Skip to main content

Continuity and Change in the Italian Model

  • Chapter
European Employment Models in Flux

Abstract

The Italian model does not fit well with the existing classifications of production and welfare regimes. According to the varieties of capitalism approach, Italy is a ‘deviant case, characterized by’ a mix of logics, a high degree of institutional incoherence and an apparent absence of complementarities’ (Molina and Rhodes, 2007, p. 223). A predominance of small, family firms, a large state-enterprise sector and a familistic welfare state place Italy firmly within the southern European model (Karamessini, 2008). However, in the industrial district economy of northern Italy a different dynamic interaction of economic, social, political and cultural factors is found that conforms more to the continental model of coordinated market economies (Becattini, 1987; Brusco, 1989). Two production systems are thus nested within the Italian production model. Over time the economic divide has trickled down to the social sphere so that two varieties of social services have been developed within the national familistic welfare system. This latter divide, evident in education, health and social care, is characterized by a northern model of local services, which for quality and quantity tends towards the continental model, and a southern model which is struggling with economic, structural and political difficulties. The North-South dualism of the production and social models is the most distinctive trait of the Italian model. These models, at the national and local level, are confronted by various challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (1998), ‘Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4): 1055–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AGCM (Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato) (2005), Relazione annuale sull’attività svolta, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, P. and Scherer, F. (2005), ‘Le conseguenze sociali della flessibilizzazione del mercato del lavoro in Italia’, Stato e Mercato 74 (8): 291–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barca, F. (2005), Italia frenata, Rome: Donzelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G. (ed.) (1987), Mercato e forze locali: il distretto industriale, Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berloffa, G. and Villa, P. (2007), ‘Inequality Across Cohorts of Households: Evidence from Italy’, Dipartimento di Economia, Università degli Studi di Trento, Discussion Paper, 11/2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, F. and Plantenga, J. (2004), ‘Comparing Care Regimes in Europe’, Feminist Economics 10 (1): 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, F. and Villa, P. (1999), ‘To What Extent Does it Pay to be Better Educated? Education and Market Work for Women in Italy’, South European Society and Politics 4 (2): 150–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, F., Simonazzi, A. and Villa P. (2006), ‘Change in Care Regimes and Female Migration: The “care drain” in the Mediterranean’, Journal of European Social Policy 16 (3): 271–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandolini, A., Casadio, P., Cipollone, P., Magnani, M., Rosolia, A. and Torrini, R. (2007), ‘Employment Growth in Italy in the 1990s: Institutional Arrangements and Market Forces’, pp. 31–68 in N. Acocella and R. Leoni (eds), Social Pacts, Employment and Growth, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S. (1989), Piccole imprese e distretti industriali, Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugamelli, M. (2001), ‘Il modello di specializzazione internazionale dell area dell euro e dei principali paesi europei: omogeneità e convergenza’, Bank of Italy, Temi di Discussione 402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarlone, S. (2001), ‘Evidence of Product Differentiation and Relative Quality’ in Italian Trade, Rivista italiana degli economisti 6 (2): 147–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C. M. (1995), Storia facile dell’economia italiana dal medioevo ad oggi, Milano: Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costi, R. and Messori, M. (eds) (2005), Per lo sviluppo. Un capitalismo senza rendite e senza capitale, Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabiani, S., Schivardi, F. and Trento, S. (2003), ‘Quale impresa italiana investe in tecnologie digitali?’, pp. 125–50 in S. Rossi (ed.), La nuova economia. Ifatti dietro il mito, The New Economy, Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facchini, C. and Villa, P. (2005), ‘La lenta transizione alla vita adulta in Italia’, pp. 61–104 in C. Facchini (ed.), Diventare adulti. Vincoli economici e strategie familiari, Milano: Guerini Scientifica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faini, R. and Sapir, A. (2005), ‘Un modello obsoleto? Crescita e specializzazione dell economia italiana’, pp. 19–77 in T. Boeri, R. Faini, A. Ichino, G. Pisauro and C. Scarpa (eds), Oltre il declino, Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The “Southern Model” of Welfare in Social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 6 (1): 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacomelli, S. and Trento, S. (2005), ‘Proprietà, controllo e trasferimenti nelle imprese italiane. Cosa è cambiato nel decennio 1993–2003?’, Bank of Italy, Temi di Discussione 550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, A. (2005), ‘Le porte del cambiamento. A proposito di alcune recenti interpretazioni del ristagno dell economia italiana’, Economia & Lavoro 39 (2): 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, A. and Simonazzi, A. (2005), ‘Patterns of Industrialisation and the Flyinggeese Model: The Case of Electronics in East Asia’, Journal of Asian Economics 15 (6): 1051–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichino, A., Mealli, F. and Nannicini, T. (2005), ‘Temporary Work Agencies in Italy: A Springboard Toward Permanent Employment?’, Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 64 (1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istat (2005), Rapporto annuale. La situazione del Paese nel 2004, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istat (2006), ‘L innovazione nelle imprese italiane. Anni 2002–2004’, Statistiche in breve, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istat (2007), Rapporto annuale. La situazione del Paese nel 2006, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamessini, M. (2008), ‘Continuity and Change in the Southern European Social Model’, International Labour Review 147 (1): 43–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mediobanca (2000), Le privatizzazioni in Italia dal 1992, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M. and Ottaviano, G. (2005), ‘Market Size, Trade, and Productivity’, NBER Working Paper Series 11393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, O. and Rhodes, M. (2007), ‘The Political Economy of Adjustment in Mixed Market Economies: A Study of Spain and Italy’, pp. 223–52 in B. Hancké, M. Rhodes and M. Thatcher (eds), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: OUP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morlicchio, E. and Pugliese, E. (2004), ‘Il modello italiano di povertà’, Economia & Lavoro 38 (2-3): 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naticchioni, P. and Lucidi, F. (2006), ‘What’s Behind the Italian Structural Economic Crisis? Specialisation vs. Liberalization Issues’, FGB and Dynamo WP. http://www.dynamoproject.eu

  • Naticchioni, P., Ricci, A. and Rustichelli, E. (2007), ‘Far Away from a Skill-Biased Change: Falling Educational Wage Premia in Italy’, CEIS — University of Rome Tor Vergata Discussion Paper 260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onida, F. (2003), ‘Growth, Competitiveness and Firm Size: Factors Shaping the Role of Italy’s Productive System in the World Arena’, CESPRI Working Papers 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picchio, M. (2006), ‘Wage Differentials and Temporary Jobs in Italy’, Université Catholique de Louvain, Discussion Paper 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J. and Sabel, C. F. (1984), The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosolia, A. and Torrini, R. (2007), ‘The Generation Gap: Relative Earnings of Young and Old Workers in Italy’, Bank of Italy, Temi di discussione, n. 639, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. and Enste, D. (2002), The Shadow Economy: An International Survey, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonazzi, A. (ed.) (2006), Questioni di genere, questioni di politica. Trasformazioni economiche e sociali in una prospettiva di genere, Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonazzi, A. (2009), ‘Care Regimes and National Employment Models’, Cambridge Journal of Economics (in press, 10.1093/cje/ben043).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonazzi, A. and Villa, P. (2009), ‘“La grande illusion”. ‘How Italy’s “American Dream” Turned Sour’, in D. Anxo, G. Bosch and J. Rubery (eds), Welfare States and Life Transitions, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (1997), ‘Beneficial Constraints: On the Economic Limits of Rational Voluntarism’, pp. 197–219 in J. R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (eds), Contemporary Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vianello, F. (2008), ‘Sistemi di imprese. A proposito della nuova raccolta di saggi di Sebastiano Brusco (e della precedente)’, Economia & Lavoro 42 (1): 109–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Annamaria Simonazzi, Paola Villa, Federico Lucidi and Paolo Naticchioni

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simonazzi, A., Villa, P., Lucidi, F., Naticchioni, P. (2009). Continuity and Change in the Italian Model. In: Bosch, G., Lehndorff, S., Rubery, J. (eds) European Employment Models in Flux. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230237001_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics