. hindii vyaakaraN aur racnaa. (Hindi grammar and composition). Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werlich, E. 1976. A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg, Germany: Quelle and Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Yamuna Kachru

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kachru, Y. (2009). Academic Writing in World Englishes: The Asian Context. In: Murata, K., Jenkins, J. (eds) Global Englishes in Asian Contexts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239531_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics