Skip to main content

Possibility Theorems for Equitably Aggregating Infinite Utility Streams

  • Chapter
Book cover Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

The need to aggregate and evaluate infinite streams of returns or utility arises in several areas of economics, ranging from intergenerational welfare theory to environmental economics. The subject of intergenerational equity in the context of aggregating infinite utility streams has been of enduring interest to economists, starting with the work of Ramsey (1928), who had maintained that discounting one generation’s utility or income vis-à-vis another’s to be ‘ethically indefensible’, and something that ‘arises merely from the weakness of the imagination.’ His conjecture about the difficulty of aggregating infinite streams, while respecting intergenerational equity, turned out to be compelling, as a large number of impossibility theorems were proved subsequently by a number of authors, starting with the seminal works of Koopmans (1960) and Diamond (1965).

This paper benefited greatly from a presentation and discussion at the IEA Roundtable Meeting in Hakone, Japan, 10–12 March 2005, and from a detailed comment by Yongsheng Xu. This is an area where, over the years, we have had conversations with and comments from a large number of economists and would like to thank, in particular, Geir Asheim, Claude d’Aspremont, Kuntal Banerjee, Marc Fleurbaey, Nick Kiefer, Wlodek Rabinowicz, Tomoichi Shinotsuka, Kotaro Suzumura and Jorgen Weibull.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, W.E. (1939) ‘The Determinateness of the Utility Function’, Economic Journal, vol. 49, pp. 453–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1963) Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn ( New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. (1994) ‘Group Rationality, Utilitarianism and Escher’s “Waterfall”’, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 7, pp. 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and T. Mitra (2003) ‘Aggregating Infinite Utility Streams with Intergenerational Equity: The Impossibility of Being Paretian’, Econometrica, vol. 79, pp. 1557–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., Y. Sprumont and K. Suzumura (2004) ‘The Possibility of Ordering Infinite Utility Streams’, mimeo: Université de Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T. and D. Parfit (1992) ‘Against the Social Discount Rate’, in P. Laslett and J.S. Fishkin (eds), Justice between Age-Groups and Generations ( New Haven: Yale University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. (1965) ‘The Evaluation of Infinite Utility Streams’, Econometrica, vol. 33, pp. 170–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M. and P. Michel (2003) ‘Intertemporal Equity and the Extension of the Ramsey Principle’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 39, pp. 777–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C. (1960) ‘Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience’, Econometrica,vol. 28, pp. 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, T. (1962) The Measurement of Utility, 2nd edn ( London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • May, K.O. (1952) ‘A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision’, Econometrica, vol. 20, pp. 680–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munkres, J. (1975) Topology ( London: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. (1928) ‘A Mathematical Theory of Savings’, Economic Journal, vol. 38, pp. 543–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segerberg, K. (1976) ‘A Neglected Family of Aggregation Problems in Ethics’, Nous, vol. 10, pp. 221–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare ( San Francisco: Holden-Day).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1977) ‘On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis’, Econometrica, vol. 45, pp. 1539–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K. (1983) Rational Choice, Collective Decisions and Social Welfare ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K. and T. Shinotsuka (2003) ‘On the Possibility of Continuous, Paretian and Egalitarian Evaluation of Infinite Utility Streams’, mimeo: Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.-G. (1980) ‘Equity among Generations’, Econometrica, vol. 48, pp. 1251–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y. (2007) ‘Pareto Principle and Intergenerational Equity: Immediate Impatience, Universal Indifference and Impossibility’, Ch. 7 of this volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Basu, K., Mitra, T. (2007). Possibility Theorems for Equitably Aggregating Infinite Utility Streams. In: Roemer, J., Suzumura, K. (eds) Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236769_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics