Skip to main content

Abstract

In this era dominated by the War on Terror, the concept of commitment and its corollary appeal to ‘speak up’ against threats of global violence have reemerged in various public settings. On the August 3, 2006, for instance, a letter was published in The Guardian, entitled ‘War Crimes and Lebanon’ which was signed by a number of distinguished intellectuals.1 While the ‘international community stood and watched’, as the petition read, the ‘state terror inflicted on Lebanon is being repeated in the Gaza ghetto’. The public intellectuals accused the governments of Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom of committing war crimes in Lebanon and Palestine, and offered their solidarity to those who mounted a resistance against it and support to the victims. They declared: ‘For our part, we will use all the means at our disposal to expose the complicity of our governments in these crimes.’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (2002) ‘Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others’, The American Anthropologist, 104(3): pp. 783–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, I. (1995) ‘I’m a Feminist but … “Other” Women and Postnational Feminisms’, in B. Caine and R. Pringle (eds.) Transitions: New Australian Feminism, St. Leonard’s, Australia: Allen & Unwin, pp. 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. (2001) ‘Cosmo-Theory’, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 100(3): pp. 659–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991) ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color’, Stanford Law Review, 43(6): pp. 1241–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, D. (2001) Intellectuals and Politics in Post-War France, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977) ‘Intellectuals & Power: A Conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze’, in D. F. Bouchard (ed.) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 205–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980) ‘Truth and Power’, in C. Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, C. Gordon (trans.), Brighton: The Harvester Press, pp. 109–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golsan, R.J. (2006) French Writers and the Politics of Complicity: Crises of Democracy in the 1940s and 1990s, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1981) Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism, Boston, MA: Southend Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. and Kemp-Welch, A. (1997) ‘The Century of the Intellectual: From the Dreyfus Affair to Salman Rushdie’, in J. Jennings and A. Kemp-Welch (eds.) Intellectuals in Politics: From the Dreyfus Affair to the Rushdie Affair, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, T. (2002) ‘The Push and Pull of Rights and Responsibilities’, Interventions: The International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 4(2): pp. 191–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J-F. (1993) ‘The Tomb of the Intellectual’, Political Writings, B. Readings and K.P. Geiman (trans.), London: U.C.L. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C.T. (1988) ‘Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses’, Feminist Review, 30. pp. 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1994) Representations of the Intellectual, London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. (2002) Complicities: The Intellectual and Apartheid, New York and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J-P. (1974) ‘A Plea for Intellectuals’, between Existentialism and Marxism, J. Matthews (trans.), London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, D.L. (1997) ‘Are Intellectuals a Dying Species? War and the Ivory Tower in the Post-Modern Age’, in J. Jennings and A. Kemp-Welch (eds.) Intellectuals in Politics: From the Dreyfus Affair to Salman Rushdie, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 271–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, D.L. (2005) War and the Ivory Tower: Algeria and Vietnam, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G.C. (1994) ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, in P. Williams and L. Chrisman (eds.) Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory a Reader, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 66–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G.C. (1999) A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zola, E. (1898) ‘J’Accuse’, L’Aurore, January 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Begüm Özden Fırat, Sarah De Mul, and Sonja van Wichelen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fırat, B.Ö., De Mul, S., van Wichelen, S. (2009). Introduction: Commitment and Complicity. In: Fırat, B.Ö., De Mul, S., van Wichelen, S. (eds) Commitment and Complicity in Cultural Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236967_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics