Abstract
It is evident that children acquire language in the course of their overall development through infancy to pre-teen years unless there are physiological (e.g. total loss of hearing) or environmental causes (e.g. forced isolation of the child) that prevent such acquisition. However, the linguistic competence acquired in natural socio-cultural settings does not necessarily include literacy skills. These skills depend on socio-cultural traditions that include writing in addition to oral performances of various sorts, e.g. in the community (i.e. community meetings), religious events (reading and writing of scriptures, delivering sermons, etc.) and ritualistic acts (performing specific rites according to manuals of the tradition). Competence in writing is acquired with deliberate effort in institutional settings such as the family, the school, the monastery, or wherever. It involves instruction and, usually, practice over a long period of time, and the rate of success in achieving writing competence varies considerably within any given population. Each literate culture has its own conventions of writing, and it is instructive to look at these closely if one is interested in understanding the process of writing, the cultural context of the product, and the cultural value assigned to writing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, R. 2006. ‘The Crafting of Scientific Meaning and Identity: Exploring the Performative Dimensions of Michael Faraday’s Texts.’ Perspectives on Science 14(1), 7–39.
Aston, G. 1977. ‘Comprehending value: aspects of the structure of argumentative discourse’. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica ed Applicata 6, 465–509.
Bailey. S. 2001. Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students. London and New York: Routledge.
Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
Biber, D. 1986. ‘Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings.’ Language 62, pp. 384–414.
Craswell, G. 2004. Writing for Academic Success. London: Sage Publications.
Datta, D. M. 1967. ‘Epistemological methods in Indian philosophy.’ In Moore (1967b), pp. 118–35.
Datta, B. and A. N. Singh. 1962. History of Hindu Mathematics. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
Firth, J. R. 1957. ‘A synopsis of linguistic theory.’ In F. R. Palmer (ed.) 1968. Selected papers of J. R. Firth, 1952–59. London: Longman.
Fox, H. 1994. Listening to the World: Cultural Issues in Academic Writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Explorations in the Function of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
Hamp-Lyons, L. and B. Heasley. 2006. Study Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hatim, M. 1991. ‘The pragmatics of argumentation in Arabic: The rise and fall of a text type.’ Text 11, 189–99.
Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heimann, B. 1964. Facets of Indian thought. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Hinkel, E. (ed.) 1999. Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Cambridge University Press.
—. 2005. Research in Second Language Learning and Teaching. Ed. Eli Hinkel. Mahwa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hughes, E. R. 1967. ‘Epistemological methods in Chinese philosophy.’ In Moore (1967a), pp. 77–103.
Hymes, D. 1970. ‘On communicative competence.’ In Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds), Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 38–71.
Jordan, R. R. 1999. Academic Writing Course. London: Nelson/Longman.
Joseph, J. E. 2004. Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kachru, B. B. 1985. ‘Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle.’ In Randolph Quirk and Henry Widdowson (eds) English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.
—. 1986. The Alchemy of English: The Spread, Functions and Models of Non-Native Englishes. London: Pergamon Press. [South Asian Edn by Oxford University Press, 1989]
—. 1987. ‘The Bilingual’s Creativity: Discoursal and Stylistic Strategies in Contact Literature.’ In Smith (1987). New York and London: Prentice-Hall. pp. 125–40.
—. (ed.) 1992. The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. (2nd edition)
—. 2005. Asian Englishes: Beyond the Canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Kachru, Y. 1983. ‘Linguistics and written discourse in particular languages: contrastive studies: English and Hindi.’ Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1982, 3, 50–77.
—. 1987. ‘Cross-cultural texts, discourse strategies and discourse interpretation.’ In Larry E. Smith (1987), pp. 87–100.
—. 1988. ‘Writers in Hindi and English.’ In Purves, A. C. (ed.) Contrastive Rhetoric: Theory and Case Studies. Written Communication Annual, vol. 3. London: Sage Publications, 109–37.
—. 1995a. ‘Contrastive rhetoric in world Englishes.’ English Today, 11, 21–31
—. 1995b. ‘Lexical exponents of cultural contact: Speech act verbs in Hindi-English dictionaries.’ In B. Kachru and H. Kahane (eds) Cultures, Ideologies, and the Dictionary: Studies in Honor of Ladislav Zgusta. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. pp. 261–74.
—. 1996. ‘Kachru revisits contrasts.’ English Today, 12, 41–4.
—. 1997a. ‘Cultural meaning and contrastive rhetoric in English Education.’ World Englishes, 16(3), 337–50.
—. 1997b. ‘Culture and argumentative writing in world Englishes.’ In Smith and Forman (1997), pp. 48–67.
—. 2001. ‘World Englishes and rhetoric across cultures.’ Asian Englishes: an International Journal of the Sociolinguistics of English in Asia/Pacific, Winter 2001, 54–71.
Kachru, Y. and C. L. Nelson. 2006. World Englishes in Asian Contexts. Hong Kong, Hong Kong University Press.
Kamimura, T. and K. Oi. 1998. ‘Argumentative strategies in American and Japanese English.’ World Englishes, 17(3), 307–23.
Katre, S. M. 1987. Astadhyayi of Panini: In Roman Transliteration. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Kummer, W. 1972. Aspects of a theory of argumentation. In E. Gulich and W. Raible (eds), Textsorten. Frankfurt, Germany: Anthenäum, pp. 25–49.
Moore, C. (ed.). 1967a. The Chinese Mind: Essentials of Chinese Philosophy and Culture. Honolulu, HI: The University Press of Hawaii.
—. 1967b. The Indian Mind: Essentials of Indian Philosophy and Culture. Honolulu, HI: The University Press of Hawaii.
—. 1967c. The Japanese Mind: Essentials of Japanese Philosophy and Culture. Honolulu, HI: The University Press of Hawaii.
Murugan, V. 2000. Tolkappiyam in English-Translation, with the Tamil Text, Transliteration in the Roman Script, Introduction, Glossary, and Illustrations. Chennai; Institute of Asian Studies.
Nakamura, H. 1967. ‘Consciousness of the individual and the universal among the Japanese.’ In Moore (1967c). pp. 179–200.
Oshima, A. and A. Hogue. 2005. Writing Academic English. New York: Addison- Wesley.
Pandharipande, R. V. 1983. ‘Linguistics and written discourse in particular languages: contrastive studies: English and Marathi.’ Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (1982), 3, 118–36.
Parret, H. 1987. Argumentation and narrativity. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds), Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline. Providence, RI: Foris Publications, pp. 165–75.
Ramanthan, V. and D. Atkinson. 1999. ‘Some problematic “channels” in the teaching of critical thinking in current L1 composition textbooks: Implications for L2 student writers.’ Issues in Applied Linguistics 7, 225–49.
Rubin, D. L. (ed.) 1995. Composing Social Identity in Written Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Russell, B. 1926. On Education, Especially in Early Childhood. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Savignon, S. and M. Berns. 1984. Initiatives in Communicative Language Teaching. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Scribner, S. and M. Cole. 1981. The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. 2005. The Argumentative Indian: Writing on Indian History, Culture and Identity. London: Allen Lane.
Silva, T. and P. K. Matsuda (eds) 2001. On Second Language Writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Smith, L. E. (ed.) 1987. Discourse across Cultures: Strategies in World Englishes. London, Prentice-Hall.
Smith, L. E. and M. Forman. (eds) 1997. World Englishes 2000. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
St Amant, K. 1999. ‘When culture and rhetoric contrast: Examining English as an international language of technical communication.’ IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication 42(4), 297–300.
Stapleton, P. 2001. ‘Assessing critical thinking in the writing of Japanese university students: Insights about assumptions and content familiarity.’ Written Communication 18(4), 506–48.
Swales, J. M. 1981. ‘Aspects of article introductions.’ In Aston ESP Research Report No. 1, Language studies Unit. Birmingham, UK: University of Aston in Birmingham.
—. 1985. ‘A genre-based approach to language across the curriculum.’ In Makhan L. Tickoo (ed.) Language across the Curriculum, Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, pp. 10–22.
—. 1990. Genre analysis — English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. and C. B. Feak. 1994. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: A Course for Non-native Speakers of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Teo, A. 1995. ‘Analysis of newspaper editorials: A study of argumentative text structure.’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Tirkkonen-Condit, S. 1985. ‘Argumentative text structure and translation.’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Uljin, J. M. 1996. ‘Translating the culture of technical documents: Some experimental evidence.’ In D. C. Andrews (ed.) International Dimensions of Technical Communication. Arlington: VA: STC, pp. 69–86.
van Dijk, T. 1980. Macrostructure: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates.
Vyas, B. S., B. N. Tiwari and R. N. Srivastava. 1972. hindii vyaakaraN aur racnaa. (Hindi grammar and composition). Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
Werlich, E. 1976. A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg, Germany: Quelle and Meyer.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Yamuna Kachru
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kachru, Y. (2009). Academic Writing in World Englishes: The Asian Context. In: Murata, K., Jenkins, J. (eds) Global Englishes in Asian Contexts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239531_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239531_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-22103-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23953-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)