Skip to main content
  • 127 Accesses

Abstract

Critical studies of leisure face an uncertain future as meaningful, intellectual and professional pursuits. Postmodernism and postmodernity have challenged the taken-for-granted assumptions about Gramscian hegemony underpinning much of the leisure theory that dominated the discipline twenty years ago (Rojek, 1995, 2002). Many theorists and researchers of leisure have given up the attempt to develop a coherent theory of leisure and have retreated to specialisms in sport, tourism or cultural studies (Bramham, 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Karl Spracklen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spracklen, K. (2009). Introduction. In: The Meaning and Purpose of Leisure. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239500_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics